Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-dns/pdnsd

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:46:40 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: >On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:34:46 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote: >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:35:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> >> >On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:33:34 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote: >> >> Fails to b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-dns/pdnsd

On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:35:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: >On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:33:34 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote: >> Fails to build with recent kernel headers (bug #801688). >> Upstream is gone for a long time. Masked for removal in 30 days. >> Users should switch over to

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-dns/pdnsd

Fails to build with recent kernel headers (bug #801688). Upstream is gone for a long time. Masked for removal in 30 days. Users should switch over to net-dns/dnsmasq which provides similar features. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/clementine

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 23:56:10 + Alexey Sokolov wrote: >24.11.2021 11:33, Lars Wendler пишет: >> No real development since Q1 2020. Last release from 2016. >> Users should switch over to media-sound/strawberry which is an >> actively developed fork. >> Ma

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/clementine

No real development since Q1 2020. Last release from 2016. Users should switch over to media-sound/strawberry which is an actively developed fork. Masked for removal in 30 days. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpRURZrDQaTs.pgp

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, the following packages are up for grabs: app-emulation/sen (3 open bugs) dev-python/flexmock sys-process/nmon (2 open bugs) x11-wm/i3 Cheers -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpWcw9hwsTLL.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: breaking change to app-misc/mc user-configuration handling

>> /etc/portage/package.use I suppose that should be: echo 'app-misc/mc xdg' >> /etc/portage/package.use > emerge --oneshot >and have every user on your system with ~/.mc present run mc at least run mc _and_ mcedit once >once prior to the version upgrade. > >No actio

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Decoupling stabilization from security bugs

't think it's such a herculean effort to outweigh >the problems solved. Indeed, filing stablereq bugs is not really that big of a deal. >In the end, consistency is a good thing and we've introduced a >dedicated stabilization category to reduce the spread of stabilization >bugs all ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: sys-libs/db old SLOT removal

paragraph doesn't belong into a news item. I think this should belong into the news item in order to explain our rationale behind this decision. Kind regards -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgp335SIFC_4x.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] (resent) [PATCH] eclass: Support dev-util/samurai

From: orbea Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- eclass/cmake.eclass | 22 -- eclass/meson.eclass | 4 ++-- eclass/ninja-utils.eclass | 37 +++-- 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eclass: Support dev-util/samurai

From: orbea Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- eclass/cmake.eclass | 10 +- eclass/meson.eclass | 4 ++-- eclass/ninja-utils.eclass | 35 +-- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b/eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Two package up for grabs

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:31:22 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote: >Hi community, > >already quite a while ago, base-system team had decided to no longer >maintain the following packages: > > sys-fs/reiser4progs (up to date, 3 open bug reports) > sys-libs/libaal (required by reis

[gentoo-dev] Two package up for grabs

packages to maintainer-needed. Thanks and kind regards -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgph4FbK38d2s.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ?

ink. > >Keeping it as a file would mean convincing upstream(s) that the >symlink is a systemd-ism, not a standard. > >Regards With enough motivation we can carry that revert for a very long time. I know that because I still carry reverts in my udev packages from when it was devoured by sy

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: binhost

o systems and even though these systems don't have to compile anything themselves, installing ~100 to ~200 binpkgs takes way more than an hour of installation time. Arch Linux' pacman only takes a fraction of this time for the very same task. I know that I compare apples with pears here but even r

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dealing with global /usr/bin/libtool use vs CC/CXX etc.

s-devel/slibtool slibtool is aimed to be a drop-in replacement although at the current state it still has a couple of hiccups. I've created a tracker bug at [1] to track all issues arising from using slibtool instead of GNU libtool. Cheers Lars [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/765709 -- L

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages & projects up for grabs due to jer's retirement

dmin/whowatch >net-ftp/lftp >net-misc/putty And I am interested in these as well in case nobody else takes them: >net-dns/libidn >net-dns/libidn2 >net-misc/youtube-dl >x11-libs/libvdpau >x11-misc/vdpauinfo Cheers Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 2 cleanup update

the impeding doom long. > >I will probably prepare an updated news item for Python 2.7 removal, >to replace the one from February with the updated plan, current >information and helpful tips. > > >Finally, I would like to thank all the helpful package maintainers, >arch teams and other developers who have made this possible. > Cheers -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpmIfQK493qK.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] IPython 7.17 drops Python 3.6 support AKA upgrade reminder

Honestly... seeing such replies from you or knowing that you do not hesitate to hit other devs with your full QA deputy power once they dare to touch python packages is not motivating in any way to even consider helping you. Have a nice day... -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpp3XGWb__M7.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

libraries >maintainer-needed (libpng, jpeg, tiff, ...) which would really merit a >team... > > Just for the record, media-libs/libpng belongs to base-system team for years. I do not even remember it ever belonged to graphics team. So it's obviously not up for grabs :) Cheers Lars

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

On Wed, 20 May 2020 00:21:37 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: >On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 1:23 AM Lars Wendler >wrote: > >> Hi Alec, >> >> On Mon, 18 May 2020 18:42:24 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: >> >> >TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org, an identity provider t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

developers" or "any >community member." The former have LDAP accounts and @gentoo.org email >addresses and so we can manage them easily; managing 1000s of other >accounts in the IDP remains to be seem. In case 2FA won't be mandatory I find this a good idea. K

[gentoo-dev] forthcoming app-admin/sudo-1.9.0 - time to place your feature requests now!

the perfect time for users to request possibly missing features for our sudo ebuild. So if you think the new version could also benefit from some feature our current sudo ebuilds don't have, feel free to speak up now. Thanks Lars (Gentoo base-system team lead) -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: sci-astronomy/celestia

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 22:48:22 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: >El mié, 22-01-2020 a las 10:18 +0100, Lars Wendler escribió: >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:56:48 +0100 David Seifert wrote: >> >> > # David Seifert (2020-01-21) >> > # All released versions depend on EOL gtkglex

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: sci-astronomy/celestia

ill actively maintaining it and the live ebuild already dropped gtkglext dependency. Once a new release was rolled I will add that to Gentoo. The old releases can go. They're way too old and even don't run anymore with recent nvidia display drivers. Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21

Re: [gentoo-dev] crypto@ packages up for grabs

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:50:29 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >On 09.01.2020 09:09, Lars Wendler wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 00:16:13 +0300 Mikle Kolyada wrote: >> >>> These are up for grabs due to the crypto@ project being disbanded. >>> >... > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] crypto@ packages up for grabs

n these… but I'd appreciate it if someone wants to co-maintain them with me. Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpONVC2RGjOD.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] crypto@ packages up for grabs

se gnutls (R)DEPENDs on both. Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgp6KHFvX489y.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

maintenance, just replace my email address and name with yours in the metadata file. Otherwise I will drop the packages to maintainer-needed in about a week after I've sent this mail. Cheers Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for cron (16)

://github.com/Polynomial-C/gentoo/commits/accts-cronie -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpm9Iwg6tq7o.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] RFC: GID assignment for crontab (44)

/Polynomial-C/gentoo/commits/accts-cronie -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpiyaoJqZxnF.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for apache (81)

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:43:11 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: >On 8/13/19 2:30 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> >> If we leave ACCT_USER_HOME empty HOME will be set to >> /dev/null for apache user. I don't know if this is what we want. >I'm not 100% sure either

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for apache (81)

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:21:29 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: >On 8/13/19 1:53 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> >> thanks for the review. I've force-pushed the acct-user/apache commit >> with ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER being set to root:root. >> > >Is there any benefi

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for apache (81)

Hi Michael, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 13:39:34 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: >On 8/13/19 1:14 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> I would like to reserve UID/GID 81 for apache (www-servers/apache). >> >> This is the historical UID/GID for apache user in Gentoo. >> Fedora and RedHat

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for apache (81)

Here are the commits for possible review: https://github.com/Polynomial-C/gentoo/commits/accts-apache -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpwEDbny_POL.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for pdnsd (184)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 184 for pdnsd (net-dns/pdnsd). This is the same ID used by Arch Linux. Here are the commits for possible review: https://github.com/Polynomial-C/gentoo/commits/accts-pdnsd -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for nsd (223)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 223 for nsd (net-dns/nsd). Neither Arch Linux nor Fedora nor RedHat claim that UID/GID. Here are the commits for possible review: https://github.com/Polynomial-C/gentoo/commits/accts-nsd -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for murmurd (122)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 122 for murmurd (media-sound/murmur). This is the same ID used by Arch Linux. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpEco463JumM.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for msmtpd (222)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 222 for msmtpd (mail-mta/msmtp). Neither Arch Linux nor Fedora nor RedHat claim that UID/GID. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgp21YdmDozUH.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for gkrellmd (221)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 221 for gkrellmd (app-admin/gkrellm). Neither Arch Linux nor Fedora nor RedHat claim that UID/GID. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpTMOp86BRjk.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for uptimed (220)

I would like to reserve UID/GID 220 for uptimed (app-misc/uptimed). Neither Arch Linux nor Fedora nor RedHat claim that UID/GID. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpj_flJvoCv0.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-group/uptimed: Synced GID with uptimed user's UID

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 19:01:42 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Lars Wendler wrote: > >> -ACCT_GROUP_ID=210 >> +ACCT_GROUP_ID=103 > >Note that 103 will collide with Arch's "minio" user and group. We have >that packa

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] acct-group/gkrellmd: Initial commit

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 19:04:14 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Lars Wendler wrote: > >> +ACCT_GROUP_ID=104 > >Collides with Arch's nm-openconnect (which we have as >net-vpn/networkmanager-openconnect). Alright... screw these pa

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] app-admin/gkrellm: Synced live ebuild

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- app-admin/gkrellm/gkrellm-.ebuild | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/app-admin/gkrellm/gkrellm-.ebuild b/app-admin/gkrellm/gkrellm-.ebuild index d205ffcda8a

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] app-admin/gkrellm: Revbump replacing user eclass

with gkrellmd group/user packages. Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- app-admin/gkrellm/gkrellm-2.3.11-r1.ebuild | 147 + 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+) create mode 100644 app-admin/gkrellm/gkrellm-2.3.11-r1.ebuild diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] acct-user/gkrellmd: Initial commit

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- acct-user/gkrellmd/gkrellmd-0.ebuild | 12 acct-user/gkrellmd/metadata.xml | 8 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/gkrellmd/gkrellmd-0.ebuild create mode

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] acct-group/gkrellmd: Initial commit

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- acct-group/gkrellmd/gkrellmd-0.ebuild | 8 acct-group/gkrellmd/metadata.xml | 8 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/gkrellmd/gkrellmd-0.ebuild create mode 100644

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-group/uptimed: Synced GID with uptimed user's UID

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- acct-group/uptimed/uptimed-0.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/acct-group/uptimed/uptimed-0.ebuild b/acct-group/uptimed/uptimed-0.ebuild index eb3672ba65e..952c350399c 100644

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] acct-user/uptimed: Initial commit

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:22:18 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: >On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:19 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: >> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 >> Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler >> --- >> acct-user/uptimed/metadata.xml | 8 >> acct-u

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] acct-user/uptimed: Initial commit

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:22:18 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: >On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:19 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: >> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 >> Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler >> --- >> acct-user/uptimed/metadata.xml | 8 >> acct-u

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-misc/uptimed: Revbump replacing user eclass

with uptimed group/user packages. Also bump to EAPI-7 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- app-misc/uptimed/uptimed-0.4.1-r2.ebuild | 60 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) create mode 100644 app-misc/uptimed/uptimed-0.4.1-r2

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] acct-user/uptimed: Initial commit

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- acct-user/uptimed/metadata.xml | 8 acct-user/uptimed/uptimed-0.ebuild | 12 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/uptimed/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] acct-group/uptimed: Inital commit

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.71, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler --- acct-group/uptimed/metadata.xml | 8 acct-group/uptimed/uptimed-0.ebuild | 8 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/uptimed/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct-group

[gentoo-dev] Current status with openssl-1.1

st concern right now is that openssh might still block openssl-1.1.1 once that got released. openssl-1.1.1 provides TLSv1.3 which is something we should provide to our users as soon as possible and is also targeted as next LTS release. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/592438 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/5925

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

but rather prefer a useless additional layer for that (libsystemd). If nobody picks it up I either gonna put it on maintainer-needed in about 30 days or (if QA prefers that) lastrite it entirely. Kind regards Lars [1] https://github.com/libratbag/libratbag/issues/239 -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package

Re: [gentoo-dev] berkdb and gdbm in global USE defaults

ds globally. > >Thoughts? > >William > Considering the questionable license situation with latest sys-libs/db releases (AGPL), I'd say we should prefer gdbm over berkdb in case we want to keep one db backend default enabled. IIRC Fedora is even trying to entirely getting rid of berkd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailing list moderation and community openness

explain how this doesn't directly contradict the >core tenets of an open and inclusive community? > >1: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964 > +1 This is ridiculous and council should be ashamed of this decision. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 458

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:58:10 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: >net-wireless/hostapd In case nobody else wants to take it I can do. But I'm a mere user of the package and don't know anything about its internals. So it would be very basic/low maintenance from me. Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo pack

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing updates on many identical Gentoo systems

same, as long as you provide a sane set of binpkgs, dependency calculation should not matter anyway. The only issue I can think of is that a system might become broken if the update gets interrupted before all packages have been updated. Kind regards -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:03:54 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote: >On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:55:11AM +0100, Lars Wendler wrote: >> Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something... > >Elitist seems too kind a word. Knee-jerk reaction, petty vendetta, >impulsive emotional reac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

vant problem-mail that came from >@gentoo.org, maybe the glass house dwellers should be careful where >they aim their stones. I considered taking the dev quiz and everything >instead of just posting a few ebuilds on bugzilla years ago, but the >elitist, as Alex labelled it, voices from @gentoo.org are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

s it stands now is just not >working. > Wow. I couldn't have said it better. Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something... I wonder how many users we're going to loose on this one. Well done council :-( -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects up for grabs: cron, m68k

Am Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:02:22 +0100 schrieb Michał Górny : > Hello, everyone. > > Due to prolonged inactivity of Mike Frysinger (vapier), the following > projects have had effectively no members for 6 months already: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Cron > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

Am Sun, 17 Dec 2017 13:40:35 -0500 schrieb Mike Gilbert : > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Gilbert > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny > > wrote: > >> Hello, everyone. > >> > >> It's my pleasure to

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-boot/plymouth needs major fixes/maintainer

nvolved in that OpenRC support too >still, right? > >I'm not sure about >kde-plasma/breeze-plymouth >kde-plasma/plymouth-kcm >do you use KDE/Plasma to care for those too? > > Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

frustration level has sufficiently decreased. Kind regards Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 pgpatNBwwwG4t.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla package list editing

yntax). Bug 616260 is one such example. I must admit that I did the same (changing full package names to full package atoms). IIRC when these package lists were introduced this was the only valid syntax and stable bot complained if it was not a package atom. >Best regards, >Chí-Thanh Christo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Enable verbose build logs.

elective_werror} >+ ${no_silent} > ${FONT_OPTIONS} > "${xorgconfadd[@]}" > ) very unlikely scenario but what happens if configure does not provide "disable-silent-rules" but "${no_silent} was defined somewhere in the environ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:30:25 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: >W dniu 26.02.2017, nie o godzinie 21∶16 +0100, użytkownik Lars Wendler >napisał: >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:59:19 + Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:42:59 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: >On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Lars Wendler ><polynomia...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:07:48 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnso

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

it clone of the tree. Ever since portage was migrated to git I had this line in my .git/info/attributes file on my dev box: *.ebuild ident This is a very useful feature and should not be removed only because council was told that it's a mere CVS migration cruft. It is not! -- Lars Wendler Gentoo pac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:32:56 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: >On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler ><polynomia...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> >>>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler: >> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do >> any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so >> b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

from infra regarding $Id$ gives enough good examples why this header line should be kept. This $Id$ header line is the only way how I can safely keep official ebuilds and ebuilds from my overlay in sync. I don't like getting my workflows sabotaged and I consider this a pure act of sabotage... Ho

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build

ll undermine the >> portability of OpenRC sooner or later. >> >> After all OpenRC is a small program easy to build with a hand-written >> Makefile. >> >> Parallel make issues? No problem let's just solve it. >> >> >> Please, keep it simple. >

[gentoo-dev] virtualbox packages will get its hardened support removed within one week.

when they in fact more often do not. I know this might upset a couple of devs and users but I have to draw a line somewhere and I decided I draw it here. Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See https

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

not very active anymore. >I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of view) >the most convenient tool to control ethernet and wifi connections on a >notebook. Why lastrite it when it works? > >Andrey > Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

all the best and if you ever feel the urge, please come back :) Kind regards Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html pgpYM

[gentoo-dev] bash-4.4 - call for testers

help me determining when this bash version can be removed from package.mask. Perhaps we even consider stabilizing bash-4.4 a bit sooner now that there's a security bug [2] that requires bash-4.4 for the fix. Thanks in advance. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/594496 -- Lars

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-block/eject

Dead upstream since 2013. Superseded by eject from sys-apps/util-linux. Slated for removal in 30 days. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg

Re: [gentoo-dev] base-system needs developers who care

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:08:30 -0400 Anthony G. Basile wrote: >On 8/23/16 8:03 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> I have some kind of interest for these packages: > >Lars, maybe once we get some names we should get a meeting of >base-system together and coordinate our efforts. In par

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

This package is now up for grabs: net-irc/rbot -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html pgpfOxyZA4prL.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur

Re: [gentoo-dev] base-system needs developers who care

et-firewall/iptables net-misc/dhcpcd net-misc/dhcp net-misc/ntp net-misc/openssh sys-apps/coreutils sys-apps/kbd But I think I cannot maintain all of them alone. So yeah, fresh (active!) blood in base-system would be nice. Kind regards Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21

Re: [gentoo-dev] Developers, please work on underlinking issues!

ch statements I won't use ld.gold anywhere on my (dev-)systems. A linker IMHO is a far too crucial toolchain component to blindly play around with. >Best regards, >Andrew Savchenko Cheers Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39

Re: [gentoo-dev] Electron external dependencies

gards, >Alex Hi Alex, I suggest you open a bug about this in our bugzilla [1]. Use something like "dev-util/electron uses bundled libs" as subject and describe the issue briefly. Thanks. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:36:54 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: >This packages are now up for grabs: >app-admin/keepassx >media-sound/mumble >media-sound/murmur > > I gonna take all three packages. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

lient as I need it for work. Cheers Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html pgpL340DbFp9e.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CVS headers in ebuilds

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:12:44 +0200 Ole Reifschneider wrote: >On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:30:15AM -0400, Jonathan Callen wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 04/04/2016 02:58 AM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> > On Sun, 3 Apr 2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS headers in ebuilds

y. So please keep this line. Thanks. Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now) http://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html pgpclkVFNS3fO.pg

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab

plans to drop myself as maintainer :) >These are of interest. I'll take them. > >Regards, >Tony V. > > > -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now) http://www.ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

nother rant ;) > >Just that the current initscript does a lot more, and ... uhm ... why >is the systemd unit sourcing /etc/conf.d/apache2 ? Becasue I don't give a damn about systemd and nobody cared to send patches yet. >(Oh, and dependencies, but those just slow down startup ) >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

>> I have no idea which is the case here. If the base-system >> maintainers want to maintain these two packages, have at it! If >> not, leave it as maintainer-needed. > >if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd >-mike well, I already added m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd up for grabs: net-dialup

Hi Mike, On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:32:02 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: >On 17 Jan 2016 21:57, Lars Wendler wrote: >> I am going to take the following packages: >> >> net-dialup/mingetty >> net-dialup/ppp >> net-dialup/rp-pppoe >> >> I thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4

this be in an elog message, or part of the news item? > >Cheers, > >Dirkjan > -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now) http://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-im

efs : >x11-plugins/pidgin-hotkeys : >x11-plugins/pidgin-latex : >x11-plugins/pidgin-libnotify : >x11-plugins/pidgin-mpris : chainsaw@ >x11-plugins/pidgin-musictracker : >x11-plugins/pidgin-opensteamworks : hasufell@, mrueg@ >x11-plugins/pidgin-otr : >x11-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd up for grabs: net-dialup

-dns/pdnsd: polynomial-c@ >net-libs/libcapi : >net-libs/wvstreams : >net-misc/capiisdnmon : >net-misc/hylafaxplus : mattm@ >net-misc/iaxmodem: >net-misc/termpkg : >www-apps/freeradius-dialupadmin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

>sys-fs/lufis : >sys-fs/siefs : >sys-fs/sshfs-fuse: radhermit@ >sys-kernel/linux-docs: mpagano@ >sys-power/cpupower : ssuominen@, floppym@ >sys-process/schedtool: > > -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2_OPTS, websites could end up serving >PHP code (include configuration files with passwords) >unprocessed to website visitors! > > >The origin of this news item is: >https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569042 >=== > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] samba (and related) packages are in desperate need of help

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:23:24 +0200 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: >On 9/1/15 3:24 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> * samba upstream is extremely uncooperative. Best example is that we >> still have some automagic dependencies [5] in samba's build system >> and upstream is no

Re: [gentoo-dev] samba (and related) packages are in desperate need of help

Hey all, seems like I need to correct one of my previous said statements. Please see below: On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:24:05 +0200 Lars Wendler wrote: >Hey community, > >for a way too long time Gentoo's samba packages lack the attention they >would require to keep them top notch a

  1   2   >