On 28 November 2012 13:54, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
We could slightly simplify the handbook installation procedure if we
told people to use emerge-webrsync to fetch the initial snapshot. What
do people think?
Seems a good improvement to me.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo
a maintainer who will fix the pending bugs
and bump it to the latest release. In the meantime, I will re-assign
it to maintainer-needed@ so proxy-maintainers
can step-up and help if someone from the user community is willing to
maintain it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID
On Dec 2, 2012 6:09 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Only question is now what is a sane soft limit, before you go on and fix
stuff.
From a discussion in #gentoo-dev we thought 2-4 weeks depending on the
On 4 December 2012 01:18, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 3 December 2012 03:30, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012 6:09 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Only question is now
touch them himself. Let the retirement team
kick him out.
There is always the description tag on metadata.xml you can use eg
maintainer
emailf...@gentoo.org/email
nameMe/name
descriptionPrimary maintainer but feel free to fix the bugsdescription
/maintainer
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo
, the default action is to assume
his is
the real maintainer and the bugs should be assigned to him. Such
guidance should be documented in the bug-wranglers project page and
not on the
proxy-maintainers one.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 4 December 2012 15:42, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 01:18, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 3 December 2012 03:30, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012 6:09
On 6 December 2012 11:02, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 5 December 2012 02:51, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 17:28, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 12/04/2012 12:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Or maybe we can just agree
On 6 December 2012 15:27, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
This policy is for the bug-wranglers project, which someone must
read before he attempts to do any bug-wrangling.
I see no reason to move this to devmanual.
The reason is that I as a developer (whenever I
.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
some
packages are forgotten :S
We also have 720 packages listed as maintainer-needed[1] meaning
nobody is actually taking care of them.
And this number is pretty scary.
[1]http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer
or useless.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
They may not be broken or useless but if they are not neglected,
please add yourself to metadata.xml. What's the point of having them
marked as unmaintained if there is a maintainer behind them?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux
-misc/identicurse (no bugs, no stable)
I'll drop myself in a week and assign to m-n@g.o or leave just the herd.
Of course unless you grab them first ;-)
Thanks!
Kacper
If the herd is not active, please drop it from metadata otherwise bugs
will remain unattended.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 14 December 2012 07:56, George Shapovalov geo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday 13 December 2012 21:25:59 Markos Chandras wrote:
We also have 720 packages listed as maintainer-needed[1] meaning
nobody is actually taking care of them.
And this number is pretty scary.
Scary how?
With over
that the stable
*use.stable.mask will also end up
unmaintained in the near future.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 14 December 2012 14:29, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:38:24 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13 December 2012 21:46, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/13/2012 12:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:33:50 +0100
will be able to keep the 'diff' between them as minimum as
possible, then I have no objections.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 16 December 2012 14:22, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
sys-power/hibernate-script
I can take that, but if anyone else wants to help, feel free to do so
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
bounties.
I don't like the attitude pay in order to happen. This is a foss
project, so people are supposed to
see this as a hobby or a learning experience. It is not a job ;)
Things are supposed to happen because they are fun
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 17 December 2012 00:10, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 12/16/12 14:04, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use
some of that bug bounty money to fix up
.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
ways to reach a point where a recruiter picks
you for interview makes it hard to document it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
flags go to metadata.xml and not local.use.desc anymore etc
and that's because their mentors did a very very bad job in preparing
them. Be a responsible mentor, train them well, and the recruitment
will be much faster than you might expect.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer
most people will have
their own cflags in make.conf.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
regards,
Michał Górny
+1 sounds good to me.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 17 December 2012 12:31, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing
this. The foundation has the funds to support it, and none of us
actually have
On 17 December 2012 14:08, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing
this. The foundation has the funds to support it, and none of us
actually have
( and I am also open to g+ and skype
interviews as well ). So IRC is not an absolute requirement.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 19 December 2012 09:03, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Of course, it all would be
easier if we used git.
Please lets not hijack yet another thread with the git migration.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
.
Let's put the tree in /var/cache/portage please, and distfiles in
/var/cache/distfiles. Layman overlays can stay where they are, or
move to /var/cache/layman.
Ulrich
Yeah +1 to that. Makes more sense to me
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like the
existing policy, bring it to the list with a better
attitude so we can try and discuss it. But given that you want to pick
a fight with your email, I will most likely ignore this
thread and keep doing our job like we do for many years.
--
Regards,
Markos
turned things over to some sort of interrim executive
committee... and I don't recall whether the events here predated what we
call council today, or not).
Sorry, this e-mail is huge for a topic like this. Please consider
breaking your thoughts into logical chunks.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
this attitude just for asking
hey are you there? do you still want to maintain all these packages?
any ETA on coming back. Seriously...
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
/retirement-second.txt
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 23 December 2012 09:57, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 22-12-2012 a las 13:53 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
On 12/22/2012 01:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22 December 2012 09:26, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
After seeing:
https://bugs.gentoo.org
On 23 December 2012 13:58, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
/var/log/portage/elog/$cat/$pf so people can
read these. Isn't this the same with what you suggest
On Dec 25, 2012 8:33 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (25 Dec 2012)
# Fails to build with libav-9 (#443238). Removal in a month.
media-libs/libdlna
media-video/ushare
This is not a valid reason to remove it. I use it every day. Please remove
the
On 26 December 2012 21:25, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 26-12-2012 a las 19:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El mié, 26-12-2012 a las 17:14 +, Markos Chandras escribió:
On Dec 25, 2012 8:33 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (25
On 27 December 2012 00:25, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 26/12/2012 23:19, Markos Chandras wrote:
To be honest, I see no reason for masking packages for removal because
they don't build with libav-9. I don't know much about libav-9 but to
my understanding it is supposed
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
of checkboxes for every
CC'd arch, and Arch Testers have privileges to select them if a
package works for their arch? This would eliminate the works on
$arch comments that flood the stabilization bugs.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
no proj page at all.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
Hi,
The following packages are up for grabs
app-cdr/daa2iso
app-cdr/gaffitter
app-laptop/prey
app-misc/recoll
app-backup/fsarchiver
media-libs/liblqr
net-news/canto
sys-apps/pyrenamer
I will drop them to maintainer-needed in ~10 days
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key
of people want them removed,
so I don't mind.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
: localRESULT:
command not found
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
provider?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
be preferred to start
a discussion in this mailing list (and/or cc'd gentoo-users). Ok since
you have tested the tree against libav, I see no problem with the
change but it is not my decision to make.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
build
on top of it. Let the other profiles enable the flags they need.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQ+GDSAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCTMoQAJIWJp7nBoIkMPXzQODQvUlL
these values (dropping the field might need a
change in the code) to reduce the number of selection a
newbie reporter is faced.
Yeah this field is not used (properly) and it should be removed.
Usually a bug in one profile, is also present in other
profiles as well.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
not appear to be one of these.
Having graphics support on such a profile is not expected. IMHO it
should be moved to the desktop profile
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On Jan 19, 2013 5:19 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:57:16 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Presently we already have a good number of split qt-* library packages
in x11-libs. With the arrival of Qt5 upstream has gone a lot further
in
this herd?
+1 and thanks for your work
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
if FEATURES contains binpkg or -B was passed to
emerge?/wild idea
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
...
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
/var/run
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=2chap=4
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 6 February 2013 13:55, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote:
I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are
using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is
no /var/run although some init
there be a mechanism of recreating it
on every boot if it's gone missing? At least until all init scripts
migrate to
/run.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 6 February 2013 15:30, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras
-Sampling-Plus-1.0- CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0
CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0 - CC-SA-1.0
In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort.
Ulrich
[1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/
Your plan makes sense to me, so +1
--
Regards,
Markos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/07/2013 05:00 PM, Ian Whyman wrote:
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
lets hope infra will ban him from the list
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
On 8 February 2013 02:27, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/07/2013 05:00 PM, Ian Whyman wrote:
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
lets hope infra
. Send a funny email to a list once.
//Peter
I think you are on the wrong list then.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On Feb 10, 2013 8:32 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed dwfr...@mtu.edu wrote:
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same
way
as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0
On 10 February 2013 14:06, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 14:34:14 schrieb Markos Chandras:
new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
On 10 February 2013 15:02, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:
I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
(since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
one). Moreover
+
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (11 Feb 2013)
# The 3 files from this package are part of the linux-firmware
# package now. Removal in 30 days.
Please also write an entry in the ChangeLog file as well.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
.
This one?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 13 February 2013 15:31, Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Michael Weber wrote:
On 02/13/2013 11:55 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml
still no hint what to do on expiration (as every single other
). It keeps high-quality
(because they are reviewed by devs and users before they appear in the
main branch) ebuilds that are not in portage tree. I think that the
sunrise devs would reject ebuilds that got removed from tree for
obvious reasons (dead upstream, broken etc etc)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 14 February 2013 16:37, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 14.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Markos Chandras:
On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote
Cheers
Tom
Why not 2011 and 2012 as well?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
of the problem. Yes it happens, not so rarely.
That's not a good argument. You can't stop people from using whatever
external sources they want. But you can easily
spot what they use from a simple eix -e broken-package or emerge
--info and close the bug as INVALID in the blink of an eye
--
Regards,
Markos
On 14 February 2013 19:26, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a):
Why not 2011 and 2012 as well?
Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository.
Ok I was just wondering if there was a reason you did not add them
along
unmerged by default.
Hm, can you expand on by default ?
When will it get unmerged then?
//Peter
I guess when nothing else depends on it or it is not in your world file
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
you think they are considered
'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in
my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable
keywords for them.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 07:43 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
First you need to tell us what arches you think they are
considered 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 08:40 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2013 20:22:00 Markos Chandras wrote:
I am not sure what are you trying to prove here.
I point out that there is not iso, no manual, no manpower.
No manual does not mean
is a good idea have a private conversation and then
drop an arch...
Drop an arch? Who said that? We are talking about moving arches to
~testing.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux
?
We will use qt* instead of qt-*[1] to match the way upstream names the
modules. So that would be dev-qt/qtcore etc
[1]:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Meeting/2013-01#2._Qt_category_move
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN
.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
listed in base/packages so every arch should have it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
didn't know it and I couldn't find any references
in the manpages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
if modules use
the headers in /usr/include/linux. It feel wrong to me
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (24 Feb 2013)
# Not functional as cia.vc is gone
# No maintainer, dead upstream, last bump in 2005
# See #445644. Removal in 30 days
dev-util/ciabot-svn
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
}/ginit.c init/ || die
Was this expected? Because it seems you omit the
busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch patch right now.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-interix ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x86-macos
~x86-solaris
IUSE=nls static-libs
DEPEND=sys-devel/flex
straight to stable? Not even keeping it to testing just for a week or so?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote:
On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02
Modified: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog
Log
On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 02 March 2013 20:50:17 Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote:
On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger wrote
On Mar 3, 2013 2:42 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
it just feels strange
I hear they call it getting stuff done..
//Peter
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
On 3 March 2013 12:01, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
it just feels strange
I hear they call it getting stuff done..
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
I explain to you what happened
getting stuff
On 3 March 2013 12:38, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
I explain to you what happened
getting stuff done is not an answer. I still don't understand why
stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
did that or just playing smart here?
To me
. This is
mainly for tracking purposes and we don't intend to take over the
maintainership of your packages (unless you want us to).
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux
On 5 March 2013 03:41, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
packages
I
am not sure why Diego wants more than 100 packages for the new
category.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
the package is properly maintained by him so
we never touch it.
Sounds fine. I
On 17 March 2013 13:47, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
the package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (17 Mar 2013)
# module is included in the mainline kernel.
# Enable CONFIG_TABLET_USB_WACOM to get it
# Bug #347892. Removal in 30 days
sys-kernel/linuxwacom-module
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Not possible to bump it anymore because it seems to depend
# on customized packages which are only available on Ubuntu
# Alternatives: net-im/qwit
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #388913
net-misc
1 - 100 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
