-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Quite a few buffer overflow and other bugs
# See #462366 #462224 #421717
# Removal in 30 days
app-text/cuneiform
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289)
# Problems with the alsa patches (#403389)
# Herd has not interest in it and needs a maintainer
# Removal in a month unless a new maintainer steps up
# and fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (23 Mar 2013)
# MSN service terminated.
# You can still use your MSN account in net-im/skype
# or switch to an open protocol instead
# Removal in 30 days
net-im/kmess
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (23 Mar 2013)
# MSN service terminated.
# You can still use your MSN account in net-im/skype
# or switch to an open protocol instead
# Removal in 30 days
net-im/amsn
x11-themes/amsn-skins
- --
Regards,
Markos
which
seems a bit contradictory to what we observe lately.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 23 March 2013 19:52, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
MC == Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org writes:
MC # Removal in 30 days
MC app-text/cuneiform
That one should not go. There are not enough quality ocr engines
available, Gentoo needs to keep all of them.
And a couple of bugs
here
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (23 Mar 2013)
# Dead upstream. No maintainer
# Does not seem to work anymore
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #457254
app-text/gonzui
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org
DVDs we
do from time to time than having these autobuilds around
that seem to break far too often.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/03/13 01:15, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289)
# Problems with the alsa patches (#403389
On Mar 24, 2013 1:19 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/03/13 01:15, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/24/2013 09:15 AM, Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:13:07 -0400 James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com
wrote:
MC == Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org writes:
MC The package is going away unless someone fixes the bugs and
MC
(say once every 2 months) and not following any ML, then what
can I do? The process for rescuing a package is documented here[1] and
it takes about 15'' of google searching to find it.
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/index.xml#doc_chap7
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/24/2013 12:18 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The process for rescuing a package is documented here[1] and it
takes about 15'' of google searching to find it.
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/24/2013 12:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 24/03/13 12:01, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 24, 2013 1:19 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 March
the
fixes on your behalf.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRTxGRXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/24/2013 12:40 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't mind adding that link to every package mask. Do note
thought that this is not the only way for a package
that make sense? (Obviously how many
months yellow is depends on what else happens in the tree. It's a
ballpark figure.)
No we don't have the human resources to do that.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
others. I'll look up the links.
If you have asked nicely I would. I don't track every single bug out there
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On Mar 24, 2013 8:25 PM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote:
And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
discussion again?
Can't this be restated as Shouldn't we tree clean it now since
On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote:
And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
discussion again?
Can't
be alternatives, but I'm not aware of
them.
We can suggest SRCD as an alternative just for the amd64/x86 isos
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 25 March 2013 17:12, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos
On 27 March 2013 12:55, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le samedi 23 mars 2013 à 10:46 +, Markos Chandras a écrit :
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (23 Mar 2013)
# MSN service terminated.
# You can still use your MSN account in net-im/skype
# or switch to an open
flags nowadays like rhythmbox, abiword,
etc.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org
Gentoo
Either way is fine for me. I don't mind extending the USE_EXPAND
variable but others may be skeptical about this.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461556
[3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
reading the message wrong?
In my mind, the message says either remove 70-* and setup 80-* or your
system will end up broken.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=net-p2p%2Fdeluge
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/index.xml
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 31 March 2013 12:23, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
net-p2p/deluge has open bugs for years[1] and I don't see anybody from
the net-p2p herd
to actually maintain it. It would be nice to find a new
58
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
kill it.
And next time be less commit-happy about adding packages, please.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Indeed. Nothing else seems to need it so just remove it asap.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
-mail and then you
claim you solved a problem without
mentioning what the problem was.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
times and it works just fine
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
130401 Markos Chandras wrote:
On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem.
Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry
On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
130401 Markos Chandras wrote:
On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
I have sent a msg
don't think we need to
debate the merits of the packages that are.
Rich
I couldn't agree more. It is getting really annoying having to debate
package removals every other day.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 2 April 2013 14:34, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:07:16 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 2 April 2013 13:48, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Alexis Ballier
aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
but what's
keep it, oh lets remove it discussion that it is about happen soon ;)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, Martin Dummer martin.dum...@gmx.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a question:
Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
Dustin Polke gentoobugsie.20.dsuraw...@spamgourmet.com
While the bug is easy to fix
On Apr 2, 2013 9:46 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:37:45 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, Martin Dummer martin.dum...@gmx.net wrote:
Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
Dustin Polke
On Apr 2, 2013 9:47 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 02/04/2013 22:37, Markos Chandras wrote:
The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
Some bugs take time to be fixed. Please be patient. We are just volunteers
here.
I would argue that we
On 2 April 2013 21:49, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Apr 2, 2013 9:47 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 02/04/2013 22:37, Markos Chandras wrote:
The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
Some bugs take time to be fixed
by an eclass) and/or when people keep a
separate .tar.* with all the patches. Debian
makes is so much easier to see what patches each package contains.
[1]http://patch-tracker.debian.org/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa directly if they
need?
udev will autoload the modules just fine even without touching the whole
file for PCI, USB, ... devices
all feedback appericiated
- Samuli
Go for it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass.
Thanks much. :-)
William
Am I the only one wondering why you didn't discuss this before you
submit a new eclass for review?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (12 May 2013)
# Does not build. Dead upstream. Bug #467286
# Removal in 30 days
dev-python/gdl-python
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP
://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org
[1] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/devmanual.git;a=summary
[2] https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/12/2013 02:15 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
The devmanual git repository[1] moved to github[2]. Please update
your local trees using the following command:
Developers: git remote set-url origin
will bother to update their config files
to push to two remotes. Can we?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRj7IjXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/12/2013 04:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
Earlier you said: Just to clarify, i never said I wanted to
deprecated the git.overlays.gentoo.org repo.
Have I missed something? Last time I looked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (19 May 2013)
# Unclear license. Bug #452418
# Removal in 30 days
x11-themes/pekwm-themes-hewphoria
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP
.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
for active maintainers to object. We just can't afford
waiting months for inactive maintainers to act.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
this process changes, because it has helped
bringing the stable tree up2date. However, given that *a few* people
don't like it, I suggest you don't file bugs for packages owned by
them.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
/0fmOLcgxxQnIQ79wzBWfF+RjNhcx3rt/wJBvFdiDkSm
=Ftge
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
I guess you could use pybugz + cron to do what you want.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 23 May 2013 19:49, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/05/13 02:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 23 May 2013 19:11, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Here's a new question on the robo-stable front -- I want to file a
bug
systemd.
I am very disappointed and confused.
You should have known me better by now.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux
://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2448/focus=2452
--
Thanks,
Zac
Looks good to me.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
this?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
- List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman
I agree.
If upstream inactivity is the only reason to remove it, then don't!
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 15 June 2013 15:33, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also || die does not work in subshells.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/error-handling/index.html
Sorry scratch that. I just realized || die is not inside the subshell
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux
, learn some social skill in
your free time.
Please both of you. Stop it now and take it elsewhere. Consider this a
friendly warning.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
and you must learn to behave
and respect each other even if you have different technical views.
We are all people sharing a common interest: Gentoo.
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/policy.xml#doc_chap2
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/coc.xml
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
you can delegate the technical tasks to them.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
special about there m-w bugs. They are
still unresolved bugs, for many years. No need to treat
them differently.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
module is one way to do it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
the version.
- If you're in the herd, you can add major features.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
This sounds pretty reasonable to me.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
of chapter
1. This rarely happens (I never
changed it since day 0). But if you want to put it on a git repo, I
need to rewrite it a bit because it is
not pretty as it is.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
their kernel and write their
boot loader config file initially, so why are we trying to dumb
this down?
William
There is no harm in providing alternatives.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
to shut it down before it even begins. For those that are not
interested in the idea of a video hangout, just don't use it and move on -
simple.
I like the idea. It might help bring developers and users closer.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-sources
will become heavily patched by external 3rd-party patches, it might
makes more
sense to recommend vanilla-sources to our users (handbook, etc).
I certainly don't feel safe anymore running non-upstream code in
production boxes.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
On 1 July 2013 20:09, Matthew Summers quantumsumm...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:38:48 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I certainly don't feel safe anymore running non-upstream code in
production
.
Why fonts team doesn't elect a new lead then? Thanks for the info :)
I am not sure how a new leader alone would help. The team needs active
members :)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-bin bzip2 ncurses sqlite ssl xml
# Michał Gorny mgo...@gentoo.org (26 Feb 2013)
# Meta-packages which use multilib ebuilds always install development
I don't understand that. Why not use +bzip2 +ncurses +sqlite +ssl +xml
in the ebuild?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
On 19 July 2013 16:46, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-07-19, o godz. 16:11:52
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 19 July 2013 16:04, Ian Delaney (idella4) idel...@gentoo.org wrote:
idella4 13/07/19 15:04:28
Modified: ChangeLog
This thread derailed as usual.
The kernel team made a decision. We can simply accept it and move on.
Stable keywords imply at least a minimal build and runtime testing by
arch teams.
Since we have no manpower to do it, then stabilizing them blindly is
not appropriate.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On Aug 3, 2013 10:06 AM, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 15:36 Fri 02 Aug , William Hubbs wrote:
All,
This message is an announcement and a reminder.
OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few days.
If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the
usually call that a constant. Now I get bored with your
trolling. Goodbye.
Lets stop this offtopic discussion pretty please.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
be PMS compatible and
since 'sets' are not part of PMS that means that it would be wise not
to use them yet.
It is unfortunate that nobody seems to have realized that all these
years that 2.2.X was masked :-/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
, is not a PMS problem. So unless it becomes
part of PMS, it can't be used in places where you expect PMS
compliance.
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for
Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
On 15 August 2013 00:42, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress
.
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
lost their net configs
So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
! Thanks a lot!
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
developers get rid of
old ebuilds and keep the portage tree healthy and reasonably updated.
If I get enough positive feedback on this, I will propose this in the
next Council's agenda.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
the user experience in the end.
For such arches, my personal opinion is that most people have been running ~arch
all along because stable was lagging so far behind.
Or no serious negative feedback. I don't think you will. I can support
this.
Thank you!
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux
On 21 August 2013 16:32, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
It's time of year again to consider moving a few arches to dev-only status.
I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords
- s390
, right ? Do these arches keep their stable mark in profiles.desc?
I am not familiar with portage internals to understand what
implications will an ~arch only architecture have if marked as stable.
Is there a good reason for that?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http
On 21 August 2013 20:10, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:03:30 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21 August 2013 19:28, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
Instead of dropping them entirely to ~arch, maybe something in
between could
On 22 August 2013 11:01, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22 August 2013 01:19, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote
On 22 August 2013 12:24, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22 August 2013 11:01, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think the result of a policy like this would be that stable keywords
would get dropped
them that for everything else, please use ~arch.
(I'm not saying that it doesn't hurt in some places, but it's
manageable, as is living on arches with stable core and very few stable
leave packages, like I've been doing on sparc, ppc and arm.)
This is yet to be decided.
--
Regards,
Markos
a bit weird. I presume the correct
one should be jbarto...@gentoo.org
Please read this
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/tools-reference/echangelog/index.html
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
I believe we discussed this here
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473946
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
portage from inheriting the same eclass twice instead
of handling this case in the eclass itself.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
there and
bring them on board.
The individual projects/team need to do that for us.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-r3 eclass without touching
the existing git-r2 compatible ebuilds? And why do you want to do that in
the first place? If the maintainer is happy with how git-r2 works with
his ebuilds
I see no reason to allow users to silently override that eclass.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux
On 3 September 2013 12:17, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-03, o godz. 11:53:22
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 3 September 2013 11:45, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello, all.
I'm attaching git-r3.eclass and a patch to git-2.eclass
feel he violated the perl@ team policies please consider
following the QA policy for such violations
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.html
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
101 - 200 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
