On 13 April 2013 22:30, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500 >> William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> > this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains >> > full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can query >> > pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths as >> > systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig. >> >> Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd >> A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching >> set of packages? >> >> If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply >> your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really >> want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You >> don't really have to play silly games like this. > > Ok, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass. > > Thanks much. :-) > > William >
Am I the only one wondering why you didn't discuss this before you submit a new eclass for review? -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
