---
eclass/python-r1.eclass | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/python-r1.eclass b/eclass/python-r1.eclass
index 929ec8fa8f89..549474630353 100644
--- a/eclass/python-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/python-r1.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2015 Gento
W dniu 02.03.2017, czw o godzinie 15∶09 +0100, użytkownik Michael
Haubenwallner napisał:
> On 01/21/2017 11:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Include arch/amd64/no-multilib in the hardened no-multilib amd64
> > variant. Confirmed with profile-dumper that it does not currently chan
# Michał Górny (04 Mar 2017)
# The program is abandoned upstream and reported to no longer work with
# Twitch and multiple other streaming sites. Working alternatives are
# net-misc/streamlink (which is a maintained fork) or media-video/orion.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #604858.
net-misc
on 3 instruction set
vfpv4 - Use the VFP version 4 instruction set
Please review the flags, test the code and let us know what you think of
it.
[1]:https://github.com/mgorny/cpuid2cpuflags/tree/arm-wip
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Merged, along with radhermit's patch.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
W dniu 26.02.2017, nie o godzinie 22∶54 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny
napisał:
> Fix python_wrapper_setup function to move setting environment variables
> for PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH outside the 'if'. Otherwise, they are only
> set on the initial invocation of python_wr
endency changes )
...which boils down to people having no clue what := actually means
and not caring to learn that before proposing awesome solutions.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
#x27;d also have to figure out some reasonable way to
suggest the upgrade first to ~arch users, then to stable.
What do you think?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The validate_desktop_entries function is redundant to the built-in
.desktop file checks done by Portage directly. It is used in total by
two packages for both of which bugs have been filed.
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclas
Split the estack_* and related functions from eutils into a dedicated
estack.eclass. Those functions have significant complexity and are not
used frequently, therefore they benefit from having a separate file
and an explicit dedicated maintainer.
The new eclass is implicitly inherited by eutils to
Move epatch and epatch_user (along with the descriptions for all their
variables) into a dedicated epatch.eclass. This function is very
complex, therefore it benefits from separate eclass and a dedicated
maintainer. Furthermore, it is mostly obsoleted by eapply* in EAPI 6.
The new eclass is implic
W dniu 11.03.2017, sob o godzinie 09∶04 -0500, użytkownik Michael
Orlitzky napisał:
> On 03/11/2017 08:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > However, the inherit will be removed in EAPI 7
> >
> > ...
> >
> > -inherit estack multilib toolchain-funcs
> &
Split the estack_* and related functions from eutils into a dedicated
estack.eclass. Those functions have significant complexity and are not
used frequently, therefore they benefit from having a separate file
and an explicit dedicated maintainer.
The new eclass is implicitly inherited by eutils to
Move epatch and epatch_user (along with the descriptions for all their
variables) into a dedicated epatch.eclass. This function is very
complex, therefore it benefits from separate eclass and a dedicated
maintainer. Furthermore, it is mostly obsoleted by eapply* in EAPI 6.
The new eclass is implic
The multilib.eclass seems not to be used by any eutils function.
Therefore, disable the inherit for EAPI 7. It is being preserved for
older EAPIs not to break ebuilds inheriting this eclass and using
multilib.eclass functions implicitly.
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 inserti
W dniu 11.03.2017, sob o godzinie 21∶49 -0500, użytkownik Rich Freeman
napisał:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:34:20 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > 1. classic forks -- package B is forked out of A, and
variable?
>
> On mgorny post I read that get_libdir function is part of EAPI, but I
> don't understand how this means. I use portage-2.3.4.
>
This means that you can use it without inheriting any eclass. It's
provided by portage directly.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signat
without asking first. Just because some project didn't
mind being backup/advisory maintainer for your package doesn't mean that
it wants to maintain it by itself.
Any comments?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
related to
> a wrong version of some packages?
If you are attempting to use it in global scope (i.e. outside phase
functions), then it won't work. Such a use is forbidden since it would
mean that global variables differ depending on profile being used.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
sig
Split the estack_* and related functions from eutils into a dedicated
estack.eclass. Those functions have significant complexity and are not
used frequently, therefore they benefit from having a separate file
and an explicit dedicated maintainer.
The new eclass is implicitly inherited by eutils to
*.la' -print0)
-
- if [[ ${queue[@]} ]]; then
- rm -f "${queue[@]}"
- fi
-}
-
# @FUNCTION: optfeature
# @USAGE: [other atoms]
# @DESCRIPTION:
diff --git a/eclass/ltprune.eclass b/eclass/ltprune.eclass
new file mode 100644
index ..731
Changes in v2:
- now in split commits to ease review,
- removed eqawarn to avoid circ dep on eutils.
Remove the unnecessary Prefix logic from prune_libtool_files(). There is
no functional difference between starting a find in ${D} and ${ED}
(since ${D} is not supposed to contain other directories on a Prefix
system), and using the latter implies unnecessary hackery for older
EAPIs.
---
eclass/eut
Make the substitution errors in prune_libtool_files logic fatal to avoid
the dependency of eqawarn. They're extremely unlikely to happen anyway.
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
index ab2
if [[ ${reason} ]]; then
- einfo "Removing unnecessary ${f#${D%/}} (${reason})"
- queue+=( "${f}" )
- fi
- done < <(find "${D}" -xtype f -name '*.la' -print0)
-
- if [[ ${queue[@]} ]]; then
-
W dniu 12.03.2017, nie o godzinie 12∶35 +0100, użytkownik Alexis Ballier
napisał:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:00:08 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Make the substitution errors in prune_libtool_files logic fatal to
> > avoid the dependency of eqawarn. They're ex
W dniu 14.03.2017, wto o godzinie 17∶19 -0700, użytkownik Jack Morgan
napisał:
>
> On 01/19/17 09:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> > (CC-ing a lot of potentially interested teams)
> >
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > I've did a quick sweep of profiles/ directory f
Convert the usage of eblits in sys-devel/autoconf into an equivalent
eclass. This makes the ebuilds more readable, more predictable and fixes
compliance with stricter versions of the package manager (i.e. a future
release of Portage).
---
eclass/toolchain-autoconf.eclass | 70 +++
ll fix that now
and test it as well.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Convert the usage of eblits in sys-devel/autoconf into an equivalent
eclass. This makes the ebuilds more readable, more predictable and fixes
compliance with stricter versions of the package manager (i.e. a future
release of Portage).
// changes in v2: fixed phase function call in -
---
eclas
//
note: i'm in process of testing [building binpkgs] of all glibc versions
to confirm i didn't accidentally break anything. - fails in compile
phase both before and after the change.
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 1404 +++
sys-libs/glibc/files/ebli
stopped diverting this thread. If you
don't have anything to add regarding the patch in question, then please
hesitate from commenting.
If you love eblits that much, then please take appropriate measures to
get them into the next EAPI. Because so far your non-productive comments
on any effort of cleaning this mess up reach the level of pure
trolling.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On pią, 2017-03-17 at 14:57 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Done.
It's nice that you waited for people to actually wake up around
the world to give you feedback.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Split the epunt_cxx (plus internal code) to a dedicated eclass. This is
rarely needed, usually indicates a dead upstream and requires
the ELT-patches framework. The patches are going to be split to
a separate package, and the new eclass will therefore need to DEPEND
on it. We do not want the depend
we need to apply it elsewhere?]; disable explicit
libtoolize when Portage supports that.
4. when new Portage goes stable, start killing libtool.eclass.
Any comments?
[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566424
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
this passes review positively, I will create a git.g.o repository
for ELT-patches.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
---
eclass/libtool.eclass | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/libtool.eclass b/eclass/libtool.eclass
index a8df6ca58fef..037a6a2734df 100644
--- a/eclass/libtool.eclass
+++ b/eclass/libtool.eclass
@@ -16,18 +16,10 @@
if [[ -z ${_LIBTOOL_ECLAS
---
app-portage/elt-patches/Manifest| 1 +
app-portage/elt-patches/elt-patches-20170317.ebuild | 21 +
app-portage/elt-patches/metadata.xml| 7 +++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 app-portage/elt-patches/Manifest
On pią, 2017-03-17 at 15:47 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > ---
> > eclass/libtool.eclass | 14 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/eclass/libtool.eclass
On pią, 2017-03-17 at 23:38 +, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:14:12 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > Since the bug about libtool.eclass [1] has not received any attention, I
> > hereby declare maintainer timeout and s
On sob, 2017-03-11 at 14:06 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> The validate_desktop_entries function is redundant to the built-in
> .desktop file checks done by Portage directly. It is used in total by
> two packages for both of which bugs have been filed.
> ---
> eclass/eutils.eclass |
On sob, 2017-03-11 at 16:03 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Move epatch and epatch_user (along with the descriptions for all their
> variables) into a dedicated epatch.eclass. This function is very
> complex, therefore it benefits from separate eclass and a dedicated
> maintainer. Furthe
On sob, 2017-03-11 at 16:07 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> The multilib.eclass seems not to be used by any eutils function.
> Therefore, disable the inherit for EAPI 7. It is being preserved for
> older EAPIs not to break ebuilds inheriting this eclass and using
> multilib.ecla
On nie, 2017-03-12 at 11:13 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Split the estack_* and related functions from eutils into a dedicated
> estack.eclass. Those functions have significant complexity and are not
> used frequently, therefore they benefit from having a separate file
> and an explic
On nie, 2017-03-12 at 12:00 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Changes in v2:
> - now in split commits to ease review,
> - removed eqawarn to avoid circ dep on eutils.
>
Merged.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On sob, 2017-03-18 at 11:18 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:53:31 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > 3. copy elibtoolize logic to Portage, and make it apply implicitly
> > > > on econf [do we need to apply it elsewhere?]; disable explicit
&
ea of PMS instead.
Don't you find it a bad hypocritical that at the same time you oppose
committing an eclass for a single package and you support committing
an eclass to support half-working hack for a single package?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The parallel econf code is used only with USE=static-libs, and even in
that case provides negligible speed gain. At the same time, it adds
a lot of complexity, causes the build logs to be unreadable mix of
output from both configure scripts and violates PMS by calling econf
in parallel which can ca
Remove the parallel econf logic that adds a lot of complexity for minor
gain. It results in the output from different configure scripts being
mixed in the build log, making it unreadable. It causes econf to be run
in a subshell which is a PMS violation and can cause issues with some of
package mana
On pon, 2017-03-20 at 22:12 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:24:58 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On pon, 2017-03-20 at 18:01 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > What makes me wonder more are the proposed solutions: So far the
> > > on
On pon, 2017-03-20 at 21:12 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2017 20:35, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Remove the parallel econf logic that adds a lot of complexity for minor
> > gain. It results in the output from different configure scripts being
> > mixed in the
Use --cache-file to reuse the previous check results in the subsequent
configure script runs. This gives a major speed advantage (beating the
previous parallel runs) and significant CPU savings.
---
sys-libs/ncurses/ncurses-6.0-r1.ebuild | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
//
Since this does not affect existing ebuilds, I'd like to apply it along
with the epunt-cxx patch to avoid two major cache regens a week ;-).
---
eclass/epatch.eclass | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/epatch.eclass b/eclass/epatch.eclass
index fb0a10b53583..905f68f8e
On wto, 2017-03-21 at 17:05 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:46:43 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Use --cache-file to reuse the previous check results in the subsequent
> > configure script runs. This gives a major speed advantage (beating the
>
On wto, 2017-03-21 at 17:55 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:30:29 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On wto, 2017-03-21 at 17:05 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:46:43 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
ot accept them, we can't do
anything about it. You can claim we ought to explain till the maintainer
is convinced but I think we both know that nobody's going to convince
anyone, and the only result would be stalling the change for even more
than the 9 months so far.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Alike the PMS-defined phases, sub-phases do not support leaving jobs
behind. To avoid leaving something accidentally, make sure to reap all
jobs (i.e. wait) post running the command. Warn if any stray processes
are found since that indicates a bug in ebuild.
---
eclass/multibuild.eclass | 12 +
On czw, 2017-03-23 at 19:52 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:53:25 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On czw, 2017-03-23 at 10:51 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:41:39 +0100
> > > "Andreas K. Huettel" wr
in SRC_URI ;-).
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of the (independent)
effort on fixing PMS violations.
Rationale + vote: https://bugs.gentoo.org/612630
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On pią, 2017-03-17 at 17:57 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Split the epunt_cxx (plus internal code) to a dedicated eclass. This is
> rarely needed, usually indicates a dead upstream and requires
> the ELT-patches framework. The patches are going to be split to
> a separate package,
On wto, 2017-03-21 at 17:07 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> //
>
> Since this does not affect existing ebuilds, I'd like to apply it along
> with the epunt-cxx patch to avoid two major cache regens a week ;-).
>
> ---
> eclass/epatch.eclass | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2
On pią, 2017-03-17 at 19:48 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a quick patch serie that moves the whole ELT-patches directory
> into a separate package. This reduces the size of Gentoo checkout
> by ~500 KiB.
>
> The nocxx patches are left for epunt_cxx to b
On czw, 2017-03-16 at 10:38 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Convert the usage of eblits in sys-devel/autoconf into an equivalent
> eclass. This makes the ebuilds more readable, more predictable and fixes
> compliance with stricter versions of the package manager (i.e. a future
> releas
On czw, 2017-03-16 at 14:49 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> //
> note: i'm in process of testing [building binpkgs] of all glibc versions
> to confirm i didn't accidentally break anything. - fails in compile
> phase both before and after the change.
>
> ---
>
Use local variable to limit the scope of ABI variable override. This is
a builtin bash solution that is reliable and simple, unlike the complex
evar_* logic that unnecessarily pollutes global variables.
---
eclass/toolchain-glibc.eclass | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
dif
---
eclass/tests/estack_eshopts.sh | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/tests/estack_eshopts.sh b/eclass/tests/estack_eshopts.sh
index 606a17cfb053..28346c65ec13 100755
--- a/eclass/tests/estack_eshopts.sh
+++ b/eclass/tests/estack_eshopts.sh
@@ -27,6
Use 'shopt -p -o' to obtain the current set of 'set' flags, and to
restore them on popping. Unlike $-, it is output in command form (alike
'shopt -p'), removing the need for separate logic in eshopts_pop.
---
eclass/estack.eclass | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff
---
eclass/enlightenment.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass b/eclass/enlightenment.eclass
index 4a30b7e4c120..ae7bb396590c 100644
--- a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass
+++ b/eclass/enlightenment.eclass
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
if [[ -z ${_ENL
---
eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass
index 365d15f4bf06..f8d2c7fdc247 100644
--- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-
---
eclass/git-r3.eclass | 8 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/git-r3.eclass b/eclass/git-r3.eclass
index 1b49f66f5f00..bc7d4d920299 100644
--- a/eclass/git-r3.eclass
+++ b/eclass/git-r3.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation
+#
# Michał Górny (27 Mar 2017)
# No revdeps or real use case. Uses ECB mode for encryption which is
# a bad idea. Requires patching for dev-python/pycryptodome. Abandoned
# upstream and downstream. Removal in 30 days. Bug #611592.
dev-python/edpwd
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
y proposal would be to use the following set once their
support reaches the stable version of Portage:
manifest-hashes = SHA512 SHA3-512 WHIRLPOOL
Your thoughts?
[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/612716
[2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/611568
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
al OS", or how is it possible on Earth that GOST algos was
> implemented in portage? :)
>
I think the point was more like it's unfair to give NSA backdoors
without giving one to KGB as well.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/588206
[2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/468854
[3]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/465684
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, but all 3.4. So I will stick
>to 3.4 till everything is at 3.6. Otherwise no point and still have
>other versions.
>
>The approach mentioned above, if the packages do not have issue. I
>could go ahead and switch to ruby24 and pyton 3.6 across the board.
>Which I cannot do now till
On pon, 2017-04-10 at 12:03 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:37:34 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > It is always nice when a person who:
>
> Starts off with insults and rudeness... Why I avoid you and I have
> requested MULITPLE time
nks for wine are managed with app-eselect/eselect-wine.
> # eselect wine set wine-vanilla-2.0
> /usr/bin/wine -> /usr/bin/wine-vanilla-2.0
> # eselect wine set --staging wine-staging-2.4
> /usr/bin/wine-staging -> /usr/bin/wine-staging-2.4
So, the whole idea is that you can install v
On pon, 2017-04-10 at 15:21 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > It is always nice when a person who:
>
> Please stop the sarcasm. While I understand the reaction, the idea in
> itself does not seem totally crazy to me, and
alternative
> way. Absolutely nothing constructive.
>
Finally, since you seem to be completely resistant to do at least some
basic research, and you keep trying to prove that I'm some developer who
is barely doing anything, lemme tell you a funny thing: I wrote these
eclasses, I designed this model and I was responsible for switching it
from opt-out to opt-in.
But then, all that work was obviously non-constructive, unlike reviving
the topic on the mailing list without doing any research or simply
asking the person who did it.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On pon, 2017-04-10 at 13:52 -0400, NP-Hardass wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 01:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > So, the whole idea is that you can install vanilla and e.g. staging
> > side-by-side?
>
> That's 50% of it. The other 50% is that since Windows applications
> ofte
es on with the
> status quo
>
You are talking *nonsense*. The python-r1 was *against* status quo. We
changed it. Now you want the old status quo back.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
his every step to have
his system boot again.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sed the users for which it works out of
the box... obviously they're not a proper Gentoo users if they don't
break their system and then complain that Gentoo is doing everything
wrong because they can break their systems.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On pon, 2017-04-10 at 17:33 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:43:18 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > The difference is in quality expectations. We did Python this way to
> > make sure things will work, and all obvious breakage will immedia
Officially list the slot="" attribute that is used in GLSAs for quite
some time in the DTD. It is supported by Portage and gentoolkit for
a long time, and was used in GLSAs interchangeably with implicit
appended ':slot' to the version. However, the latter was ugly and worked
only by accident, so we
d. :)
>
> This keeps the benefits of *_COMPAT and *_TARGETS while allowing
> people to test a new python/php/ruby interpreter without having to
> manually edit dozens (potentially hundreds or thousands) of ebuilds.
>
It's already there, called PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On śro, 2017-04-12 at 01:57 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, T, 11.04.2017 kell 22:10, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> > ---
> > glsa.dtd | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/glsa.dtd b/glsa.dtd
> >
Officially list the slot="" attribute that is used in GLSAs for quite
some time in the DTD. It is supported by Portage and gentoolkit for
a long time, and was used in GLSAs interchangeably with implicit
appended ':slot' to the version. However, the latter was ugly and worked
only by accident, so we
On sob, 2017-03-25 at 12:43 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> ---
> eclass/git-r3.eclass | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/git-r3.eclass b/eclass/git-r3.eclass
> index 1b49f66f5f00..bc7d4d920299 100644
> --- a/eclass/git-r3.
On sob, 2017-03-25 at 12:37 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> ---
> eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass
> index 365d15f4bf06..f8d2c7fdc247 100
On pią, 2017-03-24 at 23:08 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> ---
> eclass/enlightenment.eclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass b/eclass/enlightenment.eclass
> index 4a30b7e4c120..ae7bb396590c 100
On pią, 2017-03-24 at 21:44 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Use local variable to limit the scope of ABI variable override. This is
> a builtin bash solution that is reliable and simple, unlike the complex
> evar_* logic that unnecessarily pollutes global variables.
> ---
> e
On pią, 2017-03-24 at 22:01 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> ---
> eclass/tests/estack_eshopts.sh | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
Both merged.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On czw, 2017-03-23 at 18:55 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Alike the PMS-defined phases, sub-phases do not support leaving jobs
> behind. To avoid leaving something accidentally, make sure to reap all
> jobs (i.e. wait) post running the command. Warn if any stray processes
> are foun
Replace the unnecessary use of extglob to strip file suffix
in make_desktop_entry with a plain ${x%.*}. This is pretty much
equivalent since match to one of the pre-defined suffixes is already
confirmed via the preceding conditional, and avoiding repeating
the suffix list twice makes the code simpl
Stop inheriting the epunt-cxx eclass in eutils implicitly. All the uses
in ::gentoo are fixed already, and this lets us add extra dependencies
in the eclass without affecting most of the packages out there.
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --gi
Now that epunt-cxx.eclass is using the patches from
app-portage/elt-patches, remove the remaining patches from
the repository.
---
eclass/ELT-patches/nocxx/nocxx-2.64.patch | 13 -
eclass/ELT-patches/nocxx/nocxx.patch | 15 ---
2 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
delete
Now that eutils does not inherit epunt-cxx implicitly, we can reverse
the inherit without having circular dependencies.
---
eclass/epunt-cxx.eclass | 10 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/epunt-cxx.eclass b/eclass/epunt-cxx.eclass
index 660b1d138fac..b
Switch to using the patches provided through the app-portage/elt-patches
package, like libtool.eclass. Since epunt-cxx is no longer implicit
eutils API but a dedicated eclass, we do not have to worry about
the extra dependency.
---
eclass/epunt-cxx.eclass | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 2 i
601 - 700 of 7475 matches
Mail list logo
