Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: open season on robbat2's packages

2013-10-30 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wednesday 30 of October 2013 22:10:27 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Packages for tree-cleaner consideration: > dev-vcs/gitosis > dev-vcs/gitosis-gentoo Kill them, gitolite is the proper replacement Theo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-08-25 23h59 UTC

2013-08-26 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday, August 26, 2013 00:25:01 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > from the tree, for the week ending 2013-08-25 23h59 UTC. These mails are not going through gentoo-dev-announce any more, I suppose because they don't have proper

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org

2013-06-11 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:20:20 Sven Vermeulen wrote: > "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Alex Legler wrote: > >> - Projects: Use a GuideXML-to-Wikisyntax conversion tool to create an > >> > >> initial wiki version of the document > > > >What is the current stat

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Bugzilla maintenance

2013-05-23 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Thursday 23 of May 2013 23:51:33 Christian Ruppert wrote: > and getsatisfaction.com. far from what I expected :( signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites; dev-python/{etsdevtools,blockcanvas,envisagecore}

2013-05-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sunday 12 of May 2013 23:21:15 IAN DELANEY wrote: > # Ian Delaney (12 May 2013) > # Recommended by upstream's own maintainer to drop the > # package, no longer valid. > # Masked for removal in 30 days > dev-python/etsdevtools > > # Ian Delaney (12 May 2013) > # Recommended by upstream's own m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual moved to github

2013-05-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sunday 12 of May 2013 19:20:03 Peter Stuge wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: > > Gerrit > > .. > > I've never used it myself but I'm tempted to install it just to > > start messing with it personally. > > Go for it! It's a few steps to set up, but it's not too bad. > > Michael Palimaka wrote: > > I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites; dev-python/{etsdevtools,blockcanvas,envisagecore}

2013-05-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sunday 12 of May 2013 23:21:15 IAN DELANEY wrote: > # Ian Delaney (12 May 2013) > # Recommended by upstream's own maintainer to drop the > # package, no longer valid. > # Masked for removal in 30 days > dev-python/etsdevtools > > # Ian Delaney (12 May 2013) > # Recommended by upstream's own m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Forming Gentoo Policy - Copyright Assignment and Attribution

2013-03-11 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 11 of March 2013 14:19:55 Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined, > > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license > > agreement and an option to also s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Bugday

2013-02-27 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 22:28:13 Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 27/02/2013 11:39, Pavlos Ratis wrote: > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> I would like to announce you a new try to 'revive' the Bugday event. > >> As most of the open source p

Re: [gentoo-dev] !!! ERROR !!!

2013-02-08 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Live a little. Send a funny email to a list once. aight boss

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: >>> app-admin/augeas >>> app-admin/puppet >>> dev-ml/ocaml-augeas >>> dev-python/py

[gentoo-dev] lastrites in gentoo-dev-announce only

2013-01-27 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Hello, how about sending the lastrites announcements in gentoo-dev-announce only? Theo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages

2013-01-23 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > Second reason, I believe it is getting or already has deployment on > gentoo infra servers. euscan is not getting implemented on infra server because noone requested it. Again, whoever is responsible for any service and wants it implemented i

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates >> for January. >> >> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the >> same time I also received

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-01-20 23h59 UTC

2013-01-21 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > from the tree, for the week ending 2013-01-20 23h59 UTC. How about sending those mails to gentoo-dev-announce only? Theo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-31 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 31 of December 2012 16:46:53 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 30 December 2012 00:13, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: > >> On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric wrote: > >> > Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some "Inbound" > >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-29 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 29 of December 2012 11:32:45 Michael Mol wrote: > Certainly a sidetrack: I would like to point out that Github now > supports "Organizations" as a semantic concept. I *highly* recommend > using something like that over using an 'individual' account as an > organization. > > I've been u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 12/12/2012 19:07, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: >> It would be preferred to move that package in tree though. > > I don't like it. Please use an overlay to test this kind of stuff, thanks. Thank you all for the feedb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:07:09 +0100 > Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > >> these days I am working on a puppet module for portage. For testing I >> have created a dummy package which can be found here [1]. The package >&

[gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Hello, these days I am working on a puppet module for portage. For testing I have created a dummy package which can be found here [1]. The package installs files based on useflags, and it comes in stable, testing and hardmasked versions, plus it has some useflag changes between versions. With this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh Organizations - Gentoo Linux

2012-11-28 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up. > > This has been setup (with Donnie's help): > > https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo > > I've claimed 15 of the pr

[gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-24 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Hello, We currently have values like the following: RUBY_TARGETS="ruby19" PHP_TARGETS="php5-3" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" I find it confusing, and I would like to propose to keep the same style for all the above values. I personally prefer the ruby one. Keep in mind that if the relevant teams de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Merging the devrel handbook into the devmanual

2012-10-31 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi all, > > In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2] into > the devmanual[3]. > > As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of > development information. I believe consolidation of this info

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package ranking by number of ebuilds on the portage tree

2012-10-26 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > So I have been doing some bash scripting out of some comment in a > conversation to count (and rank) the packages by the number of ebuilds > they have (and thus of versions of said package). The results can be > se

Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS -> git, list of where non-infra folk can contribute

2012-10-02 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tuesday 02 of October 2012 12:58:04 Ben de Groot wrote: > Thank you so much for taking the time to give us this clear list of > things that need to be done to take this forward! Disclaimer: I haven't read Brian's long mail (and most of the mails in this mailing list for the past month) One of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recruitment process is moving back to quizzes

2012-07-15 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 14 of July 2012 10:32:04 Markos Chandras wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Dear Gentoo Community, > > If you are not a recruit, mentor, or wannabe mentor you may stop > reading now. > > We (recruiters) decided to revert back to the quizzes for the > recru

[gentoo-dev] Re: Short bugzilla outage today between 2100-2200 UTC

2012-07-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > All, > > bugs.gentoo.org will be down for 30 minutes sometime between 2100 and 2200 > UTC. We are migrating the database replication to newer and faster boxes. > Apologies for the short notice. We'll let y

[gentoo-dev] Short bugzilla outage today between 2100-2200 UTC

2012-07-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
All, bugs.gentoo.org will be down for 30 minutes sometime between 2100 and 2200 UTC. We are migrating the database replication to newer and faster boxes. Apologies for the short notice. We'll let you know with a newer announcement when it is finished. the Gentoo Infrastructure team signature.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new global useflag libass

2012-06-15 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > Hi, > > As per the discussion in bug #328245, we would like to propose a > new global useflag, to replace both ass and libass local useflags > currently in media-video/{ffmpeg,mplayer,mplayer2,vlc}. > > The proposed description is the one alre

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400 >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: >> > > Since

[gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Ahoj, log from #gentoo-portage: zmedico: (random idea) would it make sence to generate local.use.desc in /var/cache, or somewhere in /var, but out of the tree? because now cvs sees it as unknown file, which prints out warning in update and collision in commit (commit in profile/ ) tampakrap: h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-06-13 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > 2) dev-vcs/qsvn > 3) kde-misc/kcometen4 > 4) kde-misc/kgrubeditor > 5) kde-misc/plasmatvgr > 6) kde-misc/kanyremote > 8) media-gfx/smile > 9) media-gfx/pictureflow > 10) media-sound/qpitch > 11) media-sound/qtagger > 12) media-video/avidem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't update/checkout gentoo-x86 repo

2011-04-07 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Thursday 07 of April 2011 15:06:37 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > Patrick already reported the issue in #gentoo-infra but unfortunately there > is none available at the moment with root access in flycatcher, please be > patient The issue is now fixed. The file somehow got corrupted on t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't update/checkout gentoo-x86 repo

2011-04-07 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
, it isn't just me then. I was going to try a clean checkout as > well, but I'll wait until I see how this turns out. > > - Aaron Patrick already reported the issue in #gentoo-infra but unfortunately there is none available at the moment with root access in flycatcher, please

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: Portage should not mask packages globally, but only for some arches

2011-02-02 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
ully no one will read more > into it than there is. For the record, Kacper told me today that every developer is allowed to touch ppc/ppc64 profiles. Archies that don't want others to touch their profiles should mention it in the devmanual. I was not aware of that, I thought that !arc

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-src cvs repo and svn repos migration to git

2011-01-30 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 31 January 2011 04:54:47 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > Hello, > > I decided to start migrating some CVS and SVN repos to git. First I should > do a cleanup though, and see which ones are still active. > 1) gentoo-src [1] cvs repo contains a number of projects separated t

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-src cvs repo and svn repos migration to git

2011-01-30 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
to point me out the ones that are still active, and you (the maintainer(s)) want to be migrated to git. In that case, I'll contact you for any additional info I will need, such as the structure of the git repo or any hooks I should be aware of. Thanks -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming changes to hosting of Git repos on git.gentoo.org (NOT overlays.git.gentoo.org)

2011-01-25 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:06:06 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 01/22/11 13:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > Well, the distinction for unofficial/official overlays happen mostly in > > layman -L, I don't think users pay attention to our git repo list. > > Further

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming changes to hosting of Git repos on git.gentoo.org (NOT overlays.git.gentoo.org)

2011-01-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 22 January 2011 18:02:59 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Why not provide a tree for overlays and another for application > repositories? You just repeated my proposal, with the only difference I splitted project from website :P -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming changes to hosting of Git repos on git.gentoo.org (NOT overlays.git.gentoo.org)

2011-01-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
t doesn't suit our needs we'll proceed in trying something else, but this is totally offtopic, please stick to the topic. -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming changes to hosting of Git repos on git.gentoo.org (NOT overlays.git.gentoo.org)

2011-01-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
user needs the multimedia overlay to get multimedia ebuilds, or the kde overlay to install kde. For the second part of your question, Ryan's responce is perfect. -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming changes to hosting of Git repos on git.gentoo.org (NOT overlays.git.gentoo.org)

2011-01-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
e/, you are right. In project/ belongs anything that is not a *.g.o subdomain, and is not an overlay (SOC projects, upstream projects (portage, gorg, rbot*, znurt), forks (gitolite-gentoo)) > > [1] We intend on having public infra repos as well, and just having the > fewest priva

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming changes to hosting of Git repos on git.gentoo.org (NOT overlays.git.gentoo.org)

2011-01-21 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
- (repo2).git - ... overlay - project (instead of proj) - sunrise.git - kde.git - ... - personal (merge dev/ & user/) - aballier.git - alexxy.git - ... website - blogs.git - planet.git - forums.git - gstats.git - packages.git - www.git (the gentoo cvs repo) - .

Re: [gentoo-dev] On hosting self-produced distfiles

2011-01-19 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
r on what to do with his custom tarballs. -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hardened is planning on restructuring its profiles

2010-11-06 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
lex inheritance structure), we'd like any feedback or > caveats before we proceed. > > Anthony G. Basile (blueness) > and the hardened team News item please -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going inactive

2010-09-28 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
ught me something or helped with my projects. I > learned a huge amount through this distro and community. > > Cya around! > Daniel Thank you for all your work and especially on Planet. Due to the migration to a new box I saw quickly all the effort you put at it and was awesome. -- T

Re: [gentoo-dev] What the hell is going on here?

2010-09-17 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
fore > sending an email like this. We do respect Arfrever's motivation, we just > need to make sure it translates to good, trustworthy work. If we didn't, > his request to return to Gentoo would have been denied. and I don't agree with this part, no need to say anything

[gentoo-dev] Re: Git.overlays.gentoo.org currently unavailable

2010-07-20 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > I did a stupid typo in gitosis, which kinda broke it, and I can't > commit the fix. Infra guys are away at the moment. I guess it will be > fixed as soon as someone of them gets back online. I'm terribly sorry >

[gentoo-dev] Git.overlays.gentoo.org currently unavailable

2010-07-20 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
I did a stupid typo in gitosis, which kinda broke it, and I can't commit the fix. Infra guys are away at the moment. I guess it will be fixed as soon as someone of them gets back online. I'm terribly sorry for the noise

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: >  What about getting rid of -project? > > V-Li WHAT? Why??

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-17 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls as > Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. Which > ML do we want to use? I guess Brian posted on gentoo-dev as this usually happens

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council manifesto for jmbsvicetto

2010-06-29 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Please feel free to ask any questions you'd like to be answered. 1) Is it possible an election official to run for the council? If so, I think this should change 2) Why did you mention that you were KDE HT Leader, but you didn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
end for my uni thesis, and the ldap library for python was working very well, so I would like to help on that. -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE, Qt, SGML, Overlays, Planet Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
he overlays team only. Furthermore, access to overlays is granted to non-developers as well, so either way it isn't easier for us -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE, Qt, SGML, Overlays, Planet Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-10 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
aliases to LDAP? We'd lose comments :-(. +1 on that too -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE, Qt, SGML, Overlays, Planet Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass

2010-04-18 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 19 April 2010 00:10:15 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > There are two eclasses for Qt: qt4.eclass and qt4-r2.eclass > > Which one should I inherit? We have a guide for writing Qt4 ebuilds -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc De

[gentoo-dev] New gnome and kde subprofiles

2010-03-29 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
The change is now committed, please test and report any problems. Thanks -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-23 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 08 March 2010 03:17:57 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > Hello > > I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. > > The result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-13 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 12 March 2010 19:39:48 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 12 March 2010 10:48, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > First of all, I'll delay the commit since I need to write documentation > > patches, and I won't be able, as I'll leave soon for a conference and > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
useflags and unexpected -- newuse results. (btw I already announced it once in my blog, I will do it again, and we'll also provide a news item, so I doubt this is even a real problem as well). To sum up: 1) Not oblious to me? / Not bad from my point of view? 2) I doubt users will be confl

[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-07 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > Hello > I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The > result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] > I splitted every desktop/ folder i found. The following issues raised &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
ss the important thing is to make it known to people that are already using the desktop profile. Still, a small reference can be made to handbook, but just a small one, as people that are going to install KDE or GNOME should refer the relevant installation guides. I don't know, Nightmorph h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
send a doc patch for the gnome and xorg docs. I already blogged about it, and will write the news item. I suppose those are more than enough. Thanks for pointing that out -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item for removal of 2008.0 and old hardened profiles

2010-03-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
ted from svn -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde-crazy.git;a=summary -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams blog.tampakrap.gr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-desktop] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2010-02-25 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
ments, suggestions, important notices regarding this > > change, please keep discussion in gentoo-desktop mailing list. > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > regards > > MM > > Three months later... Why has this not been implemented yet? > > Cheers, Just for the record, I will do this tomorrow. Thanks -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE Team signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE Team meeting November 2009

2009-11-17 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
One more issue about the Qt: Lower the msgs in qt-* ebuilds. There are too many and ppl may loose the important ones. I propose to add more info in our guides etc -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 LiveDVD release enhancements

2009-08-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Maybe some Gentoo/GNOME Gentoo/KDE Gentoo/otherDEorWM wallpapers/logos/icons? I have some Gentoo/KDE wallpapers and logos that could be used. Or do we prefer strictly Gentoo anniversary artwork? On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Fernando V Orocu (likewhoa) has been working

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-02 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
commited, thank you all for the suggestions and the translations. I'll have to ask again though, is it possible to have it in the main site as well? in fact, who is in charge for the main site? gdp maybe? On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:50:29 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Thursday 02 July

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-02 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:27:34 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hallo, > > Theo Chatzimichos : > > If there are no further objections, and if I have the OK from Jorge > > i'll commit the following tonight > > Fine by me. > > > Also, you can send me tran

[gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-02 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html for additional information. Thanks Title: kdeprefix and monolithic ebuilds issues Author: Theo Chatzimichos Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2009-07-02 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-01 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 17:06:10 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300 > > Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300 > > > > > > Theo Chatzimichos

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-01 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300 > > Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs > > Really? Anyone who has any version of kdelibs ever? Yes, this affects kde3 and kde4 users. -- Theo Ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-01 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
i'm sending it again as it should be Title: kdeprefix and monolithic ebuilds issues Author: Theo Chatzimichos Content-Type: text/plain Posted: Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs The Gentoo KDE Guide has been updated and now covers the two most se

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-office/koffice

2009-07-01 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
# Theo Chatzimichos (1 Jul 2009) # koffice monolithic masked, latest koffice version # 1.6.3_p20090204 provides only split ebuilds, please # refer to the KDE guide for more info # http://kde.gentoo.org/kde4-guide.xml app-office/koffice -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-07-01 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 10:22:19 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > Theo Chatzimichos : > > The Gentoo KDE Guide has been updated and now covers the two most > > serious issues affecting KDE users: > > Make it look something like > > "1.) masking of the

[gentoo-dev] New eselect news item for kdeprefix

2009-06-29 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Hello, I'm sending you the following news item for review: Title: kdeprefix and monolithic ebuilds issues Author: Theo Chatzimichos Content-Type: text/plain Posted: Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs The Gentoo KDE Guide has been updated and now cover

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-06-28 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
wer/hibernate-script - 2 open bugs, rare releases yes, kde team will take kdmtheme -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt Team

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-dicts/kannadic

2009-06-13 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
# Theo Chatzimichos (14 Jun 2009) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Old and dead by upstream. app-dicts/kannadic -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE Team

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-arch/karchiver

2009-06-09 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
# Theo Chatzimichos (09 Jun 2009) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Old and dead by upstream. app-arch/karchiver -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal?

2009-06-04 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
t.eclass >2003-12-11 kde-i18n.eclass >2004-04-16 koffice-i18n.eclass >2005-09-18 jakarta-commons.eclass >2006-02-28 php.eclass >2006-02-28 php-2.eclass > > Do we want to remove any of these? Have I missed other candidates? > > Ulrich -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
in kde-base > (kde-graphics, kde-admin, kde-games, etc) =P > > As for app-admin-eselect, I'd favor tags over increasing the category > levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time > (tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways). > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] QEMU Sick!

2009-01-22 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote: > > > - KDE 4.1 packages updates... or should I say - none of it! Latest > unstable version of KDE 4 is 4.2 version!!! > All the above answers were enough for your other complaints, so let me answer about the KDE issue.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic filing of stable requests

2008-12-14 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
very good idea. It could also be expanded with a "reason" variable for example, in case auto-stable-request is set to false, with values reason=beta or reason=buggy

[gentoo-dev] Re: kde-testing access

2008-10-26 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sunday 26 October 2008 21:04:13 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > i was one of the maintainers of kdesvn-portage overlay and i would like > > if you are able to give me access to kde-testing overlay so as to merge &