list waste a lot of
>>> time and energy since people will *always* reply to them.
>>
>> Replies? On a mailing list? Whatever is the world coming to?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contextomy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:58, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
>>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quote_mining
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
test failed because no
one else has ever run it with test in FEATURES?
Also, I think you seem to be suggesting that gentoo is so well tested
that once something's marked stable, there's no point in testing it.
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 17:39, Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3 package
> managers have implemented.
I'm not sure that's a good idea, only two have implemented EAPI 1 so far.
--
Richar
2008/6/6 Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:48:03 +0100
> "Richard Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
> That's right. When a developer has certain amount of technical
> and /non-trivial/ commits to the tree why should he explain hi
ess.com/2008/06/05/gentoo-council-attendance/
A Council of Successes: An attempt to analyze what the incumbent
council have achieved during their tenure.
http://arbearohen.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/a-council-of-successes/
--
Richard Brown
éí˘^žXŹśČ Ú(˘¸&j)b b˛
-- gotta be worth seeing how badly one can fail to be elected
> ;)
Would you be able to maintain the same level of professionalism you
have shown as both a freenode staffer, and member of devrel/infra if
elected to the council?
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
one can clarify, but don't you need nominations to be open to
nominate people?
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
cess until such time as you are able
to follow your own policy for conflict resolution. I'll be waiting for
a proper bug that I can read that explains what I did to whom, and
when and how they complained.
Regards,
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
ce a
week, you're not worth having?
Also, you said average, did you mean mode, median or mean? Over what
time period?
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[SNIP]
> Ebuild Review
All fixed, thanks.
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
sure as a past
gentoo developer Roy remembers that we don't generally use gentoo-dev
to bug fix poorly written makefiles, we have a bugzilla where people
interested in fixing it can help, or perhaps upstream have a list
where they can discuss it.
Warmest Regards in the New Year,
--
Richard Brown
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
s head in shame, searches for a syntax highlighter written in
cross-platform assembly.
--
Richard Brown
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
lf look
clever on a public mailing list is probably a bad idea. I think
dirtyepic said it best when he said "Let's stop this thread here
please."
--
Richard Brown
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
tter way?
Yes, see:
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html#export-functions
Regards,
--
Richard Brown
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 07/08/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in an ideal world, yes ... in the real world however, i wouldnt trust it
> -mike
You wouldn't trust what, exactly? A dev to install a package they're
bumping? Surely everyone does that before they call echangelog and
decision things.
Proctors: please let me know when my ban expires.
--
Richard Brown
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
2007-05-07 18:41:07 armin76
> www-misc/nsxml2007-05-07 18:41:07 armin76
what did these packages do ?
Sounds like mozilla stuff. Am I correct ?
Their removal was announced in a last rites email, you can find it in
one of the list archives.
R
C is an honest mistake, and not one forced upon
you as the result of some ultimatum, as I inferred from your
conversation with tove.
Your reply has certainly allayed the specific fears I expressed in my
previous email, but it looks like you haven't convinced everyone yet:
http://tsunam.org/2007/03/26/destoying-things-again/.
Regards,
--
Richard Brown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n a mail is
really, but you'll find about 5 minutes either side of that conversation
here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~rbrown/gentoo-council.log
Regards,
--
Richard Brown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:24 +0000, Richard Brown wrote:
>> Why is it a such a problem to be clear? The council is proposing changes
>> that affect us all, giving us two days to discuss it, and then a council
>> member is shouting at someone when he s
rification? After the council has
declared it law, or after he's received his first warning?
Finally, I'm struggling to see the respect in your replies to a
jaervosz, something the new CoC the council are about to order us to
follow suggests is an integral part of acceptable behaviour when
disagreeing with or challenging someone.
Apologies for length,
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to get your input in.
I'm not sure that making that a standard policy would be in the spirit
of GLEP 40.
--
Richard Brown
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ebuilds IMO...
no, we purposefully want this to be tied to an exact ebuild ... nothing in a
profile can get us there
-mike
> | At the profile level, I've added support for package.use
> | which behaves like /etc/portage/package.use that everyone is familiar
> | with.
man portage sa
24 matches
Mail list logo
