El mar, 14-10-2008 a las 18:24 -0700, Alec Warner escribió:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no need to commit straight to stable. Just make two different
new revisions for each EAPI. Then the arch teams can test it like usual.
Aha a
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one presented
could be. Any decent solution for this case?
There are only a few obvious ones, you'll have to
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one
presented could be. Any
Marius Mauch kirjoitti:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one
presented
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch kirjoitti:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
Hi all:
Reading a random discussion in our dev mailling list, I came with a
doubt about our new EAPI policy and its procedures. I couldn't find it
documented nor discussed anywhere so I bringing it here.
Supposing that anyone can currently add an ebuild using EAPI-2 under the
testing branch:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
Hi all:
Reading a random discussion in our dev mailling list, I came with a
doubt about our new EAPI policy and its procedures. I couldn't find it
documented nor discussed anywhere so I bringing it here.
Supposing that anyone can currently
