Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
Aaron Bauman : > > How do you disagree with users keywording that package *not* running the > latest version? > Further, if they are on a stable system running it as keyworded... They know > how to unmask <3 if they want to use the Py2 only version. I don't have any insight on policy and won't venture any opinion, but perhaps I can showcase my user experience: I run -python2_7 and use stable sys-boot/refind -- it was quite the surprise to see a mask and 30-days-to-removal on my boot manager for a (unused) optional dep. thanks, Christian
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On 2020-07-29 16:22, Alexis Ballier wrote: > I think you've been told several times already, but impacting users > with a mask (that can't do anything useful about it) and not bothering > to file bugs for developers (that *can* do something about it) is not > the proper way to achieve anything here. This. Very much this. Especially the part about communicating with other Gentoo developers by last-rite messages. -- MS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On July 29, 2020 10:18:10 AM EDT, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >On 2020-07-29 16:07, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> Package is ~arch exclusively so everyone using it was already >upgraded. >> Masking <3.0.0_rc1 is perfectly fine if you want to keep old while >not >> blocking py2-masks of dependencies. > >While I even disagree with that, this is not even what happened. > >And yes, I probably wouldn't have notice this and wouldn't care if only ><3 were masked. > >But again, that's not what has happened. So, there we have it. You "wouldn't care" if it didn't touch *your* package. Then, you couldn't simply fix it as another has suggested. Typical. You will fight it vice saying, "yea, that was an option I could have taken". How do you disagree with users keywording that package *not* running the latest version? Further, if they are on a stable system running it as keyworded... They know how to unmask <3 if they want to use the Py2 only version. Silliness... -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:03:47 -0400 Aaron Bauman wrote: > Adjust the mask, drop the ebuild, or simply remove the mask. I would > happily apologize for a mistake, but reverting something that is > largely not in error seems silly. > > Again, this is a massive commit, but it should be the last time. Look > at the previous sets of masks... impact vs inconvenience was pretty > low. I think you've been told several times already, but impacting users with a mask (that can't do anything useful about it) and not bothering to file bugs for developers (that *can* do something about it) is not the proper way to achieve anything here. I believe there are a few quiz questions that closely relate to that kind of impact.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2020 16:18:10 CEST Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > But again, that's not what has happened. But that's what you can do. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On 2020-07-29 16:07, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Package is ~arch exclusively so everyone using it was already upgraded. > Masking <3.0.0_rc1 is perfectly fine if you want to keep old while not > blocking py2-masks of dependencies. While I even disagree with that, this is not even what happened. And yes, I probably wouldn't have notice this and wouldn't care if only <3 were masked. But again, that's not what has happened. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2020 15:59:17 CEST Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2020-07-29 15:46, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > Yes, net-nntp/sabnzbd is valid as it still has an ebuild with only > > py2.7. So fix it instead of bitching and being lazy about it. You > > could have done that vice revert the commit. > > Like you can see, it's currently in RC state. No cleanup of previous > stable version will happen before this version was declared stable. Package is ~arch exclusively so everyone using it was already upgraded. Masking <3.0.0_rc1 is perfectly fine if you want to keep old while not blocking py2-masks of dependencies. Regards, Andreas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On July 29, 2020 9:59:17 AM EDT, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >On 2020-07-29 15:46, Aaron Bauman wrote: >> Yes, net-nntp/sabnzbd is valid as it still has an ebuild with only >> py2.7. So fix it instead of bitching and being lazy about it. You >> could have done that vice revert the commit. > >What are you talking about?! > >When upstream released first version supporting Py3, it was added to >repository. So don't call me lazy! > >Like you can see, it's currently in RC state. No cleanup of previous >stable version will happen before this version was declared stable. > >So no, your list was wrong. > > >> I will revert your revert when I return to my laptop. Thanks for >> nothing. > >...and not just because of net-nntp/sabnzbd like this thread has shown. > >I followed Gentoo policy when I reverted a broken commit. > >If can only urge you to revise pkg list and pay more attention for your >next commit. None of it is stable. So, what's your point? The commit is not broken. It just masks a package you care about which has Py2.7. Adjust the mask, drop the ebuild, or simply remove the mask. I would happily apologize for a mistake, but reverting something that is largely not in error seems silly. Again, this is a massive commit, but it should be the last time. Look at the previous sets of masks... impact vs inconvenience was pretty low. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On 2020-07-29 15:46, Aaron Bauman wrote: > Yes, net-nntp/sabnzbd is valid as it still has an ebuild with only > py2.7. So fix it instead of bitching and being lazy about it. You > could have done that vice revert the commit. What are you talking about?! When upstream released first version supporting Py3, it was added to repository. So don't call me lazy! Like you can see, it's currently in RC state. No cleanup of previous stable version will happen before this version was declared stable. So no, your list was wrong. > I will revert your revert when I return to my laptop. Thanks for > nothing. ...and not just because of net-nntp/sabnzbd like this thread has shown. I followed Gentoo policy when I reverted a broken commit. If can only urge you to revise pkg list and pay more attention for your next commit. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On July 29, 2020 9:16:31 AM EDT, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >On 2020-07-29 09:38, Aaron Bauman wrote: >> This is exactly how it went before. No one is saying "it's your >> fault". Fix whatever the issue is and remove it from the list. > >No. You can't drop the bomb and let other fix the damage you created. >That's not how Gentoo is supposed to work. > >C'mon. You even added net-nntp/sabnzbd to that list again which created >a lot of drama beginning of this year. Please don't try to say you >reviewed anything... Yes, net-nntp/sabnzbd is valid as it still has an ebuild with only py2.7. So fix it instead of bitching and being lazy about it. You could have done that vice revert the commit. Surely, I had a mistake or two in the 108 package list, but other devs have already started fixing issues and now have reverted their changes because you want to revert something vice fixing it. The discussions on -dev outlined all of this before. Further, this is the last *big* set for Py2. Of which, most packages will go away. Again, save the few and move on. I will revert your revert when I return to my laptop. Thanks for nothing. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On 2020-07-29 09:38, Aaron Bauman wrote: > This is exactly how it went before. No one is saying "it's your > fault". Fix whatever the issue is and remove it from the list. No. You can't drop the bomb and let other fix the damage you created. That's not how Gentoo is supposed to work. C'mon. You even added net-nntp/sabnzbd to that list again which created a lot of drama beginning of this year. Please don't try to say you reviewed anything... -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
FYI: I reverted the entire commit like this thread and bugs clearly show that this list wasn't even reviewed/checked: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b76ee2f3e20b55d268ec291a1a1328cc047f5a04 -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:09 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > # Aaron Bauman (2020-07-28) > > # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions > > # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc > > # Removal in 30 days > > [...] > > app-office/lyx > > I have unmasked this one again: > > "All python scripts distributed with LyX should now be compatible with > both python 2.x and python 3.x." > https://www.lyx.org/announce/2_3_1.txt Using package.mask in this way creates a TERRIBLE user experience. It causes users to look for alternatives and go through a lot of churn expecting the package to be removed, when it turns out there is nothing wrong and the package doesn't need to be removed. Bugs are a much more appropriate way to handle these situations. To start with, they ensure the maintainer even gets notified at all. A package mask doesn't actually notify the maintainer at all - it notifies anybody who has the package installed, and only when the host it is installed on is updated. It is possible (albeit less likely) that the maintainer might not have it installed, and more likely that they could have it installed in some container that they don't update daily. When the maintainer is able to fix the problem then users don't get the churn of a package mask. Obviously we're going to have packages that can't be migrated or which aren't maintained, and these should be treecleaned as with any other issue. If for some reason bugs are just THAT difficult to create, why not at least post the list on -dev-announce a few days before actually implementing the mask? You obviously have the list of packages if you're masking them, and you're even posting it on the list. So just post it on the list ahead of time so that people can react before they actually get masked. It seems like we're creating a terrible user experience simply because we can. This seems to be going back to how things were 10+ years ago when stuff broke for users often simply because nobody cared to even bother with communication and QA. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:17:04 -0400 Aaron Bauman wrote: > net-irc/quasselgrep Uh, what? [I] net-irc/quasselgrep Installed versions: 0_p20190211(13:18:43 18/07/20)(PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_7 -python3_6") Maybe just the older version? pgpZibCoYPFgd.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
> It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to > using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. Perhaps just the dependency can be removed? Building with gnu-efi still works fine, the TianoCore UDK is just an alternative. s.a. https://sourceforge.net/p/refind/code/ci/master/tree/BUILDING.txt#l67 thanks, Christian
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Aaron Bauman wrote: > # Aaron Bauman (2020-07-28) > # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions > # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc > # Removal in 30 days > [...] > app-office/lyx I have unmasked this one again: "All python scripts distributed with LyX should now be compatible with both python 2.x and python 3.x." https://www.lyx.org/announce/2_3_1.txt signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On July 29, 2020 3:28:50 AM EDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: >On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 03:25 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: >> >> On July 29, 2020 2:49:14 AM EDT, Matt Turner >wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:32 PM Aaron Bauman >wrote: >> > > On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey > >> > wrote: >> > > > That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has >no >> > > > Python >> > > > dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE >flag >> > and >> > > > force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add >> > > > IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman >> > wrote: >> > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > sys-boot/refind >> > > > > > >> > > > > > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at >all? >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was >masked due >> > to >> > > > > using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > Aaron >> > > > > >> > > >> > > That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous >> > discussions surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to >> > remove py2.7 from the tree. >> > >> > You've made a very strong case for filing bugs and asking >maintainers >> > to figure out what to do before masking packages for removal. >> >> Haven't we had this discussion before? Further, hasn't the community >been made aware through multiple channels of the impending removal of >Py2? >> > >Sure, and I don't mind removing packages that clearly don't support py3 >and whose maintainers have done nothing about that. However, I do mind >removing packages that do support py3 and that ended up on the list >probably because some deep indirect dep had some kind of py2 usage >problem (that I had no reason to know about), maybe because it's any-r1 >or had optional USE=python... This is exactly how it went before. No one is saying "it's your fault". Fix whatever the issue is and remove it from the list. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 03:25 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > On July 29, 2020 2:49:14 AM EDT, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:32 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey > > wrote: > > > > That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no > > > > Python > > > > dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag > > and > > > > force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add > > > > IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > sys-boot/refind > > > > > > > > > > > > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due > > to > > > > > using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > > > > > > That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous > > discussions surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to > > remove py2.7 from the tree. > > > > You've made a very strong case for filing bugs and asking maintainers > > to figure out what to do before masking packages for removal. > > Haven't we had this discussion before? Further, hasn't the community been > made aware through multiple channels of the impending removal of Py2? > Sure, and I don't mind removing packages that clearly don't support py3 and whose maintainers have done nothing about that. However, I do mind removing packages that do support py3 and that ended up on the list probably because some deep indirect dep had some kind of py2 usage problem (that I had no reason to know about), maybe because it's any-r1 or had optional USE=python... -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On July 29, 2020 2:49:14 AM EDT, Matt Turner wrote: >On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:32 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: >> On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey >wrote: >> >That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no >> >Python >> >dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag >and >> >force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add >> >IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. >> > >> >On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman >wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman >> >wrote: >> >> > > sys-boot/refind >> >> > >> >> > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due >to >> >> using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> Aaron >> >> >> >> That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous >discussions surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to >remove py2.7 from the tree. > >You've made a very strong case for filing bugs and asking maintainers >to figure out what to do before masking packages for removal. Haven't we had this discussion before? Further, hasn't the community been made aware through multiple channels of the impending removal of Py2? In the end, a few packages get saved and a *lot* go away. Let's just save the few and move on please... -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:32 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey wrote: > >That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no > >Python > >dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag and > >force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add > >IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. > > > >On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman > >wrote: > >> > > sys-boot/refind > >> > > >> > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? > >> > > >> > >> Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to > >> using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Aaron > >> > > That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous discussions > surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to remove py2.7 from the > tree. You've made a very strong case for filing bugs and asking maintainers to figure out what to do before masking packages for removal.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 22:32 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey wrote: > > That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no > > Python > > dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag and > > force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add > > IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman > > wrote: > > > > > sys-boot/refind > > > > > > > > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to > > > using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Aaron > > > > > That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous discussions > surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to remove py2.7 from the > tree. > It is a massive undertaking to figure out which of the deep dependencies made you conclude to list perfectly maintained Python 3-only packages. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey wrote: >That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no >Python >dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag and >force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add >IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. > >On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman >wrote: >> > > sys-boot/refind >> > >> > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? >> > >> >> Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to >> using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Aaron >> That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous discussions surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to remove py2.7 from the tree. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no Python dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag and force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > sys-boot/refind > > > > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? > > > > Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to > using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. > > -- > Cheers, > Aaron >
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > sys-boot/refind > > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? > Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > sys-boot/refind How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all?
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: */*: More Py2 stuff
# Aaron Bauman (2020-07-28) # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc # Removal in 30 days app-accessibility/epos app-admin/conkyforecast app-admin/github-backup-utils app-admin/syslog-summary app-arch/cfv app-arch/ipkg-utils app-backup/bareos app-backup/genbackupdata app-cdr/cdcover app-crypt/openssl-blacklist app-crypt/ssh-multiadd app-misc/mswinurl_launcher app-misc/mtail app-mobilephone/wammu app-office/kexi app-office/lyx app-text/fbless app-text/sgmltools-lite dev-cpp/icnc dev-lang/ispc dev-lang/spark dev-libs/qrosspython dev-python/cddb-py dev-python/flup dev-python/google-apputils dev-python/id3-py dev-python/mox dev-python/pmw dev-python/pyid3lib dev-python/pylzma dev-python/pyode dev-python/pyogg dev-python/pyrex dev-python/python-fchksum dev-python/pythonutils dev-python/pyvorbis dev-python/sphinxtogithub dev-tex/abntex dev-tex/crosstex dev-util/bam dev-util/doxy-coverage dev-util/tailor dev-vcs/cvs2svn dev-vcs/git-bz dev-vcs/gitinspector dev-vcs/gitstats dev-vcs/svnmailer games-action/openclonk games-emulation/fceux games-emulation/m64py games-emulation/mupen64plus games-strategy/0ad media-gfx/alembic media-gfx/cptutils media-gfx/uniconvertor media-libs/ganv media-libs/slv2 media-plugins/vamp-aubio-plugins media-sound/codecgraph media-sound/edna media-sound/exaile media-sound/jack media-sound/moosic media-sound/patchage media-sound/positron net-analyzer/linkchecker net-analyzer/pbgpp net-fs/nfstest net-im/spectrum2 net-irc/quasselgrep net-misc/pssh net-misc/putty net-misc/ris-linux net-nntp/sabnzbd net-print/pkpgcounter net-proxy/hatop net-wireless/gr-baz net-wireless/gr-doa net-wireless/gr-foo net-wireless/gr-ntsc net-wireless/gr-ntsc-rc net-wireless/gr-ppm-wiegand net-wireless/gr-rds net-wireless/gr-rftap net-wireless/gr-specest net-wireless/mousejack net-wireless/rfcat sci-biology/seqan sci-biology/shrimp sci-chemistry/eden sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-caver sci-chemistry/numbat sci-chemistry/pymol sci-chemistry/sparky sci-libs/dealii sci-libs/gmsh sci-misc/gato sys-boot/refind sys-boot/udk sys-cluster/pbs-python sys-fs/rarfs sys-fs/traydevice www-apache/mod_scgi www-apps/scgi www-misc/nx_util x11-libs/flowcanvas x11-misc/dsx x11-misc/pypanel -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: */* More Py2 stuff
# Aaron Bauman (2020-06-29) # More Py2 only stuff. Plz see -dev ML for discussions # Remove bindings, port to Py3, etc # Removal in 30 days app-dicts/opendict app-editors/editra app-office/taskcoach app-backup/holland app-backup/holland-backup-example app-backup/holland-backup-pgdump app-backup/holland-backup-random app-backup/holland-backup-sqlite app-backup/holland-lib-common app-backup/holland-lib-lvm app-cdr/burn-cd app-editors/leo app-emulation/playonlinux app-text/bibus dev-db/SchemaSync dev-python/squaremap dev-util/wxglade media-gfx/fontypython media-gfx/fr0st sci-chemistry/apbs sci-chemistry/autodock sci-chemistry/eden sci-chemistry/p3d sci-chemistry/pdb2pqr sci-chemistry/pdb-tools sci-chemistry/prodecomp sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-caver sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-dssp sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-promol sci-chemistry/relax sci-chemistry/sparky sci-chemistry/vmd www-apps/roundup www-apps/viewvc x11-misc/nts -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature