Alec Warner wrote:
> >> Having nice mailinglist where users can contribute simple patches
> >> would be briliant thing to use :-)
> >
> > That's still a waste of time compared to gerrit. You should look at
> > it if you don't know it already.
>
> I'll take patchwork over gerrit, honestly ;)
Did y
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> Having nice mailinglist where users can contribute simple patches
>> would be briliant thing to use :-)
>
> That's still a waste of time compared to gerrit. You should look at
> it if you don't know it already.
I'll tak
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 10 February 2013 20:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Otherwise, purpose-driven overlays just make sense - they allow a
>> different set of contributors who are more familiar/interested in a
>> set of packages to maintain them.
>
> It makes more
hasufell wrote:
> there should only be two reasons to have ebuilds in a seperate
> overlay: they depend on dropped packages or they are unsupportable
> (e.g. because they are in early alpha stage or broken in some ways).
Keep in mind that there may be lots of other cases which you have not
and can
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Having nice mailinglist where users can contribute simple patches
> would be briliant thing to use :-)
That's still a waste of time compared to gerrit. You should look at
it if you don't know it already.
//Peter
On 10 February 2013 20:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Otherwise, purpose-driven overlays just make sense - they allow a
> different set of contributors who are more familiar/interested in a
> set of packages to maintain them.
It makes more sense to let those people be proxy-maintainers and keep
those
El dom, 10-02-2013 a las 16:05 +0100, hasufell escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/10/2013 12:47 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:> Would anyone be
> > Would anyone be terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly
> > overlay? (And any other overlays that look like they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 12:47 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:> Would anyone be
> Would anyone be terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly
> overlay? (And any other overlays that look like they are fun)
>
Go ahead, I will help you.
On 02/10/2013 12:59 PM, Pa
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> no matter what are Richs opinions he is not the one crating global policies
> for this, so the defaults still are that we encourage adding all stuff to main
> tree where possible.
Relax, and don't make it personal.
The bottom line is that s
Dne Ne 10. února 2013 13:51:16, Alexander Berntsen napsal(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/02/13 12:47, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we
> > remove packages now, remove features from other packages because of
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote:
>
> On 10/02/13 13:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> - just look up your average non-core piece of FOSS software and the
>> first thing their Ubuntu install instructions will tell you to do
>> is to add some repository to your list.
> And the se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/02/13 12:47, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we
> remove packages now, remove features from other packages because of
> that (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay?
>
> Someho
Dne Ne 10. února 2013 19:47:58, Patrick Lauer napsal(a):
> On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013)
> > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
> > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
> > # version in the tree,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> +1. If you can't manage moving/updating your packages properly
> and on-time from the sci overlay, please get rid of it.
Seems like the alternative solution is to just not have these ebuilds
in the main tree.
There is nothing wrong with ha
El dom, 10-02-2013 a las 19:47 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió:
> On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013)
> > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
> > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
> > # version in the
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:47:58 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013)
> > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
> > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
> > # version in the tree
On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013)
> # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
> # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
> # version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659).
> # Removal in a
# Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013)
# Upstream dropped support for linux time ago (#434390),
# possible security issues (#360539). You can use Windows
# version with PlayOnLinux. Removal in a month.
media-gfx/picasa
# Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013)
# Abandoned by upstream, problems building (#362611).
# Remo
18 matches
Mail list logo