# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (10 Feb 2013)
# Upstream dropped support for linux time ago (#434390),
# possible security issues (#360539). You can use Windows
# version with PlayOnLinux. Removal in a month.
media-gfx/picasa
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (10 Feb 2013)
# Abandoned by upstream,
On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (10 Feb 2013)
# Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
# boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
# version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659).
#
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:47:58 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (10 Feb 2013)
# Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
# boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really
El dom, 10-02-2013 a las 19:47 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió:
On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (10 Feb 2013)
# Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
# boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
# version
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
+1. If you can't manage moving/updating your packages properly
and on-time from the sci overlay, please get rid of it.
Seems like the alternative solution is to just not have these ebuilds
in the main tree.
There is
Dne Ne 10. února 2013 19:47:58, Patrick Lauer napsal(a):
On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (10 Feb 2013)
# Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with
# boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old
# version in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/02/13 12:47, Patrick Lauer wrote:
So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we
remove packages now, remove features from other packages because of
that (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay?
Somehow
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen
alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
On 10/02/13 13:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
- just look up your average non-core piece of FOSS software and the
first thing their Ubuntu install instructions will tell you to do
is to add some repository to your list.
Dne Ne 10. února 2013 13:51:16, Alexander Berntsen napsal(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/02/13 12:47, Patrick Lauer wrote:
So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we
remove packages now, remove features from other packages because of
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
no matter what are Richs opinions he is not the one crating global policies
for this, so the defaults still are that we encourage adding all stuff to main
tree where possible.
Relax, and don't make it personal.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 12:47 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: Would anyone be
Would anyone be terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly
overlay? (And any other overlays that look like they are fun)
Go ahead, I will help you.
On 02/10/2013 12:59 PM, Pacho
El dom, 10-02-2013 a las 16:05 +0100, hasufell escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 12:47 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: Would anyone be
Would anyone be terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly
overlay? (And any other overlays that look like they are
On 10 February 2013 20:11, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Otherwise, purpose-driven overlays just make sense - they allow a
different set of contributors who are more familiar/interested in a
set of packages to maintain them.
It makes more sense to let those people be proxy-maintainers
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Having nice mailinglist where users can contribute simple patches
would be briliant thing to use :-)
That's still a waste of time compared to gerrit. You should look at
it if you don't know it already.
//Peter
hasufell wrote:
there should only be two reasons to have ebuilds in a seperate
overlay: they depend on dropped packages or they are unsupportable
(e.g. because they are in early alpha stage or broken in some ways).
Keep in mind that there may be lots of other cases which you have not
and can
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10 February 2013 20:11, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Otherwise, purpose-driven overlays just make sense - they allow a
different set of contributors who are more familiar/interested in a
set of packages to
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Having nice mailinglist where users can contribute simple patches
would be briliant thing to use :-)
That's still a waste of time compared to gerrit. You should look at
it if you don't know it already.
Alec Warner wrote:
Having nice mailinglist where users can contribute simple patches
would be briliant thing to use :-)
That's still a waste of time compared to gerrit. You should look at
it if you don't know it already.
I'll take patchwork over gerrit, honestly ;)
Did you use
18 matches
Mail list logo