On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:32:31 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:42:43 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Let alone qmake, how do you suggest dealing with *-config scripts?
> > > Some packages are just not written with multilib in mind, or have
> > > to maintain historical compat
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:42:43 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > If you consider the argv trick fragile, which is understandable, the
> > same wrapper idea can be used differently: If you want to wrap a
> > binary foo, move it to foo_${abi} and build a wrapper with hardcoded
> > 'foo' instead of argv[0]
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:10:11 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:10 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > We're talking about two different tricks.
> >
> > Busybox checks argv to support symlinking for a standard tool. With
> > invalid argv[0], it still runs as the standard busyb
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:44:16 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >>
> >> I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
> >> abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for abi-specific
> >> behaviour
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:10 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:25:23 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
> > > on argv[0] is a poor idea and means
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:25:23 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
> > on argv[0] is a poor idea and means that any application calling
> > exec() with changed argv[0] on a wrapp
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>> I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
>> abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for abi-specific behaviour.
>> As an example i remember, dev-libs/libIDL has a config binary not
>> m
Davide Pesavento schrieb:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>>> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
>>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
dev-lang/perl abiwrapper
dev-lang/python abiwrapper
dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper
>>>
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:47:23 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> > I am not sure about the target of your qmake question, so as a
> > general answer:
> >
> > qmake is something like configure for qmake based build systems. If
> > you want to
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
> abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for abi-specific behaviour.
> As an example i remember, dev-libs/libIDL has a config binary not
> matching the usual *-config schem
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I am not sure about the target of your qmake question, so as a general
> answer:
>
> qmake is something like configure for qmake based build systems. If you
> want to see the difference between qmake (32bit) and qmake (64bit), run
> a 64b
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>> dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
>>> dev-lang/perl abiwrapper
>>> dev-lang/python abiwrapper
>>> dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper
>>> dev-libs/gobject-introspection abi
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
>> dev-lang/perl abiwrapper
>> dev-lang/python abiwrapper
>> dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper
>> dev-libs/gobject-introspection abiwrapper
>> dev-libs/libIDL abiwrapper
>> dev-scheme/guile abiwra
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> The actual list of packages with wrapped binaries is in the profiles
> dir of the multilib-portage overlay (expect this to be a minimal
> list, there are probably more out there we did not yet catch):
Thanks.
> dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
> d
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
> > > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:21:36 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> you are called with ABI=sth argv[0] = your name
> >
> > I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
> > on argv[0] is a p
Michał Górny schrieb:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
>>> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> What
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > What do we need that wrappe
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
>> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does
it ju
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does
> > > it just rely on custom 'ABI' varia
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:39:42 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> The wrapper is already in a seperate package [1], the currently active
> and tested version (1.0) is in bash, also there is a (currently
> masked) version 2.0 written by binki in C doing the same natively. So
> you even have a choice in wha
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does it
> > just rely on custom 'ABI' variable?
>
> yes -- it must perform some checks though.
What kind of check
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
>>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>> Onc
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> > Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> > > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > >
> > >> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > >>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
>
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >
> >> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> >>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> >>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> Once the eclass has per-ABI heade
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >
> >> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> >>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> >>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> Once the eclass has per-ABI heade
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
>>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
>>>
>>> I think this is needed.
>>>
and binaries support,
>>>
>>> but
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >>
> >> Once the eclass has per-ABI header
> >
> > I think this is needed.
> >
> >> and binaries support,
> >
> > but here, could you enlighten m
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
>> and binaries support,
> but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
> why having multi binaries support would be useful.
One example is glxinfo from the mesa-progs package, it will display the
information for the ABI it is compiled with. So if you
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>> Once the eclass has per-ABI header
>
> I think this is needed.
>
>> and binaries support,
>
> but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
> why having multi binaries support would b
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
> and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support would be useful.
Alexis.
Michał Górny schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary to
> enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for
> specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs.
>
> In this particular context, tetromino has noted that many packages
> don't
32 matches
Mail list logo
