Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-28 Thread Ajai Khattri
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote: Well, sunrise is not about uploading a package just somewhere but about having it reviewed and corrected such that it follows basic guidelines. Since this process requires bi-directional communication, IRC is a good (low-latency) way to do that. Some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-26 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Exactly. =:^) > > I'm really too deliberative a thinker to comfortably keep up with IM/IRC, > and there tend to be problems with either incoming message overload or > (effectively) remote end time-out because they get bored wait

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-26 Thread Duncan
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:37:45 +0200: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> On 16:03 Mon 24 Nov , Homer Parker wrote: >>> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:45 +, Duncan wrote: That in fact is a big reason I never moved on be

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 16:03 Mon 24 Nov , Homer Parker wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:45 +, Duncan wrote: That in fact is a big reason I never moved on becoming a Gentoo/amd64 AT, as well, since when I asked, they were doing most communication thru IRC, and that just doesn't work w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-25 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 16:03 Mon 24 Nov , Homer Parker wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:45 +, Duncan wrote: > > That in fact is a big reason I never moved on becoming a > > Gentoo/amd64 AT, as well, since when I asked, they were doing most > > communication thru IRC, and that just doesn't work well for me.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:31:34 +0100 > Thomas Sachau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1. i dont read it ;-) >> 2. it is around help with every sort of ebuilds, not only those in or >> for sunrise, so would have some "spam" e.g. for me

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:31:34 +0100 Thomas Sachau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. i dont read it ;-) > 2. it is around help with every sort of ebuilds, not only those in or > for sunrise, so would have some "spam" e.g. for me There have been a grand total of 20 messages since we added it to gmane

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Homer Parker
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:45 +, Duncan wrote: > That in fact is a big reason I never > moved on becoming a Gentoo/amd64 AT, as well, since when I asked, > they > were doing most communication thru IRC, and that just doesn't work > well > for me. It's just that it's quicker and easie

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Thomas Sachau
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb: > Thomas Sachau wrote: >> I would like to ask all people, who get to users, who want to >> contribute with ebuilds or similar, >> tell them about our sunrise overlay[1][2]. People can learn how to >> write ebuilds, they can learn how >> to write ebuilds with some nice QA,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Duncan
René 'Necoro' Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:23:32 +0100: > Duncan schrieb: >> Tiziano Müller posted: >> >>> Now, since the sunrise project gets bigger, we might also create a >>> mailinglist to discuss ebuilds for people can't/do no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan schrieb: > Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:56:20 +: > >> Now, since the sunrise project gets bigger, we might also create a >> mailinglist to discuss ebuilds for people

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Duncan
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:56:20 +: > Now, since the sunrise project gets bigger, we might also create a > mailinglist to discuss ebuilds for people can't/do not want to use IRC. > This would also make it possible to CC

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Monday 24 of November 2008 09:21:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> I was told to try sunrise with some of my ebuilds. There's a reason I > >> didn't, and I suspect it's the same other people also don't go to > >> sunrise. There's no good way

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Tiziano Müller wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I was told to try sunrise with some of my ebuilds. There's a reason I didn't, and I suspect it's the same other people also don't go to sunrise. There's no good way of contributing an ebuild. There's no bugzilla or website where I can upload th

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Thomas Sachau wrote: >> I would like to ask all people, who get to users, who want to contribute >> with ebuilds or similar, >> tell them about our sunrise overlay[1][2]. People can learn how to write >> ebuilds, they can learn how >> to write ebuilds with some nice QA

[gentoo-dev] Re: Some support for Sunrise Overlay :-)

2008-11-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Thomas Sachau wrote: I would like to ask all people, who get to users, who want to contribute with ebuilds or similar, tell them about our sunrise overlay[1][2]. People can learn how to write ebuilds, they can learn how to write ebuilds with some nice QA, they learn how to manage a SCM (in this