Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
Git, seems useful, but a bit hard to track ( I really dislike having to
fibble around with long random characterstrings just to check out a
certain version. I can deal, but still)
cogito solves the issue more or less
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere in my archives.
Could whoever's got it, post it?
I'm
On Friday 23 December 2005 22:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:13 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| - Checkout time of a full new tree (no load, and with load)
Do we really care about this? SVN will do really really badly here, but
does it matter?
Depends
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:13, Bret Towe wrote:
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find
the info
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 20:34 +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:13, Bret Towe wrote:
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
to other systems besides
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:33:13 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| - Checkout time of a full new tree (no load, and with load)
Do we really care about this? SVN will do really really badly here, but
does it matter?
| - Concurrency performance (how do multiple simultaneous commits and
|
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere in my archives.
Could whoever's got it, post it?
I'm particularly interested in hearing about CVS, SVN,
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere in my archives.
Could whoever's got it, post it?
* Bret Towe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-21 23:16]:
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere in my archives.
Could whoever's got it, post it?
I'm particularly interested in
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
| to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find
| the info anywhere in my archives.
|
| Could whoever's got it, post it?
The
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:04:19PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over
| to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find
| the
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 11:44 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Hi all,
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere in my archives.
Could whoever's got it, post it?
I'm
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script.
| Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me
| because I had heard it takes days). Doing checkouts caused about the
| same load as cvs, but I have no
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:17:56PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
| http://www.keltia.net/EuroBSDCon/slides.pdf has some performance data on
| mercurial for FreeBSD, roughly the same size as the Gentoo cvs
| repositories.
It's not the size of the repo what matters... it is the workflow. I
don't
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 21:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script.
| Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me
| because I had heard it takes days). Doing
On 19/12/05, Peter Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or maybe not, I dunno. The point being I don't think we should immediately
write off
any of the distributed SCMs without pondering how they might make a
difference or be usable.
It would be very useful for people who aren't devs but
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 19/12/05, Peter Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or maybe not, I dunno. The point being I don't think we should immediately
write off
any of the distributed SCMs without pondering how they might make a
difference or be usable.
It would be very useful for
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:17:56 +0900 Kalin KOZHUHAROV
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| As far as speed is concerned, it is comparable with CVS.
Be more specific please. We're looking for benchmarks showing how well
it performs in terms of speed, bandwidth and memory usage for
19 matches
Mail list logo
