-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> I vote no, because someone has to.
>
> -Alec
>
> PS: Thanks to be keeping the packages in the tree up to date.
So that's only one negative vote :) and others IIRC positive. Time to
fill some infra bug until it's forgotten again?
I vote no, because someone has to.
-Alec
PS: Thanks to be keeping the packages in the tree up to date.
On 6/22/07, Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the council discussed/decided something about mailing lists in
their last meeting, there doesn't seem to be a log/summary out tho
I think the council discussed/decided something about mailing lists in
their last meeting, there doesn't seem to be a log/summary out though.
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
#gentoo-foru
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 20:02 -0700, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:09 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
> > list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
> > great descriptio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> FWIW, I like this idea a lot. A lot of devs would rather just read
> the good stuff happening in -dev and discard the other 85%. I vote
> yes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Seemant
>
+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:09 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
> list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
> great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which
> got me exci
FWIW, I like this idea a lot. A lot of devs would rather just read the
good stuff happening in -dev and discard the other 85%. I vote yes.
Thanks,
Seemant
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which
got me excited about making this happen in Gentoo.
Last
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:37 -0700, Mike Doty wrote:
> Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > Mike Doty wrote:
> >> or you could ask infra to work it's magic making any post to
> >> -dev-announce post to -dev as well and set the replt-to address for
> >> -dev-announce to -dev. that way it's all automagic.
> >
> >
Mike Doty wrote:
> Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > Mike Doty wrote:
> >> or you could ask infra to work it's magic making any post to
> >> -dev-announce post to -dev as well and set the replt-to address for
> >> -dev-announce to -dev. that way it's all automagic.
> >
> > I hope you meant the List-Post head
This sounds promising. One problem I see, however, is that this would
require announcements to get posted to *both* lists and for people to
remember this rule. Posting only to "-dev", of course, makes sense, but
posting only to "-dev-announce" would cause strangeness (as all devs who
want more ma
Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Mike Doty wrote:
>> or you could ask infra to work it's magic making any post to
>> -dev-announce post to -dev as well and set the replt-to address for
>> -dev-announce to -dev. that way it's all automagic.
>
> I hope you meant the List-Post header... unless we would like to h
Mike Doty wrote:
> or you could ask infra to work it's magic making any post to
> -dev-announce post to -dev as well and set the replt-to address for
> -dev-announce to -dev. that way it's all automagic.
I hope you meant the List-Post header... unless we would like to have
another discussion on t
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
> list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
> great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which
> got me excited about making this happen in Gen
Hi all,
I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which
got me excited about making this happen in Gentoo.
Last time the issue came up,
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 17:36 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > Agree, but with the caveat that devs must still be at least subscribed
> > to -core even if they choose not to read it. This way, you could have a
> > -dev-announce that also refers to something private on -co
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
>> again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
>> ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 13:10 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > - Create a new list ("gentoo-core-announce" ?)
> > Reading: dev-only
> > Posting: dev-only, reply-to set to gentoo-core
> > This is the reference list of things (policy, decisions and discussions
> > in progress
On 6/27/06, Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think so. As I understand it, it's not the amount of threads that makes
the noise, it's mainly all the sub-sub-sub-sub-threads.
As long as they're about Gentoo, they're not 'noise' to everyone. I
confess I don't read every email on
On 6/27/06, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(At this point, I'd like to remind you on my distro independent
QM project ...)
Never heard of it, sorry.
*BUT*: it doesn't make any sense just talking about it. Simply do it
or forget it. Only talking is nonsense.
If I was admin @gentoo.o
Lance Albertson wrote:
> I'd rather not create a -core-announce. The amount of times those types
> of things come up on the list are rare. It would be easier to have an
> standard subject heading (maybe ANNOUNCEMENT:) that people can use in
> their filters. If devs start abusing it, then we'll vote
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> But I also think you're over-exaggerating the situation by a long way,
> sorry.
I don't think so. As I understand it, it's not the amount of threads that makes
the noise, it's mainly all the sub-sub-sub-sub-threads.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
* Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
> >again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
> >ratio over the past year or two, and it's diffic
On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff
that's truly required reading.
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Agree, but with the caveat that devs must still be at least subscribed
> to -core even if they choose not to read it. This way, you could have a
> -dev-announce that also refers to something private on -core if need be.
>
>> Now, do we really need it to be -core-announce?
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> - Create a new list ("gentoo-core-announce" ?)
> Reading: dev-only
> Posting: dev-only, reply-to set to gentoo-core
> This is the reference list of things (policy, decisions and discussions
> in progress) all developers must know about.
Agree with -(core|dev)-announce.
>
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 22:38 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > I would be in favor of a gentoo-dev-announce list if it allowed me
> > to unsubscribe from this list.
>
> Sure, if you want to just accept any decisions rather than participate
> in making them. The -dev-announce lis
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 05:54 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:30:31 -0500
> Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >
> > > I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be
> > > posted to a separate, moderated (or restricted posti
Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/06/24 20:06 -0700]:
>> I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to
>> a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list
>> to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters.
Ned Ludd wrote:
> I would be in favor of a gentoo-dev-announce list if it allowed me
> to unsubscribe from this list.
Sure, if you want to just accept any decisions rather than participate
in making them. The -dev-announce list should be for finalized
decisions. It should be too late to dispute
Lance Albertson wrote:
> Outside if this being more centered around dev-only announcements, could
> the current -announce list suffice? I'd hate to need to subscribe to
> yet-another-announcement-list (or make our developers/users). Our
> -announce list certainly has the historical presence where t
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:30:31 -0500
> Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>
>>> I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be
>>> posted to a separate, moderated (or restricted posting)
>>> gentoo-dev-announce list to ensure
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:30:31 -0500
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be
> > posted to a separate, moderated (or restricted posting)
> > gentoo-dev-announce list to ensure that no developers lose tr
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 20:06 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
> again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
> ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff
> that's truly required
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to
> a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list
> to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters.
> Hopefully, this will also help to give more focus to discus
This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff
that's truly required reading.
I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decis
36 matches
Mail list logo
