On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:34, RH wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:06:12PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
A) You have commit access to gentoo-x86, AND
B) you're comfortable with the porting process OR are adept with ebuilds
and would like to help
I'm up for being a volunteer here.
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:38 +0100, Christian Heim wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:34, RH wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:06:12PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
A) You have commit access to gentoo-x86, AND
B) you're comfortable with the porting process OR are adept with ebuilds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able
to write a much better one for
Greetings,I just did an emerge --update world which upgraded vpopmail. This update was bad news. It switched vpopmail over to mysql based auths and storage of email which I didn't have mysql or vpopmail setup for. This gave me a lot of grief. Just and FYI.
-- Darryl Wagoner - WA1GONEvil triumphs
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote:
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able
to write a much better one for
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing
Alec Warner wrote:
Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours.
It would probably be easier if you added the maintainer of each package
to the list (it shouldn't be that difficult, but I'm not volunteering :-P).
/Martin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working on
in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this
stuff in the tree right now. So that has chopped the number of entries by a
fair margin,
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote:
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able
to
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 23:06 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Earlier tonight, I discussed with halcy0n our differing opinions of the
need for modular X to enter ~arch and break trees for some ~arch users.
In my opinion, this is acceptable and beneficial, as ~arch users should
already be those
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 15:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working
on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this
stuff in the tree
I am writing an ebuild for a program written in perl. This program has
the dependency of gnuplot but with the png flag enabled. What is the
gentoo way to enable this USE Flag for gnuplot when I emerge my program.
cheers
rene
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 1/24/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours. Entries in
package.mask should have a corresponding ebuild in the tree somewhere.
I'd like to see the number of entries chopped by a fair margin.
I masked prelude stuff so that it
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:45:40 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was attempting to be helpful and filter out valid packages from the
list. I could have been an ass and been like Yo I think
package.mask is bloated go clean it and not given a list at all, but
that is not very useful.
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 11:27, Rene Zbinden wrote:
I am writing an ebuild for a program written in perl. This program has
the dependency of gnuplot but with the png flag enabled. What is the
gentoo way to enable this USE Flag for gnuplot when I emerge my program.
Rene Zbinden wrote:
I am writing an ebuild for a program written in perl. This program has
the dependency of gnuplot but with the png flag enabled. What is the
gentoo way to enable this USE Flag for gnuplot when I emerge my program.
There is no active way, you could only check if the flag
Hi all.
During the last many months, more than once an idea occured in my mind, so I
decided to share it.
2006-01-25T01:34 kalin $ dd if=/dev/brain of=gentoo-dev bs=1 count=3292
Do you think it will be good to have something like a snapshot of the
installed packages?
Something that will help
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:06:12 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Here's my proposal for dealing with modular X entering ~arch.
What's wrong with the original idea of just making any unported ebuild
pull in
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:12:45 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As I said earlier, we'd like to get rid of the nasty auto-use
feature, including the support for the USE_ORDER variable. Right now
we intend this for 2.0.54 (might not be the final version number)
unless there are
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 17:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working
on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this
stuff in the tree
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:25 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
The problem with that is that it removes all motivation to ever port the
packages. They'll just stay that way forever, where forever means until
I threaten to remove that from the virtual, in which case we'll be in
the same scenario we
2 (already implemented) things you may find useful (unless you know
them already of course):
- adding buildpkg to your FEATURES builds binary packages, which makes
it faster to revert to older versions if the new one cause
problems.
- dispatch-conf does a great job for the configuration
Lares Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did some rough calculations and we are porting about 29 pkgs/day.
At this rate it will take roughly 30 days to have all packages ported to
ModX.
spyderous wants it tomorrow,
HalycOn wants it when all is ported.
I didn't say all of it ported. It seems
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:44:28PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
We should aim for when it will be done in a way that minimizes the
breakage for all of our users. Yes, breakage will happen, but we can wait
until its down to a more reasonable value.
And we probably should announce somewhere that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Here's my proposal for dealing with modular X entering ~arch.
Yes, some packages are going to break. But I intend to keep this to a
minimum on packages people care about, as measured by the existence of
an open porting
Chris White wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2006 10:06, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Here there is a guide on howto switch to the slotted versions of MySQL.
It's a first draft and to be totally usable some repoman commit are needed.
You're probably better of putting this in bugzilla and assigning to
On Saturday 21 January 2006 00:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:10:02AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
that depends, does your code actually have things like
#ifdef DEBUG
debug stuff
#endif
And likewise your code should NOT have some logic like the following in
On Sunday 15 January 2006 19:54, George Shapovalov wrote:
Ok, I got the answer from upstream and, as I expected, 2005 refers to the
language specification and is not a release version. Upstream in fact is
undecided at this point on what naming/versioning scheme it is going to
use, so we need
Mike Doty wrote:
I think before you go forward with something like this you should give a
suitable period of warning, it's going to create a lot of bug work for
all of us.
Have you seen my daily emails for the past week and a half? =)
I have the feeling that it will create the most work for
Mark Loeser wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:06:12 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with the original idea of just making any unported ebuild
pull in all of modular X (minus drivers)? Yes, it means that some
people will pick up unnecessary deps until all packages are
On Tue, 2006-24-01 at 13:32 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mark Loeser wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:06:12 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with the original idea of just making any unported ebuild
pull in all of modular X (minus drivers)? Yes, it means that some
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:32:00 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Loeser wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:06:12 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with the original idea of just making any unported
ebuild pull in all of modular X (minus drivers)? Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
So here's my plan: Before modular X enters ~arch, I will ensure that all
porting bugs blocking #112675 are closed. As new bugs are filed, I will
ensure that they are closed within 2 days, giving their
Mike Frysinger wrote:
- we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds nostrip to
FEATURES
and auto sets CFLAGS to DEBUG_CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to DEBUG_LDFLAGS
- portage will add sane debug defaults to make.globals (DEBUG_CFLAGS=-O -g
and DEBUG_LDFLAGS=)
I'm having a tough time
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Wernfried Haas wrote:
- adding buildpkg to your FEATURES builds binary packages, which makes
it faster to revert to older versions if the new one cause
problems.
You could also use quickpkg, i.e. write a script that interates through
world and runs quickpkg on each
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
I just did an emerge --update world which upgraded vpopmail. This update
was bad news. It switched vpopmail over to mysql based auths and storage of
email which I didn't have mysql or vpopmail setup for. This gave me a lot
of grief. Just and FYI.
I think the time is mature to ask for another step of Gentoo/ALT
improvement ;)
Currently ebuilds uses a sed syntax that's mostly GNU sed 4 compatible, but
incompatible with BSD sed for instance. This is usually fine as we aliases
sed to gsed in our bashrc so that the problem in sed calls is
A. Khattri wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Wernfried Haas wrote:
- adding buildpkg to your FEATURES builds binary packages, which makes
it faster to revert to older versions if the new one cause
problems.
You could also use quickpkg, i.e. write a script that interates through
world and
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 18:14, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
What I'd like to ask is, if possible, to start using gsed instead, that's
present on both GNU and other userlands with current stable version of sed
(4.1.4; ppc-macos has no problem as the 4.0.9 version uses gsed anyway).
if
Alec Warner wrote:
Well IMHO, you can do what you want and if any arch team doesn't like it
they can always pmask it themselves in their arch profile. I will say I
disagree with putting it into ~arch in the current state, although I
agree with the rationale, and it IS your package(s), just as
maillog: 24/01/2006-12:25:01(-0500): Mark Loeser types
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:06:12 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Here's my proposal for dealing with modular X entering ~arch.
What's wrong with the
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Better create the list from /var/db/pkg/* , world file only own the file
explicitly merged, leaving out any dependencies (fex libraries).
Yes you're right - that is what I did last time I played with this.
--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:14:13 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments about this? (Please don't tell me to do a GLEP about this)
We've discussed this several times in the past, and every time the
answer has been that in the ebuild environment `sed` is gnu sed-4. It's
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:06:12PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
A) You have commit access to gentoo-x86, AND
B) you're comfortable with the porting process OR are adept with ebuilds
and would like to help
I'm up for being a volunteer here.
All devs who've
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if you're implying we change all calls from 'sed' to 'gsed' in ebuilds then
the answer is no from my pov
Can you at least read all my mails till the end before replying next time? I
was referring mainly to the ones that calls sed from
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:48, Stephen Bennett wrote:
We've discussed this several times in the past, and every time the
answer has been that in the ebuild environment `sed` is gnu sed-4. It's
the only sane way to do things, since certain other platforms ship
retarded versions of sed.
And
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 19:13, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if you're implying we change all calls from 'sed' to 'gsed' in ebuilds
then the answer is no from my pov
Can you at least read all my mails till the end before
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 19:17, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:48, Stephen Bennett wrote:
We've discussed this several times in the past, and every time the
answer has been that in the ebuild environment `sed` is gnu sed-4. It's
the only sane way to do
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 17:56, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
- we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds nostrip to
FEATURES and auto sets CFLAGS to DEBUG_CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to
DEBUG_LDFLAGS - portage will add sane debug defaults to make.globals
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 01:44, Brian Harring wrote:
Might I suggest this one just get shelved for a while?
everything that gets shelved portage way stays that way for *quite* a while
i would be ok with implementing the back end (i.e. FEATURES=debug-build) but
putting off the front end (i.e.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:33:32 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What's wrong with the original idea of just making any unported
| ebuild pull in all of modular X (minus drivers)? Yes, it means that
| some people will pick up unnecessary deps until all packages are
| ported, but
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:17:23 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| And as there's no current way to fix the invokation of sed from
| within xargs or find, I'm not going to ask to change _all_ the calls
| of sed, but just the ones done through those two or other scripts and
|
maillog: 25/01/2006-00:14:13(+0100): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types
What I'd like to ask is, if possible, to start using gsed instead, that's
present on both GNU and other userlands with current stable version of sed
(4.1.4; ppc-macos has no problem as the 4.0.9 version uses gsed anyway).
Wernfried Haas posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:52:29 +0100:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:44:28PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
We should aim for when it will be done in a way that minimizes the
breakage for all of our users. Yes, breakage will happen, but we can
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:35:07 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if there are archs that would rather not move to modular X, that's
their prerogative. The way I look at it is, sometimes change comes at
a price. I really hope they aren't any archs I use though, because I
take a
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:16, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
maillog: 25/01/2006-00:14:13(+0100): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types
What I'd like to ask is, if possible, to start using gsed instead, that's
present on both GNU and other userlands with current stable version of
sed (4.1.4;
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:00:14 -0700 Joshua Baergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| To be clear here: nothing will be broken. Xorg 7.0 will just not
| provide virtual/x11 (and in fact blocks it), so there will be issues
| with blocks showing up due to the upgrade path. Avoiding the upgrade
| (and
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:00:14 -0700 Joshua Baergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| To be clear here: nothing will be broken. Xorg 7.0 will just not
| provide virtual/x11 (and in fact blocks it), so there will be issues
| with blocks showing up due to the upgrade path.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* There is a clean upgrade solution available that will result in
non-ported packages merely pulling in a load of extra unnecessary
packages (that non-modular users have anyway).
* The clean solution visibly illustrates that a package is unported.
Users who are
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Possible, but we can't prove this one way or the other. Certainly very
few modular X users have encountered apps that are still unported, as
evidenced by very few remaining blockers on #112675. And there are a
fairly large number of
... people using modular X already,
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Please contact me if you'd like to be one of these volunteers. Requirements:
A) You have commit access to gentoo-x86, AND
B) you're comfortable with the porting process OR are adept with ebuilds
and would like to help
I've decided to give it a wait for a few days
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:28:09 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yes, for all 3 people who have a clue what it means when virtual/x11
| gets pulled in. How many users do you seriously think will have a clue
| and think Oh, virtual/x11 is getting pulled in here. I must have a
| package
Mike Frysinger wrote:
note: for those who think they can argue for support of these features to
be kept in Gentoo, you're barking up the wrong tree so dont waste your
time -mike
So, um, when can we expect all hell to break loose? Just a quick check on
my laptop:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 15:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:28:09 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| * The clean solution is the solution originally proposed to this
| list, and the reason we are using new style virtuals.
|
| No, this is wrong. The
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:28:09 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yes, for all 3 people who have a clue what it means when virtual/x11
| gets pulled in. How many users do you seriously think will have a clue
| and think Oh, virtual/x11 is getting pulled in
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Only by modifying every ebuild that has a virtual/x11 dependency. The atom
virtual/x11 cannot be limited to specific versions on its own with old
style virtuals.
Is that so? I guess this must be wrong, then:
/usr/portage/profiles/base/virtuals:# Only have this for
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:08:07 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Uh, given that you can do that with old style virtuals, methinks
| that isn't the case...
|
| Only by modifying every ebuild that has a virtual/x11 dependency. The
| atom virtual/x11 cannot be limited to specific
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 08:06:12PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 01:44, Brian Harring wrote:
Might I suggest this one just get shelved for a while?
everything that gets shelved portage way stays that way for *quite* a while
If people don't give a damn about it,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:16:38 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Where do they define lots? Many packages will legitimately pull in a
| large quantity of libs or apps that are not installed by someone
| emerging xorg-server, e.g.
Heck, add in a non-ported-package fake package hack if
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:16:38 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
| I guarantee you that adding all of modular X to the virtual/x11 will
| make this drag out for years, and THAT is unacceptable to me.
Why must it drag out for years? There's no difference in the speed of
porting
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 16:19, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Only by modifying every ebuild that has a virtual/x11 dependency. The atom
virtual/x11 cannot be limited to specific versions on its own with old
style virtuals.
Is that so? I guess this must be wrong, then:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:08:07 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| The premise for not doing this is that packages will never be fixed,
| right? Why not make the modular X provide virtual/x11 and just
| institute a policy that no new packages can go into stable
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:34:49 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:16:38 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
| | I guarantee you that adding all of modular X to the virtual/x11
| | will make this drag out for years, and THAT is unacceptable to me.
|
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2006 15:55, Simon Stelling wrote:
Lares Moreau wrote:
Many ebuilds fail due to failed QA. How difficult would it be to have
the package create the tarball before the QA tests. If this were
possible, QA could be slightly quicker, as there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
There is dangerous handling of world file updates throughout portage. The
attached patch wraps all world file updates in a write_atomic() function which
is designed to prevent interprocess interference and prevent corruption when an
'out
Yo.
Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
when ran with --cache (bad autotooling), hence the addition of
restrict=confcache
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act exactly the same way emerge does ?
the 'qmerge' step would take care of updating
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act exactly the same way emerge
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:19:22 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg
and world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act exactly the
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:50:31 -0800
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo.
Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
Yo.
Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
when ran
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:08:00 -0800
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:44:44PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:47:11 -0800
Can't follow your thinking here. As said, the code won't corrupt any
data, at worst it will tell the user that it
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:50, Brian Harring wrote:
+os.makedirs(mysettings[CONFCACHE_DIR], mode=0775)
+os.chown(mysettings[CONFCACHE_DIR], portage_uid, -1)
This will die when running as non-root, no? ebuild is now oft used by devs
running as normal users which will be broken by this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
the atomic writing of data in writedict could be gutted out to a
derivative of the file class; via that, same underlying atomic update
code for writedict and wordfile updates...
Hmm, override the constructor and close
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 00:30 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:50, Brian Harring wrote:
+os.makedirs(mysettings[CONFCACHE_DIR], mode=0775)
+os.chown(mysettings[CONFCACHE_DIR], portage_uid, -1)
This will die when running as non-root, no? ebuild is now oft used
87 matches
Mail list logo
