Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What, you really think that Donnie doesn't know how the X licence
handling situation breaks GLEP 23? Just how exactly is ACCEPT_LICENSE
usable when you have this?
[ cropped groups of similar license combinations ]
Pretty usable, when you
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:59 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
In the meantime, please don't remove stuff.
Just to be a pain - you're referring only to treecleaner removals,
right?
--
-o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:27:39PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:05:49 + Steve Long
| Secondly, how difficult would it be for you to do what he asked? I
| know it's not your responsibility, I just want to know whether you
| can do it fairly easily.
It's a couple
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 04:37:44 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:27:39PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:05:49 + Steve Long
| | Secondly, how difficult would it be for you to do what he asked? I
| | know it's not your
net-firewall/ipp2p ebuild is outdated and useless w/ 2.6.17+ kernels
(Bug 141700). It needs a bump to 0.8.2 and some active maintainer,
eradicator apparently doesn't care.
Please, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141700 if you are
interested in maintaining this.
Thanks.
--
Best
On Friday 01 December 2006 08:25, Petteri Räty wrote:
It should give you what the emerge -pv line says. If it says nothing is
enabled then, it should not give you everything. This is because other
USE_EXPANDed stuff works this way.
Err, LINGUAS does not work this way for smaller packages (you
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:55:15 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Friday 01 December 2006 08:25, Petteri Räty wrote:
| It should give you what the emerge -pv line says. If it says
| nothing is enabled then, it should not give you everything. This is
| because other
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen napsal(a):
the maintainer of app-admin/{webmin|usermin} eradicator is not responding to
bugmail and the packages have an open security bug.
In fact, webmin has a bunch of open bugs completely unanswered by the
maintainer for months. If anyone is interested in taking
On Friday 01 December 2006 14:01, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
That's not really a reason not to do it for ALSA_CARDS, since it's so
easy in this particular case...
Uh, no.
Because the cards supported changes from release to release.
Although yes from one side it's easy to provide some more or less
On Thursday 30 November 2006 22:40, Marius Mauch wrote:
Not if you take care of providing the proper defaults in
make.defaults (the sample above should not be the default).
Okay, let's get with a non-complete default, it would probably also help as
you won't need PNP support on x86 and amd64
Steve Long wrote:
There'll always be GLSA's to respond to. That's another issue that
needs to be handled w/ a slow-moving tree. Are you going to restrict
changes in the slow-moving tree only to changes against a GLSA?
That's what we've said.
I don't have a problem with this at all. The
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:43:18PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 04:37:44 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:27:39PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:05:49 + Steve Long
| | Secondly, how difficult would it
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:29:22 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Donnie already stated he'd take a patch, so throw the patch his
| direction if you want things changed.
If you don't want it to be broken, fix it yourself is hardly a viable
QA policy...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail
sys-fs/evms is broken with 2.6.17+ kernels [1], has a couple of other
bugs open, like linking against wrong glib version [2], or ocfs2-tools
issues [3] and unresponsive maintainer.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154924
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147281
[3]
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 07:23 +, Steve Long wrote:
Well count me in as a volunteer to help set this up and maintain an x86
release. I'm a pretty good coder if that helps.
There wouldn't be an x86 release or anything. It would be the whole
thing. All or nothing.
I hear you- it's
Hi,
when does udev load all the modules and does coldplug?
Is it happening before /etc/init.d/modules?
If yes, than i would like to shout: are you crazy?
Well, until udev became stable, /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.? was a
good place, to load modules in a specific order - before coldplug.
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 07:22 -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
There'll always be GLSA's to respond to. That's another issue that
needs to be handled w/ a slow-moving tree. Are you going to restrict
changes in the slow-moving tree only to changes against a GLSA?
That's what
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
aoa aoa-fabric-layout aoa-onyx aoa-soundbus aoa-soundbus-i2s aoa-tas
aoa-toonie powermac
add usb-audio
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:40:33 +0100, Sven Köhler wrote:
Unfortunatly, the order of loading of modules defines the ordner of the
network-interfaces (if you different types of network cards).
You can use udev to name the interfaces, which is far less kludgy than
relying on the order in which
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:40:33 +0100
Sven Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunatly, the order of loading of modules defines the ordner of
the network-interfaces (if you different types of network cards).
This is what udev's interface renaming capability is for. Define names
for your
Unfortunatly, the order of loading of modules defines the ordner of
the network-interfaces (if you different types of network cards).
This is what udev's interface renaming capability is for. Define names
for your interfaces according to their MAC address, for example, and
all is good. It's
On 12/1/06, Sven Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunatly, the order of loading of modules defines the ordner of
the network-interfaces (if you different types of network cards).
This is what udev's interface renaming capability is for. Define names
for your interfaces according to
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:40:33PM +0100, Sven K?hler wrote:
Hi,
when does udev load all the modules and does coldplug?
When it first runs.
Is it happening before /etc/init.d/modules?
Yes.
If yes, than i would like to shout: are you crazy?
Of course, I wouldn't be doing this work if I
061201 Alec Warner wrote:
If you look at
http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/qa.php?q=no-herd-maintainer
you will see a list of packages with NO maintainer and NO herd.
For users, if you see something you use,
you may become a proxy-maintainer for it.
A quick run thro' the pkgs listed
On 12/1/06, Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
061201 Alec Warner wrote:
If you look at
http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/qa.php?q=no-herd-maintainer
you will see a list of packages with NO maintainer and NO herd.
For users, if you see something you use,
you may become a
James Ausmus wrote:
x11-drivers/synaptics
This should be x11-drivers, but somebody misspelled it with a capital X.
Same goes for other stuff in this category and x11-base as well as ttmkfdir.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
James Ausmus wrote:
x11-drivers/synaptics
This should be x11-drivers, but somebody misspelled it with a capital X.
Same goes for other stuff in this category and x11-base as well as
ttmkfdir.
With the exception of xdirectfb. Someone please take that if you want
it.
This thing has been neglected for ages, needs a version bump and has
lots of stale open bugs:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62970
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105272
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124272
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127288
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:48:03AM -0800, James Ausmus wrote:
On 12/1/06, Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
061201 Alec Warner wrote:
If you look at
http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/qa.php?q=no-herd-maintainer
you will see a list of packages with NO maintainer and NO herd.
For
Michael Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:59 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
In the meantime, please don't remove stuff.
Just to be a pain - you're referring only to treecleaner removals,
right?
Of course ;)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 07:22 -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
The only question I have, which Stuart also
mentioned, is whether all security updates go thru the GLSA process.
Are you asking if all security updates that are done to the release will
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Now, we can definitely use help in testing the snapshot. We're going to
be announcing a new round of Release Testers for 2007.0 once we get
ramped up into the release cycle. I am going to be working with the
rest of the Release Engineering team to try to come up with
As others have said, look at using udev to name your network devices in
a persistant manner, it's the best solution.
Yes, i agree. But i have thought about it, and i wonder, if it's going
to work if:
1. udev loads the modules which results in a natural order: saying
eth0 and eth1 are used.
2.
Duncan wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:23:09
+:
Excellent; pkgcore really sounds great- is there any possibility that
it'll become the new portage?
Possibility, yes. It's not certain, as there are multiple
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:29:22 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Donnie already stated he'd take a patch, so throw the patch his
| direction if you want things changed.
If you don't want it to be broken, fix it yourself is hardly a viable
QA policy...
On 12/1/06, Sven Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will udev rename the card eth1 to eth0 and the card eth0 to eth1?
Yes.
For this, I'd recommend running /lib/udev/write_net_rules
all_interfaces and then edit
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules to set the names like you
want.
I'd also
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Sven K?hler wrote:
As others have said, look at using udev to name your network devices in
a persistant manner, it's the best solution.
Yes, i agree. But i have thought about it, and i wonder, if it's going
to work if:
1. udev loads the modules
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
This should be x11-drivers, but somebody misspelled it with a capital
X. Same goes for other stuff in this category and x11-base as well as
ttmkfdir.
With the exception of xdirectfb. Someone please take that if you want
it. (Maybe Josh does?)
Jakub Moc wrote:
net-firewall/ipp2p ebuild is outdated and useless w/ 2.6.17+ kernels
(Bug 141700). It needs a bump to 0.8.2 and some active maintainer,
eradicator apparently doesn't care.
Please, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141700 if you are
interested in maintaining
Hi,
submount is an external kernel module which provides automounting
functionality. It is currently under kernel herd but nobody there has
interest in this package. I have had to fix it repeatedly in order to
compile with newer kernels, it's broken again for 2.6.19 and I've had
enough.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
If the configuration has keywords foo bar, and a package has -foo
bar, mask the package (masked by -bar
42 matches
Mail list logo
