[gentoo-dev] Licenses

2010-03-09 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
I'm trying to add app-admin/supervisor (http://supervisord.org/) to the tree, but its licensing situation kind of sucks. The file talks about 4 different licenses. 1: the Repoze license (which I added to the tree in anticipation of this ebuild) 2: a copy of the regular BSD license, should be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-09 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:17:18 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:13:30 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský hslis...@zoznam.sk wrote: - Minor version bumps (After examination what upstream changed and after confirmation with mantainer, if any.) The stuff you put in

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-voip/wengophone-bin

2010-03-09 Thread volkmar
# Mounir Lamouri volk...@gentoo.org (09 Mar 2010) # net-voip/wengophone-bin has been superseeded by net-im/qutecom # and suffers of QA issues, see bug 251575 # Masked for removal in 30 days net-voip/wengophone-bin

[gentoo-dev] Re: Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:17:18 +0100 as excerpted: I generally don't regard a version bump as a low hanging fruit, as you might end up painfully ignoring the wasps' nest hanging directly beside it. FWIW, that's definitely sig/fortune material! =:^) -- Duncan - List

[gentoo-dev] The feature patch mess in the webalizer ebuild (and how to deal with it)

2010-03-09 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! Intro = The latest version of webalizer is 2.01 while upstream is at 2.21 by now. The reason it's not been bumped in Gentoo is the two use flags geoip and xtended. The former alone pulls in a feature patch called geolizer, while the latter pulls a feature patch called webalizer

[gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer

2010-03-09 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18) is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only. Its upstream Gunnar left Gentoo due to lack of time recently. As I got project admin rights for layman from Gunnar before I know that a similar thing should be

[gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-09 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their maintainers in Gentoo. Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday on the third Saturday of

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-09 Thread Nathan Zachary
On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their maintainers in Gentoo. Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-09 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600 Nathan Zachary nathanzach...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump I assume that quite a few of them would be no

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-09 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/10/10 06:00, Joshua Saddler wrote: I'm prolly not the only one who feels this way, so you really need to pick your bugs carefully! Agreed, yes. Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays. While

Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer

2010-03-09 Thread Patrick Nagel
Hi, On 2010-03-10 11:30, Sebastian Pipping wrote: There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18) is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only. Its upstream Gunnar left Gentoo due to lack of time recently. As I got project admin rights for layman from Gunnar before

Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer

2010-03-09 Thread Benedikt Böhm
Hi! On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18) is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only. The release on sourceforge is not compatible with the current implementation in Gentoo AFAIK.

Re: [gentoo-dev] The feature patch mess in the webalizer ebuild (and how to deal with it)

2010-03-09 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: Solution 1) Add two new packages to the tree:   - app-admin/geolizer (/usr/bin/geolizer)   - app-admin/webalizer-xtended (/usr/bin/webalizer-xtended) 2) Bump webalizer to 2.21 while  - no longer applying