Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:25:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: So I've just had one reservation when using

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-24 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:55:20 -0700 as excerpted: On 04/23/2012 10:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió: On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Corentin Chary
Hello, As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor) I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them. Here is the result of this script on the gentoo-x86 tree: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 1262http://dev.gentoo.org 483 http://oss.tresys.com

[gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Ahoj, log from #gentoo-portage: tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would it make sence to generate local.use.desc in /var/cache, or somewhere in /var, but out of the tree? tampakrap because now cvs sees it as unknown file, which prints out warning in update and collision in commit tampakrap (commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:10:00PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: Hello, As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor) I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them. Here is the result of this script on the gentoo-x86 tree: $ ./mirrors.py

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three days if there are no objections. But I'd like some feedback for the move of the file in /var. Opinions? considering the server generates it and the end user never does,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three days if there are no objections. But I'd like some feedback for the move of the file in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Corentin Chary
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:10:00PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: Hello, As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor) I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three days if there are no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Since .cvsignore is needed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-24 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/23/2012 08:55 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 04/23/2012 10:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió: On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted: Title:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:11:44PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: log from #gentoo-portage: tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would it make sence to generate local.use.desc in /var/cache, or somewhere in /var, but out of the tree? Why are we keeping it? I move that we remove it. It's been

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-24 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/23/2012 10:40 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: Matt Turner schrieb: It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the keywords, you'll see that it's stabilized.) And on those platforms it will

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ??

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Zac Medico
On 04/24/2012 09:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ??

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:45:22 Paul Varner wrote: On 04/24/12 11:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:11:44PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: log from #gentoo-portage: tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would it make sence to generate local.use.desc in /var/cache, or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 15:10 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: And here are some mirrors that can be deduced from that (except freebsd-jp which I found reading the linphone ebuild): xemacs http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/ ftp://ftp.sa.xemacs.org/pub/ I only consider the first site to be a

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding ParaType Free Font License to tree

2012-04-24 Thread Maxim Koltsov
Hi, We had Paratype fonts in tree for some time (media-fonts/paratype) with OFL license. Recently they added bold font variant to PTMono font with their own license [1], but OFL font tarball was left unchanged. We tried to reach upstream with this question, but as for now no answer was got. So the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var

2012-04-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: it's also a bit of a speed issue.  i often want to look at what flags get used across the tree.  what's faster: loading + parsing 15000 xml files, or loading 1 file ? shifting it to metadata/ as a cache of all the xml

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding ParaType Free Font License to tree

2012-04-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Maxim Koltsov wrote: We had Paratype fonts in tree for some time (media-fonts/paratype) with OFL license. Recently they added bold font variant to PTMono font with their own license [1], but OFL font tarball was left unchanged. We tried to reach upstream with this