[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] profiles/desc: descriptions for CPU_FLAGS_PPC use_expand

2019-08-31 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev --- profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) create mode 100644 profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc b/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc new file mode 100644 index 000..abd2434c4f

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] profiles: Add CPU_FLAGS_PPC to USE_EXPAND

2019-08-31 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
hide everywhere, and unhide in top level powerpc profile Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev --- profiles/arch/powerpc/make.defaults | 9 + profiles/base/make.defaults | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 profiles/arch/powerpc/make.defaults

[gentoo-dev] PATCH: add CPU_FLAGS_PPC USE_EXPAND

2019-08-31 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
Possible users from the tree: altivec useflag consumers (many) media libraries (x264, x265, libpng and others.) also firefox-70[1] will have auto-detection of features but we may want to prevent automagic optimizations. cpuid2cpuflags support[2] is ready and and will be merged soon, so user

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apache/mod_pcgi2, www-apps/pcgi

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2019-08-31) # Unmaintained. EAPI 0 ebuilds with multiple QA issues. Last release # added in 2003. Upstream removed all traces of it. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #693186. www-apache/mod_pcgi2 www-apps/pcgi -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a dig

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] profiles/desc: descriptions for CPU_FLAGS_PPC use_expand

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 00:03 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev > --- > profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc > > diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_ppc.desc > b/profiles

[gentoo-dev] Last-rite: app-misc/pip3line

2019-08-31 Thread Joonas Niilola
| # Joonas Niilola(2019-08-31) # No maintainer and no one stepped in to take it after a mailing # list announcement. Has QA issues and continuous CI issues. Removal # in 30 days. # Bugs: #690784, #691376, #693184 app-misc/pip3line |

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] profiles/desc: descriptions for CPU_FLAGS_PPC use_expand

2019-08-31 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On 8/30/19 11:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 00:03 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: >> +altivec - Use the AltiVec instruction set >> +vsx - Use the Vector Scalar Extension instruction set (POWER7 and later) >> +vsx3 - Use the Vector Scalar Extension v.3 instruction set (POWER9 and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] profiles/desc: descriptions for CPU_FLAGS_PPC use_expand

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 00:19 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > On 8/30/19 11:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 00:03 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > > > > +altivec - Use the AltiVec instruction set > > > +vsx - Use the Vector Scalar Extension instruction set (POWER7 and later) > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] profiles/desc: descriptions for CPU_FLAGS_PPC use_expand

2019-08-31 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On 8/30/19 11:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 00:19 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: >> On 8/30/19 11:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 00:03 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: >> +altivec - Use the AltiVec instruction set +vsx - Use the Vector Scalar Extens

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, We still have a lot of packages that are keyworded ~x86/x86 but were never keyworded ~amd64. While I suppose there might be exceptions to that, in most cases it means that simply nobody has been using it for years. Many of them are still at EAPI 0; some were ported to newer EAPIs specific

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 31.08.2019 kell 10:03, kirjutas Michał Górny: > x11-drivers/xf86-video-geode This one is a required driver for Geode LX hardware, which is 32bit. Mart signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Roy Bamford
Hi Michał, On 2019.08.31 09:03, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > We still have a lot of packages that are keyworded ~x86/x86 but were > never keyworded ~amd64. While I suppose there might be exceptions to > that, in most cases it means that simply nobody has been using it for > years. x86, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Nils Freydank
Hi, most of my points were just said. Two additional notes: - dev-embedded/jtag says upstream is dead anyway and it recommends an alternative we have inside our tree, dev-embedded/urjtag. - games-strategy/netpanzer got a rewrite called version 2.something, which looks active/used. Please refl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 8/31/19 4:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I've already cleaned up some false positives (like svgalib). If you > know more, please let me know. > > ... > dev-libs/gnulib This one has only prefix keywords and is maintained by prefix@. It has a recentish EAPI=6 version.

[gentoo-dev] acct-{user,group}/i2p request for 493

2019-08-31 Thread Tharrvik .
Hello, `net-vpn/i2p` currently adds a "i2p" user and group with a random uid/gid; it needs to run a daemon. I'm the proxy-maint for it so I created acct-{user,group}/i2p and assigned 493:493 which are free according to https://api.gentoo.org/uid-gid.txt If that's good for you, the PR waiting vali

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-group/plugdev: Introduce new group (GID 272)

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- acct-group/plugdev/metadata.xml | 8 acct-group/plugdev/plugdev-0.ebuild | 9 + 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/plugdev/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct-group/plugdev/plugdev-0.ebuild diff --git a/acct-gro

Re: [gentoo-dev] acct-{user,group}/i2p request for 493

2019-08-31 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, Tharrvik wrote: > `net-vpn/i2p` currently adds a "i2p" user and group with a random > uid/gid; it needs to run a daemon. I'm the proxy-maint for it so I > created acct-{user,group}/i2p and assigned 493:493 which are free > according to https://api.gentoo.org/uid-gid.txt

Re: [gentoo-dev] acct-{user,group}/i2p request for 493

2019-08-31 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > AFAICS, 484 would be the next free number (when counting down from 499). I just see that i2pd has 470, maybe take the adjacent 471? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny wrote: > sys-fs/hfsplusutils Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This package is almost entirely for use on ppc/ppc64 machines. For whatever reason it has an x86 keyword as well, so the lack of an amd64 keyword doesn't indicat

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 13:14 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > sys-fs/hfsplusutils > > Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This > package is almost entirely for use on ppc/ppc64 machines. For whatever > reason it has an x8

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:03:47 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > dev-games/flinker This builds and starts on amd64 but I'm dubious about whether it would work correctly in practise. I don't imagine anyone will want to use it. Best just let it die. > dev-games/gtkradiant This has been superseded a few

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/5] www-apps/gitea: Use acct-{group,user}/git

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 17:29 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 8/17/19 4:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I realize we'd have to tell people how to rename the account to support > > > upgrades -- but is there some other reason to keep the shared "git" name? > > > > The argument I've been told is