Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
we are removing the problem by default, educating users, and still not removing any data or options for our users and developers. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
of simply RSYNC_EXCLUDEing the ChangeLog by default would be a much better solution. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
wouldn't have a problem with this, and it would still be benificial. The only question left to be answered is how much space would actually be saved to make this extra load on CVS worth it. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
teeth to get things done in a timely manner. We also need enforcement of some sort to ensure projects are active and reporting information on their status. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
fixed so we can have a stable version of 1.11.14 in the tree. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
in asking how to use the application while we're busy trying to get a release out the door. If you want catalyst help or just to discuss catalyst, please join the gentoo-catalyst mailing list. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
you can get your hands on from a bootstrap. Make sure the same works from a 2005.1 (or 2005.1-r1) stage3 to build a stage1 tarball. Those two places are where we hit the majority of our bugs during a release. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 19:57 -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:58:57AM +, Kurt Lieber wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:17:06PM -0500 or thereabouts, Chris Gianelloni wrote: Gentoo is not a distribution of Linux. Gentoo is not anything more than a loosely bound group

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
they want. I'm sorry, but screw that. You guys are more than welcome to go apply at Red Hat or Novell. Hey, I hear SCO is still distributing Linux, too. They'll gladly give you the mission statements and direction that you so desire. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
that might not be the overall direction where we are heading? Dude, pass the pipe. I want some of what you're smoking. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, everything goes as planned. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 14:22 +, Kurt Lieber wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 07:51:39AM -0500 or thereabouts, Chris Gianelloni wrote: This is what I don't get. So what if Gentoo is an amoeba? Does it really matter? Would you rather that we dropped Gentoo/ALT, Hardened, Embedded

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 15:51 +, Kurt Lieber wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 08:07:14AM -0500 or thereabouts, Chris Gianelloni wrote: Sounds like you'd rather take Gentoo back a few years to the days before Hardened/Embedded/Alt. I guess we really should just be Gentoo Linux and ignore

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:42 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: Really, I don't have any vision for Gentoo and I like it that way. Amazing words to come from Gentoo's release manager. We might as well call our releases 'maintenance updates' then if thats the case. Why

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
on this and forgot to send it out. I was planning on posting it also on the Release Engineering page, but need to turn it into GuideXML first. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux Status Report for Release Engineering: Jan 3rd 2006

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
to in our Gentoo blog? I dare you to say something about how Genesi sucks and your Pegasos is a piece of junk... :P -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas

2006-01-06 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. I don't disagree with you entirely, but there's nothing stopping us from *also* producing a Gentoo Enterprise Linux distribution. Like I said, I'll post my proposal, modified to fit the times, of course, as soon as I get a chance (it'll take a while to write back up). -- Chris Gianelloni Release

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas

2006-01-06 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:27 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 02:36 -0700, Duncan wrote: OTOH, it's entirely possible a Gentoo /based/ enterprise distribution may emerge at some point. IMO, however, there's enough conflict with what makes Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas

2006-01-06 Thread Chris Gianelloni
there can't be a frozen tree within the context of Gentoo or as a separate project, of course. Exactly. I'm finishing up my proofreading and spell-checking and should be sending out my little idea within the hour. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas

2006-01-08 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 18:11 -0500, Olivier Crete wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-01 at 09:39 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:05:49AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:00 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote: On 06/01/06, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas

2006-01-08 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, it will not use the package and will compile from source. We use this every day in Release Engineering with catalyst. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects and simple guides

2006-01-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
about herds that are a project? Simply throw in a redirect under the herd name to the project name? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] A New Linux Way

2006-01-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 07:49 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 03:40 +, Mark Stewart wrote: Please contact me if you are interested. I am interested in hearing more. Stupid Reply-To munging... Anyway, I'll let you guys know if there's anything actually worth hearing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:45 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup. We're still using cryptsetup on the InstallCD/LiveCD. Should we switch? What's the differences? -- Chris

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X

2006-01-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
of packages. We are definitely agreeable to getting some help with this, as we don't want to be the cause of holding back modular X in any way. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, wait for 2006.0, or follow the standard steps to switch compilers yourself. It's not like we're forcing you to keep both compilers. ;] -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. I've been doing it for every version of all offending packages, not just the ones in ~arch, since we can't be sure if a user is using a mixed stable/testing system or not. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
to do everything as a group. Oh yeah, I said it. Anyway, I do appreciate any work that you're doing on any games ebuilds. I just hope we don't end up in the exact same situation a (few?) month or so down the line when this stuff goes stable as we are in now. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
of this is that what you are seeing is pretty much expected behavior for bootstrapping using a stage with an older GCC. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. Using stage1 assumes that you know what you are doing. That's not a problem for me. So excuse me that i wanted gentoo-installation to be more simple. It is quite simple. The documentation is quite extensive on installing from a stage3 tarball. How much simpler can you get? ;] -- Chris Gianelloni

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
this release is out the door. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:50 -0600, MIkey wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: You're reading it wrong. The bootstrap USE flag is set during bootstrap, not the build USE flag. This means libstdc++-v3 (or gcc 3.3) is required at the bootstrap level. The reason that libstdc++-v3 My mistake

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. This, by the way, would have avoided the issues that you were having with things like ls being broken. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
talk to you on this). At any rate, I'm not going to bother any more with this thread until I rewrite the scripts to not make bad assumptions. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, that I had no idea that this was what you were describing. I'll get right on a possible solution. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour

2006-01-31 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. That way I don't have to --newuse and recompile a package just to get a simple example logrotate file, things don't get shoved into /etc without consent, and everybody is happy, right? (Yeah right... :P) -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 decision delayed (was: Gentoo Council Meeting Summary (20060209))

2006-02-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
more than the Manifest files are. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/rc.conf

2006-02-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
*only* used by display managers? I know for a fact that it isn't used by startx or anything. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Linux runs on Intel iMac 17

2006-02-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
the necessary changes to get this in before the 2006.0 release. Things need some polish. At the Moment only some things are tested. For the video i use a patched vesafb driver. The kernel 2.6.16-rc3 seems to have some acpi problems on it. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Linux runs on Intel iMac 17

2006-02-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
Yup, I'm a retard. Forgot to post the links. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120340 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120341 -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-gfx/bootsplash-themes-livecd

2006-03-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
mask it on Friday, March 24th pending removal. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: package naming

2006-03-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
a bug is completely counter-productive. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
improve Gentoo. Together. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:41 +, Stuart Herbert wrote: Hi Chris, On 3/23/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If some random developer goes out there and creates his own fork of catalyst in his overlay, I sure don't want to receive a *single* bug on it. Ever. Your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 19:31 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote: On 3/23/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Think about it this way, what if we had two competing products in the tree that do the same thing, with the same file names? We would add a blocker, no? So what mechanism

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sandboxes

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
not break non-overlay ebuilds through its use. With this *single* policy, we manage to reduce the problems that have been brought up in the other threads. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] nss-config nspr-config

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
chance you could make a list of file a bug? I happen to know that nothing that I maintain wouldn't be affected, but can everyone say that? Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
your personal biases out of it. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, but generally - overlays are not a place for bureaucracy... Nor are they a place to allow a free-for-all where people can commit anything that can cause any amount of damage to the tree, while still being official and hosted on Gentoo infrastructure. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
tree packages to break because some ricer told some n00b to use some crazy ebuild from some random overlay that isn't really fit for the general masses. If we take at least *some* measures to prevent this, then I'm OK with it. Allowing a free-for-all in the overlays is not acceptable. -- Chris

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 09:47 -0500, Aron Griffis wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Fri Mar 24 2006, 08:55:30AM EST] As I've said, my only request is a single policy that before an overlay can become publicly readable on overlays.gentoo.org (which is Gentoo infrastructure) that it does

Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal?

2006-03-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
% accurate for getting just the main portage tree. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo theming during bootup

2006-04-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
/background/themes unless you wanted it. Correct. And while we are at it, is there any chance that the bug #124920 could be taken into account while creating new gdm theme? I don't see why not. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo theming during bootup

2006-04-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
-theme.berlios.de/ [2]http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/icons.xml -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSCON booth?

2006-04-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/pr/events/index.xml -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSCON booth?

2006-04-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Wishlist: an automated package upgrade system with fine-tunable sysadmin control

2006-04-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
internal-only version. As I said, this would probably be best conversed with them on the portage-devel list. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Wishlist: an automated package upgrade system with fine-tunable sysadmin control

2006-04-26 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. It was such a good idea that the portage team implemented it quite some time ago. *grin* -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds, Teams and Projects

2006-04-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
do think this, so I'm willing to change *my* definition to match what the in practice definition ends up being, if necessary. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds, Teams and Projects

2006-04-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
files on the back of that. I guess any change to that document should be subject to a vote. I sincerely hope that we do not change that document, which was quite good at pertaining only to what was necessary, into trying to be some form of document to pertain to everything. -- Chris

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds, Teams and Projects

2006-04-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
project page. ;] -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Which license?

2006-04-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
that this license remains intact and unmodified with any distribution which would mean their copyright information, too. Yeah, it sucks, but that's life. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds, Teams and Projects

2006-04-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
discussing this and get back to breaking our new developer box. *grin* -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Having fun with compression

2006-05-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
in the double-digits of MHz. *grin* -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union

2006-05-04 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, not a hindrance. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?

2006-05-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 15:23 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: In practice, I tend to do: =category/package-version* ~arch ~category/package-version ~arch *grin* -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a new media-sound/easytag maintainer

2006-05-07 Thread Chris Gianelloni
either). Easytag 2.0 is just around the corner and will be the first GTK+ 2.x version to go stable (finally!). I use it myself, but haven't ever looked at any of its bugs. I guess I can take it, provided you're going to be available to answer questions on it for a bit. ;] -- Chris Gianelloni

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a new media-sound/easytag maintainer

2006-05-08 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 00:23 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: I use it myself, but haven't ever looked at any of its bugs. I guess I can take it, provided you're going to be available to answer questions on it for a bit. ;] Of course. I know the codebase quite well

[gentoo-dev] OpenAL/freealut in portage

2006-05-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
by one, so a bug report in this case isn't beneficial without patches to resolve the problem. Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Heritage

2006-05-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
easily accessible. Putting it in the images directory on the website makes sense. I have a copy of the font. It is ©2000 Ethan Dunham ‐ Fonthead Design ‐ http://www.fonthead.com -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] GUADEC 2006

2006-05-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 11:59 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: http://guadec.org/GUADEC2006 Anyone going? Anyone staying in the GNOME village? I'll be there, with a friend. Please contact me off-list so I can get some information added about this to the Gentoo Events page. Thanks, -- Chris

Re: [gentoo-dev] Heritage

2006-05-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 09:32 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 00:55 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote: Grant Goodyear wrote: Curtis Napier wrote: [Tue May 09 2006, 09:49:27PM CDT] Larry our wonderful mascot is from a font collection that we DO NOT OWN THE COPYRIGHT TOO. Our

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
be the best approach for this, if it ends up being accepted. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. That being said, I don't put anything there that I don't have *somebody* out there testing, so it's known to work on at least a few systems. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
Projects, respectively. So while there's no rule set in stone that a project exists, it is a generally followed practice. I would say it wouldn't hurt to start a project for ensuring Paludis support in the Portage tree. It would give a bit more credibility to your cause. -- Chris Gianelloni Release

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
it, and quite a few compelling reasons why *not* to do it, mainly support-related. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 01:42 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: paludis/packages: -*=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 -*sys-apps/portage would be best -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
, it would be marked INVALID. (Unless, of course, the bug is caused by Gentoo's patches.) No. It should be marked as UPSTREAM and a bug should be filed in GCC's bug tracker or the authors emailed if there's no tracker. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 12:04 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: - It would be greatly beneficial if paludis would create and use .tbz2 packages, but this is not essential. It *is* essential if paludis were to ever be used for release building. Otherwise, it isn't required. -- Chris Gianelloni

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
in the past. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 16:09 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2006 10:57:55 -0400 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 12:04 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: | - It would be greatly beneficial if paludis would create and | use .tbz2 packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 17:29 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:05:23 -0400 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | We ship .tbz2 files on our GRP release media. | | Until we either: | | a) stop shipping .tbz2 files | | -or- | | b) switch to paludis support only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
no intentions on making it compatible. As I see it, the original question posed to this list is now a non-issue. It will *never* be portage compatible enough, according to the lead developer, to ever be usable as a portage replacement or alternative. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
sure it would be easier to just not use anything in the installer that relies upon VDB when using Paludis. The installer code is flexible enough to make this not to tricky. You mean like *all* of the GRP-handling code? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 21:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:48:04 -0400 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | My recommendation, as Release Engineering Strategic Lead, is that no | profiles be added to the tree, nor any modifications be made to any | current profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
result. Period. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 16:26 +, Thomas Cort wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:48:04 -0400 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also recommend that the package is masked in all Gentoo profiles where a release is built against, since again, it is 100% incompatible and upstream has now

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-19 Thread Chris Gianelloni
to validate the whole tree (or overlay). This idea has been brought up before and shot down. Signing the whole tree does not work, since we allow users to only sync parts of the tree. We do? What option to emerge enables this behaviour? RSYNC_EXCLUDES in make.conf -- Chris Gianelloni Release

Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning

2006-05-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
-vulnerable version stable. I guess a breakdown of which architectures still do not have a version *higher* than the ones listed by the GLSA stable would be necessary instead. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning

2006-05-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 14:06 -0700, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:51:06PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:22 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: And now per arch breakdowns. http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/ No offense

Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning

2006-05-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
was merely making a suggestion on how it could have been better and I guess it came out wrong. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning

2006-05-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:05 -0700, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: I completely understand this. However, in most cases the reason the older packages are still in the tree is because *somebody* doesn't have it stable yet. Strictly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning

2006-05-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
to it. Breaking the tree is a definite no-no. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning

2006-05-29 Thread Chris Gianelloni
as it tends to upset our users. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites - app-editors/gnotepad+

2006-05-31 Thread Chris Gianelloni
I'm about to package.mask this package and plan on removing it in 30 days unless someone steps up to maintain it. It appears to be utterly broken, upstream is dead, and it is unmaintained within Gentoo. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122993 -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering

[gentoo-dev] Marking packages ~amd64 (or amd64) and no-multilib

2006-06-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
. This is like the 10th time in the past few weeks that I've been contacted directly to fix broken masks in other people's packages. It's pretty simple. If it uses ABI=x86 or any emul-linux-x86-* packages, then it needs to be masked. Over and out. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 49 (g2boojum's version)

2006-06-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
they do in detail) I'm sure there's *tons* and *tons* more stuff, but this is a start. We do have quite a bit of this in the ebuild man page, os it isn't like we'd have to start from scratch. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] eutils.class fix for make_desktop_entry

2006-06-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 00:13 +0200, Alfredo Tupone wrote: Going to apply if I get no negative answer in, say, 10 days. Go ahead and do it now. It really shouldn't break anything, as I can't think of a single thing using make_desktop _entry with a space in the executable name. -- Chris

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >