All,
this patch is being committed today.
Thanks,
William
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 5/12/20 6:40 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 5/12/20 8:36 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
>> My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have
>> enabled.
>>
>> Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to
>> remember the update of those ebuilds in the ove
On 5/12/20 8:36 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
>
> My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have
> enabled.
>
> Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to
> remember the update of those ebuilds in the overlays?
>
> This would reduce the bug management tas
Hi William,
On 5/12/20 4:38 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> this change will apply to all users of the eclass.
>
> Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work.
>
> Also, keepin mind that there was a qa warning in place for this issue
> for 3 months, so overlay owners
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8?
Hi Samuel,
this change will apply to all users of the eclass.
Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work.
Also,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:47:23PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> > > > have EGO_VENDOR set
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:58 PM William Hubbs wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
> > > go-module.e
Hi William,
How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8?
Thanks,
Samuel
On 5/10/20 10:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
> go-module.eclass.
>
> This was kept when the EGO_SUM support
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
> >
> > You can't commit this as long a
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
>
> You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree.
Sure, and I'm work
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
> > go-module.eclass.
> >
> > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 M
> This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree.
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, qa, toolchain,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:13:19PM +0200, David Seifert wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs
> > wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR
> > > support from
> > > go-mod
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR
> > support from
> > go-module.eclass.
> >
> > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
> go-module.eclass.
>
> This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa
> warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
>
All,
now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
go-module.eclass.
This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa
warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if th
16 matches
Mail list logo