Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:21:36 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Second solution: github http://cloud.github.com/downloads github-bad-uris -http://github.com/downloads/ -https://github.com/downloads/ The good thing with the first one is that it would allow repoman to outputs something like you should use 'mirror://github'. Well, we could decide on something common and special like: github:bad-uris http://. And then let repoman suggest using mirror with ':bad-uris' stripped. Works for me. What would be the next step to push this ? -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:06:38 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:21:36 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Second solution: github http://cloud.github.com/downloads github-bad-uris -http://github.com/downloads/ -https://github.com/downloads/ The good thing with the first one is that it would allow repoman to outputs something like you should use 'mirror://github'. Well, we could decide on something common and special like: github:bad-uris http://. And then let repoman suggest using mirror with ':bad-uris' stripped. Works for me. What would be the next step to push this ? Next step would be to find a good name :P. I suggest going the Perl way and prepending '~' ;P. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: github http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the list of mirrors). -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: githubhttp://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the list of mirrors). That means repoman will ignore them too. If you want existing versions of repoman to check for those paths in SRC_URI, you can add a line like this to thirdpartymirrors: github-bad-urls http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: github http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the list of mirrors). That means repoman will ignore them too. If you want existing versions of repoman to check for those paths in SRC_URI, you can add a line like this to thirdpartymirrors: github-bad-urls http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Hum, I checked repoman source code, and I didn't find where it checks if SRC_URI matches something in thirdpartymirror. Any hint ? -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On 04/26/2012 01:03 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: githubhttp://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the list of mirrors). That means repoman will ignore them too. If you want existing versions of repoman to check for those paths in SRC_URI, you can add a line like this to thirdpartymirrors: github-bad-urls http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Hum, I checked repoman source code, and I didn't find where it checks if SRC_URI matches something in thirdpartymirror. Any hint ? Search for SRC_URI.mirror in /usr/bin/repoman. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/26/2012 01:03 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/26/2012 12:30 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: github http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the list of mirrors). That means repoman will ignore them too. If you want existing versions of repoman to check for those paths in SRC_URI, you can add a line like this to thirdpartymirrors: github-bad-urls http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Hum, I checked repoman source code, and I didn't find where it checks if SRC_URI matches something in thirdpartymirror. Any hint ? Search for SRC_URI.mirror in /usr/bin/repoman. Arg.. ok, I only looked in pym/repoman/. So two solutions here: First one: github http://cloud.github.com/downloads -http://github.com/downloads/ -https://github.com/downloads/ + a small patch that would allow repoman to do something like settings.thirdpartymirrors(keep_bad_uris=True) in order to keep uris starting with a - in the list. Second solution: github http://cloud.github.com/downloads github-bad-uris -http://github.com/downloads/ -https://github.com/downloads/ The good thing with the first one is that it would allow repoman to outputs something like you should use 'mirror://github'. -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:21:36 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Second solution: github http://cloud.github.com/downloads github-bad-uris -http://github.com/downloads/ -https://github.com/downloads/ The good thing with the first one is that it would allow repoman to outputs something like you should use 'mirror://github'. Well, we could decide on something common and special like: github:bad-uris http://. And then let repoman suggest using mirror with ':bad-uris' stripped. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: github http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ nongnu http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/ (I'm not really sure for nongnu). -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: githubhttp://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
Hello, As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor) I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them. Here is the result of this script on the gentoo-x86 tree: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 1262http://dev.gentoo.org 483 http://oss.tresys.com 482 http://oss.tresys.com/files 482 http://oss.tresys.com/files/refpolicy 473 http://xorg.freedesktop.org 473 http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases 473 http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual 313 http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift 313 http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/patches 309 http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/patches/selinux-base-policy 297 http://pear.php.net 297 http://pear.php.net/get 296 http://hackage.haskell.org/packages 296 http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive 296 http://hackage.haskell.org 209 http://launchpad.net 206 http://ftp.xemacs.org 197 https://github.com 196 http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub 196 http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs 193 http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs/packages 179 http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org 179 http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/src 176 http://github.com 175 http://linuxgazette.net/ftpfiles 175 http://linuxgazette.net 139 http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/app 130 http://pear.horde.org/get 130 http://pear.horde.org 126 http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/driver 115 http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier 112 http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/dist 96 ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub 96 ftp://sources.redhat.com 94 http://savannah.nongnu.org/download 94 http://savannah.nongnu.org 92 http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/lib 88 http://pecl.php.net 88 http://download.gna.org 88 http://pecl.php.net/get 84 http://dev.gentoo.org/~caster/distfiles 84 http://dev.gentoo.org/~caster 80 https://fedorahosted.org 74 http://get.qt.nokia.com 72 http://components.ez.no/get 72 http://components.ez.no 71 http://get.qt.nokia.com/qt 70 http://get.qt.nokia.com/qt/source 67 http://www.phrack.org/archives 67 http://www.phrack.org/archives/tgz And here are some mirrors that can be deduced from that (except freebsd-jp which I found reading the linphone ebuild): freebsd-jp ftp://ports.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp1.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp2.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp3.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp4.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp5.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp6.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp7.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp8.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp9.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp/pub/mirrors/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.allbsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.nagaokaut.ac.jp/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.nara.wide.ad.jp/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ ftp://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/FreeBSD-jp/ pearhttp://pear.php.net/ http://de.pear.php.net/ http://us.pear.php.net/ redhat ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/ ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/sources.redhat.com/ ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/sources.redhat.com/ http://mirrors.kernel.org/sources.redhat.com/ http://sources-redhat.mirrors.airband.net/ ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/gnu/sourceware/ http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/gnu/sourceware/ ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/sources.redhat.com/ http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/sources.redhat.com/ ftp://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/sourceware.org/ http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/sourceware.org/ http://bo.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/sourceware.org/ ftp://bo.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/sourceware.org/ ftp://ftp.mirrorservice.org/sites/sources.redhat.com/pub/ http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/sources.redhat.com/pub/ xemacs http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/ ftp://ftp.sa.xemacs.org/pub/ xorghttp://xorg.freedesktop.org/pub/ http://ftp.x.org/pub/ That would affect ~1000 URIs. Unfortunatly I didn't found any mirror for: - pecl.php.net - hackage.haskell.org - get.qt.nokia.com - launchpad But maybe we should still add them to thirdpartymirrors ? Look at 3dgamers, beyondunreal, bitbucket, github, gnome, kernel, xfce, vdrfiles and vdr-developerorg: they all only have one mirror ! For those afraid to add these mirrors and patch all affected ebuilds: no worry, mirrors.py can do it for you, and I already generated splitted patches generated from various thirdpartymirrors here: http://xf.iksaif.net/dev/gentoo/ Note that as part of https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405533 mgorny already commited a massive amount of patches adding mirror:// when the URI prefix was already present in thirdpartymirrors. Thanks, -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net/ pgp2V9f9HGBZb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:10:00PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: Hello, As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor) I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them. Here is the result of this script on the gentoo-x86 tree: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 http://pear.php.net 297 http://pear.php.net/get 88 http://pecl.php.net 88 http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:10:00PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: Hello, As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor) I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them. Here is the result of this script on the gentoo-x86 tree: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 http://pear.php.net 297 http://pear.php.net/get 88 http://pecl.php.net 88 http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On 04/24/2012 09:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 + Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: $ ./mirrors.py --all --count 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. And since there is already ~10 mirrors with only one actual backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. We could just add them in thirpartymirrors under fake names that nobody will use. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 15:10 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: And here are some mirrors that can be deduced from that (except freebsd-jp which I found reading the linphone ebuild): xemacs http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/ ftp://ftp.sa.xemacs.org/pub/ I only consider the first site to be a reliable source for the packages, and this is what the eclass provides (only 4 packages actually provide a SRC_URI, all others are handled through the eclass). Kind regards, Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
