Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-09 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:17:18 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:13:30 +0100 > Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > > - Minor version bumps (After examination what upstream changed and > > after confirmation with mantainer, if any.) > > The stuff you put in brackets is exactly the sor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:13:30 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > - Minor version bumps (After examination what upstream changed and > after confirmation with mantainer, if any.) The stuff you put in brackets is exactly the sort of stuff that tends to make version bumps hard to fix. You would firs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 08 March 2010 05:06:40 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo > bugs: work with the bugday guys to get this incorporated into their documentation > SRC_URI errors > Missing depencies > ... > > What else? incorrect LICE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/08/10 14:13, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:40 +0100 > Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among >> Gentoo bugs: >> >> SRC_URI errors >> Missing depencies > > (Sorry for answering a developer targeted question w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/08/10 14:27, Markos Chandras wrote: > Documentation installation > There are few packages that call missing documents on dodoc commands any idea how to find all these bugs? sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/08/10 18:08, Mark Loeser wrote: > What is this even in reference to? Its not at all clear what you are > trying to do. Okay, sorry. I was wondering what classes of bugs there are that are - reoccuring (therefore beloning to a "class" or "pattern") - relatively easy to fix - ideally s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Mark Loeser
Sebastian Pipping said: > Hello! > > > There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo > bugs: > > SRC_URI errors > Missing depencies > ... > > What else? > > Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't "take days" to get it fixed? What is this even in refe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On Seg, 2010-03-08 at 11:06 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Hello! > > > There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo > bugs: > > SRC_URI errors > Missing depencies > ... > > What else? > > Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't "take days" to get i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Markos Chandras
On Monday 08 March 2010 12:06:40 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Hello! > > > There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo > bugs: > > SRC_URI errors > Missing depencies > ... > > What else? > > Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't "take days" to get it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:40 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among > Gentoo bugs: > > SRC_URI errors > Missing depencies (Sorry for answering a developer targeted question while I'm not one.) - Minor version bumps (After examinat

[gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo bugs: SRC_URI errors Missing depencies ... What else? Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't "take days" to get it fixed? Sebastian