Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-10 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Friday 10 October 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:32:44 +0300 > > Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Of those, and those in overlays, and those that are going to be > > > committed over the next few weeks, how many use src_prepare to > > > apply security related

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:32:44 +0300 Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of those, and those in overlays, and those that are going to be > > committed over the next few weeks, how many use src_prepare to apply > > security related patches? > > A round zero. Security patches are going stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:22:19 -0700 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So where exactly is this "sky is falling" issue you're worried >> about? Bugs happen. > > It means anyone using EAPI 2 now is going to encount

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 00:55 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:38:56 -0700 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of that 308, number of ebuilds that either inherit java-utils (which > > adds src_prepare), define their own src_prepare, or even *match* > > default via gr

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:38:56 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of that 308, number of ebuilds that either inherit java-utils (which > adds src_prepare), define their own src_prepare, or even *match* > default via grepping in the ebuild is 20. Of those, and those in overlays, and th

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:34:59PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:22:19 -0700 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So where exactly is this "sky is falling" issue you're worried > > about? Bugs happen. > > It means anyone using EAPI 2 now is going to encounter seve

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:22:19 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So where exactly is this "sky is falling" issue you're worried > about? Bugs happen. It means anyone using EAPI 2 now is going to encounter severe breakages with Pkgcore. Simply put, all your Pkgcore users are going to ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:53:13PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:47:36 -0400 > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Unfortunately Portage and Pkgcore have broken EAPI 2 > > > implementations. > > > > > > Ciaran, I would think at this

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Unfortunately Portage and Pkgcore have broken EAPI 2 implementations. > So far as I can see: > > Portage: > > * doesn't implement the 'default' function correctly for src_prepare. This is fixed and released in sys-apps/porta

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:47:36 -0400 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Unfortunately Portage and Pkgcore have broken EAPI 2 > > implementations. > > > Ciaran, I would think at this point you know this since you've seen > this brought up hundreds of times on thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-09 Thread Doug Goldstein
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Unfortunately Portage and Pkgcore have broken EAPI 2 implementations. > Ciaran, I would think at this point you know this since you've seen this brought up hundreds of times on this list. The mailing list is not an appropriate place to file bug reports. The proper plac