On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:42:43 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you consider the argv trick fragile, which is understandable, the
same wrapper idea can be used differently: If you want to wrap a
binary foo, move it to foo_${abi} and build a wrapper with hardcoded
'foo' instead
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:32:31 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:42:43 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Let alone qmake, how do you suggest dealing with *-config scripts?
Some packages are just not written with multilib in mind, or have
to
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:10:11 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:10 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
We're talking about two different tricks.
Busybox checks argv to support symlinking for a standard tool. With
invalid argv[0], it still
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:10 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:25:23 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:44:16 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for abi-specific behaviour.
As an example i remember, dev-libs/libIDL has a config binary not
matching the usual
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:47:23 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am not sure about the target of your qmake question, so as a
general answer:
qmake is something like configure for qmake based build
Davide Pesavento schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
dev-lang/perl abiwrapper
dev-lang/python abiwrapper
dev-lang/ruby
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some
abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for abi-specific behaviour.
As an example i remember, dev-libs/libIDL has a config binary
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:25:23 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
on argv[0] is a poor idea and means that any application calling
exec()
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
The actual list of packages with wrapped binaries is in the profiles
dir of the multilib-portage overlay (expect this to be a minimal
list, there are probably more out there we did not yet catch):
Thanks.
dev-db/mysql
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
dev-lang/perl abiwrapper
dev-lang/python abiwrapper
dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper
dev-libs/gobject-introspection abiwrapper
dev-libs/libIDL abiwrapper
dev-scheme/guile
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
dev-db/mysql abiwrapper
dev-lang/perl abiwrapper
dev-lang/python abiwrapper
dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am not sure about the target of your qmake question, so as a general
answer:
qmake is something like configure for qmake based build systems. If you
want to see the difference between qmake (32bit) and qmake (64bit),
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:39:42 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
The wrapper is already in a seperate package [1], the currently active
and tested version (1.0) is in bash, also there is a (currently
masked) version 2.0 written by binki in C doing the same natively. So
you even have a
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do?
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we need that wrapper for? What does
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:21:36 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
you are called with ABI=sth argv[0] = your name
I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support would be useful.
Alexis.
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support would be useful.
One example is glxinfo from the mesa-progs package, it will display the
information for the ABI it is compiled with. So if you
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but here, could you
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does it
just rely on custom 'ABI' variable?
yes -- it must perform some checks
30 matches
Mail list logo
