On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
calling, which changes the mood of the mailing list and causes issues
for more people than just your
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
calling, which changes
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400
Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
calling, which
On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400
Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you
On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:57:42 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400 Jacob Godserv wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:57:42 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400 Jacob Godserv wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:49 -0700
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
because he's a stupid nub
-mike
NO U
Is that pronounced 'nub' or 'noob' ?
Man I should really go to SCALE next year :X
We got the
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:27:50 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
What about newnet. Should we keep it at all? If we do, should we put
it behind a use flag which would be off by default?
I insist on keeping it as I use it myself. The new approach seems more
desktop-targeted to me.
Hi!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Michał Górny wrote:
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
What about newnet. Should we keep it at all? If we do, should we put
it behind a use flag which would be off by default?
I insist on keeping it as I use it myself. The new approach seems more
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Michał Górny wrote:
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
What about newnet. Should we keep it at all? If we do, should we put
it behind a use flag which would be off by default?
I
On 09/20/2010 11:10 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
the same is true for everyone who already runs newnet (like me). in
fact, i do not even use the newnet conf.d stuff, but rather take
advantage of support for /etc/ifup.eth* in /etc/init.d/network. that
way i can configure the networking with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2010 09:22 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:05:46AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:57 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I suppose one question I need to ask is the oldnet vs newnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:46:21 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why can't we keep both? There are strong advantages/disadvantages
either way and there are users invested in both new/oldnet. I know
this is more work on doc
On 09/20/2010 07:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
I guess quite a good solution for now might be enabling newnet through
an USE flag, being masked in the profile by default. That would satisfy
the oldnet compatibility requirement for users, while the small group
preferring newnet could still benefit
On 20.09.2010 16:37, Richard Freeman wrote:
One argument I've heard against newnet is that you can't bring
individual interfaces up and down.
openrc[newnet] used to have problems with ppp interfaces. I do not know
if it is still the case but there are some open bugs on bugzilla.g.o
regarding
On Sunday, September 19, 2010 20:27:50 William Hubbs wrote:
I suppose one question I need to ask is the oldnet vs newnet question.
The git repository defaults to building and installing the newnet
option, and we make oldnet the default in the ebuild.
People migrating from stable will know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:46:21 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why can't we keep both? There are strong advantages/disadvantages
either way and there are users invested in both new/oldnet. I know
this is more work on doc
On Monday, September 20, 2010 13:49:08 Joshua Saddler wrote:
Wrong. It will. The GDP--that's effectively just me--will already have to
rewrite every single one of hundreds of pages of documentation to allow
for the new syntax and way of doing things present in the oldnet
behavior of OpenRC.
Hi!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
who runs servers: DHCP is uncommon there, WLAN is very unusual,
as a result, they would not only have to switch the way they
configure their nets (people don't like that kind of
Tobias Klausmann dixit (2010-09-20, 20:34):
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
who runs servers: DHCP is uncommon there, WLAN is very unusual,
as a result, they would not only have to switch the way they
Eray Aslan wrote:
On 20.09.2010 16:37, Richard Freeman wrote:
One argument I've heard against newnet is that you can't bring
individual interfaces up and down.
openrc[newnet] used to have problems with ppp interfaces. I do not know
if it is still the case but there are some open
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:57 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I suppose one question I need to ask is the oldnet vs newnet question.
The git repository defaults to building and installing the newnet
option, and we make oldnet the default in the ebuild.
People migrating from stable
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:05:46AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:57 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I suppose one question I need to ask is the oldnet vs newnet question.
The git repository defaults to building and installing the newnet
option, and we
On Sunday, September 19, 2010 21:22:06 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:05:46AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
I suppose one question I need to ask is the oldnet vs newnet question.
The git repository defaults to
24 matches
Mail list logo
