Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013, 12:00:57 schrieb William Hubbs:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
naming of the package, and
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:00:57PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
So, my choices, in no particular order, would be, netifrc, networkrc or,
if neither of those fly, keep gentoo-oldnet.
Robin hasn't responded, so my choice for this is netifrc (network
interface rc). Someone made a comment about
Dnia 2013-08-07, o godz. 12:00:57
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:01:14AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Well, it sounds totally like motif to me but that doesn't really
matter :D. Though I'd cut it down to 'netif' unless that's taken.
Without the 'rc' is more nicely pronounced.
netif is taken unfortunately, it's hard to differentiate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/06/2013 12:09 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Various proposed names (in no specific order):
names, *sigh*
It's rather a interface setup utility than a networking thing.
Networkin happens - most cases - when you have paths and entities and
such
On 06/08/2013 00:09, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a wider net for
naming ideas.
I'm most certainly not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/13 09:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 08/05/2013 06:09 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
- netrc (conflicts)
Would naming it net-rc alleviate the perceived conflict?
Or alternatively, rc-net ?
(google seems to reference 'rc' as 'remote
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a wider net for
naming ideas.
Robin,
Am Dienstag, 6. August 2013, 11:26:16 schrieb William Hubbs:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
naming of the package, and I
[snip]
:p I'm actually thinking netrc if Robin is ok with it. William
replaying to a random message in the tree
Not going to suggest a name but if has to be something for general
consumption, it should avoid the gentoo inside the name
just my 0.2¢
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single
person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the
naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a wider net for
naming ideas.
I'm most certainly not planning to get rid of the package whatsoever,
many
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:09:54 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Naming goals:
- Should describe what it does
- Does NOT have a name conflict as verified by Google.
- Does NOT imply OpenRC.
- Implying Gentoo is fine, as it's where the package comes from.
- Should drop 'old'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/06/2013 12:09 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a
single person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas
for the naming of the package, and I think people need to cast a
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote
Naming goals:
- Should describe what it does
- Does NOT have a name conflict as verified by Google.
- Does NOT imply OpenRC.
- Implying Gentoo is fine, as it's where the package comes from.
- Should drop 'old'
Some
On 08/05/2013 06:09 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
- netrc (conflicts)
Would naming it net-rc alleviate the perceived conflict?
On 08/05/2013 09:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 08/05/2013 06:09 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
- netrc (conflicts)
Would naming it net-rc alleviate the perceived conflict?
Or, duh, networkrc.
On 4 August 2013 10:38, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM,
Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM
Dnia 2013-08-04, o godz. 15:37:50
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if
the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during
previous
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:37 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2013 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
I thought about gentoo-networking, but that sucks in a way too
because it implies that everyone on gentoo should be using it.
...
How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dnia 2013-08-04, o godz. 18:01:40
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2013 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
I thought about gentoo-networking, but that sucks in a way too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2013 06:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Since it was pulled out of openrc, the name netrc also suggests
itself.
'net run control'?
Sounds about right. We can say it's net run configuration if that's
better politically.
-BEGIN PGP
Am Sonntag, 4. August 2013, 22:37:50 schrieb William Hubbs:
(...)
Dear William,
I think we have come to the point where we all realize that
* any other name is better than oldnet
* there are several possible new names
* and (as frequently) decision by discussion does not really work.
(This is
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm splitting the thread because this is a separate subject.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:59:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
I do understand why Roy refer this as oldnet... but why in Gentoo do
we keep the term
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init
systems. Right now it is very tightly integrated with OpenRc, but there
is interest
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init
systems.
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
OK... so
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually the plan
32 matches
Mail list logo
