[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Duncan
Alec Warner posted b41005390905312058p314e6e1bnda50488d56ba0...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May 2009 20:58:27 -0700: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) > wrote: >> >> I think [trialware install] is an interesting use-case. It would be >> very simple to ha

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Duncan wrote: >> Patrick Börjesson posted >> 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 >> 22:17:41 +0200: >> >>> Why exactly would you want to use

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Duncan
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" posted 4a22682a.1050...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May 2009 13:21:14 +0200: > Duncan wrote: >> For leaf packages [-1] serves as a sort of test install. >> Experimental installs and their deps typically sit in the >> --depclean list for anything from a few

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > Patrick Börjesson posted > 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 > 22:17:41 +0200: > >> Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a "leaf package" that is >> not depended on by any other packa