Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-14 Thread Patrick Börjesson
On 05/11/14 09:53, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:38:28PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote: > > > >   filenames. > OT, but return of the funky 'A's... > Curious if others are seeing it, or if my nano/mutt setup just plain > su

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-14 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:38:28PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote: > > > ?? filenames. OT, but return of the funky 'A's... Curious if others are seeing it, or if my nano/mutt setup just plain sucks. > > > * portage.py edits to the config class t

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-14 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 14 November 2005 23:17, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:38:28 +0900 > > Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The cache and elog plugin selection(s) come from user settings but > > emaint (and repoman whenever that happens (and possibly even emerge > > itself one day?))

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-14 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:38:28 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The cache and elog plugin selection(s) come from user settings but > emaint (and repoman whenever that happens (and possibly even emerge > itself one day?)) needs to automatically detect what's available and > use it. Th

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-14 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:33:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > I've had a go at creating a generic plugin framework for portage. The > > attached patch contains: > > > > * plugins/__init__.py that does plugin searching and loading. > > * p

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-13 Thread Jason Stubbs
I'll answer the other parts later as I'm too tired now... On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote: > Offhand... what's the non-cache intention of this? I'm not seeing the > gain for stable aside from a more complex handling of cache plugins, > and allowing for python to lose it's ma

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-12 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:33:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > I've had a go at creating a generic plugin framework for portage. The > attached > patch contains: > > * plugins/__init__.py that does plugin searching and loading. > * plugins/cache/__init__.py which specifies what class cache plug

[gentoo-portage-dev] Plugin framework

2005-11-12 Thread Jason Stubbs
I've had a go at creating a generic plugin framework for portage. The attached patch contains: * plugins/__init__.py that does plugin searching and loading. * plugins/cache/__init__.py which specifies what class cache plugins must   derive from. * cache/{anydbm,flat_hash,flat_list,metadata,sqlite