Hi!
> At this point, I'd almost trust NPTL more. After following this thread,
> it seems you have the knowhow and motivation to fix buggy LT apps for
> NPTL if they break.
Fixing "buggy" LT apps should be relatively easy, if they are buggy due to
the current limitations of LT. If they are buggy o
> > I started with 2.6.0 mm (SMP + Preempt seems to work fine so far ;-).
> > Do you think that's OK?
> >
>
> Seems ok this side - that is if you are talking about the combination
> of smp and preempt.
I meant wrt NPTL...
Loic.
--
COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
---
> I do not know if I am just lucky, but late 2.5's and now 2.6's runs fine
> for me (ok, so I usually only use -bk's, and I keep an eye on LKML for
> patches ... ).
I started with 2.6.0 mm (SMP + Preempt seems to work fine so far ;-).
Do you think that's OK?
> I have been using nptl since nov/d
> nptl 0.55 is in a KEYWORDS="-*" masked version of glibc
According to the GF5 FAQ on the gentoo forum, "-arch" means:
doesn't work for architecture arch. Does "-*" means:
"doesn't work for ANY architecture"?
> it needs kernel 2.5* (preferrably 2.6 to build)
>
> 2.6 is testing, bloody edge and
Hi!
> Can someone describe in a few sentences why it is so "dangerous" to
> install a newer version of glibc.
In a few words. Everything in your system depends on glibc. Normally,
one should emerge world if glibc is updated.
IOW, it means that all utilities/programs use glibc (the DL version)
> > Did you ever try to get a stable system running on a buggy
> > Hardware? That's a really funny...
> So funny I split some knuckle skin on the stupid machine!
I see...
> > In one of my system, I have two set of glibcs: the official, and
> > my "customized version". I use a symlink to swit
Hi!
> The docs section of gentoo.org is huge. Portage docs are there too.
I was probably getting tired yesterday in searching accross the web..
I missed the "Portage Manual" (I read the Portage User Guide, though).
Your mail invited me to look at the gentoo.org more closely.
Thanks!
> > A s
Hallo Ulrich!
> > Ok, I'm a newbie in Gentoo. Right. I don't know how work the
> > ebuild process, and AFAIK there is no document explaining how it
> > works in all extend. That's what I'm missing.
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/portage-user.xml
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/portage-manual.
Hi Collins!
> Quick answer. If you emerge , portage finds the
> appropriate version and all dependancies. If you emerge package-name>, you are responsible for finding any dependancies that
> can't be met automatically and resolving them yourself. If looks like
> the package you are trying to
Hi!
Thanks for your reply!
> > Look, you DON'T want to play with NPTL if you are still struggling to
> > meet dependencies.
> >
> > The ebuild gave you enough info for you to go off on your own and
> > satisfy what it was asking for by manually unmasking some stuff,
> > slotting it appropriat
Hi!
> > The next point I'm eager to try is NPTL. I would like to have the
> > latest
> > version available, namely 0.55 (the v0.28 available with glibc-2.3.2-r1
> > is too buggy for me). For this, I need to install glibc-2.3.2-r3.
> >
> > How should I proceed? From my understanding, a simple eme
> > A thing that I'm really missing is the gentoo counterpart to the
> > "FreeBSD Handbook". Or... Did I missed it? ISTM that one has to search
> > accross the web to be able to use gentoo. First, it's extremly time
> > consuming. And second, that's not acceptable for business purpose
> > (alt
Hello!
I heard many good feedbacks about gentoo. So I decided to try it. So
far, everything worked. As a newbie, I first chose to install the
gentoo-sources. It was a quite easy task. Proud of my success, I
decided to give a try with the mm-sources.
Ok, that what not so easy as for the former
13 matches
Mail list logo