On Monday 01 April 2013 20:51:45 Michael Mol wrote:
--->8
> So, there are three conceivable configurations (initramfs
> notwithstanding):
What a fine word! It's a while since I saw it last.
> 1. With systems which don't require /usr binaries before /usr would be
> mounted, separate /usr is not
Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
> solid stuff?
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
>
>
well, it was bad for spamhaus
Michael Mol wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>>> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
>>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>>
>>> Since it's obviou
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> > On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> >> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> >>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> > Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
Am 01.04.2013 18:59, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Michael Mair-Keimberger
> wrote:
>> Look at bug 463550 [1]..
>>
>>
>>
>> Either you downgrade to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.7.1-r2 or use
>> the patch which is pointed out at the bug.
>>
>>
>>
>> mike
>>
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Michael Mair-Keimberger
wrote:
> Look at bug 463550 [1]..
>
>
>
> Either you downgrade to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.7.1-r2 or use
> the patch which is pointed out at the bug.
>
>
>
> mike
>
>
>
>
>
> 1) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463550
>
>
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:09:05 +0200, Remy Blank wrote:
>
> > Just ignore the section "Installing into the kernel directory (for
> > static installs)" on that page, unless you have a very special install
> > (but then, you probably wouldn't hav
130401 Mick wrote:
> On Monday 01 Apr 2013 02:54:08 Philip Webb wrote:
>> I've spent a lot of today trying to fix a glitch in starting 'dhcpcd'
>> after upgrading to udev-200 ; I outlined it in a msg to gentoo-dev .
-- details snipped --
> Thanks for sharing this Philip.
> I was surprised to see
Look at bug 463550 [1]..
Either you downgrade to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.7.1-r2 or use
the patch which is pointed out at the bug.
mike
1) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463550
On Monday 01 April 2013 20:57:43 Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> I'm unable to compile chromium.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:37:07 + (UTC)
"Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)" wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> > Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> >> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> >>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
> ment
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> What do you mean by sane depclean? Are there any problems with
>> --depclean that I am not aware of?
>
> emerge -p --depclean
>
> generates dire warnings. I keep a previous version of the kernel
> (gentoo-sources) as a fallback, and --depcl
On 04/01/2013 09:54 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:29:08 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>
>>> MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set
>>> up aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you
>>> could still type eth0.
>
>> Frankly, I ne
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:29:08 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> > MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set
> > up aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you
> > could still type eth0.
> Frankly, I never found 'eth0' to be particularly friendly, either
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:12:17 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based
> > identification? I mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address
> > identity, the system name is just a label...
>
> MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you c
On 04/01/2013 09:12 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:57:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>> I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based identification? I
>> mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address identity, the system name
>> is just a label...
>
> MAC addresses are
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:24:33 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > No, you only do that if the original is not available. Copy the whole
> > sys-fs/udev directory to your overlay then remove the files you don't
> > need
>
> Well, that presupposes I know what files I need and what files I don't
> need...
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:19:18 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > What the article didn't mention was that if you change your interface
> > names, you have to create a new symlink in /etc/init.d and add it to
> > the default runlevel. I'm glad I spotted that one before rebooting:)
>
> So, just
>
> ln -
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:09:05 +0200, Remy Blank wrote:
> Just ignore the section "Installing into the kernel directory (for
> static installs)" on that page, unless you have a very special install
> (but then, you probably wouldn't have to ask here).
Yes, you only need that if you want the modules
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:57:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based identification? I
> mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address identity, the system name
> is just a label...
MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set up
a
On Monday 01 Apr 2013 04:37:50 luis jure wrote:
> on 2013-03-31 at 23:05 Michael Mol wrote:
> > On 03/31/2013 10:00 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
> > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/cyberwar-spun-sho
> > > ddy-journalism
> >
> > The G
On Monday 01 Apr 2013 02:54:08 Philip Webb wrote:
> I've spent a lot of today trying to fix a glitch in starting 'dhcpcd'
> after upgrading to udev-200 ; I outlined it in a msg to gentoo-dev .
>
> When I tried to start my I/net connection, I got this :
>
> root:501 ~> dhcpcd
> dhcpcd[831]
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> Do you really need to copy the files into the kernel tree?
No, you don't need to do that.
> which seems to pull in the daemon and the kmod so wouldn't the zfs-kmod
> ebuild build against the current kernel and drop in the modules
> directory all by itself much like any o
23 matches
Mail list logo
