Have anybody tried to compile openoffice 2.0 with --disable-cups ?
I think Openoffice is detecting cups printer (local printers)
automatically but it is not showing all the entries I have setup in
Kprinter.
With printer auto-detect I can not add any other printer via spadmin, so
I was wondering
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my
system.
Uwe
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more
stable on my system.
Uwe
I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only
32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs last time.
Dale
:-)
--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
--
The first file is only 32MB. There are more to come. :)
Uwe
Dale wrote:
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more
stable on my system.
Uwe
I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only
32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs
I'll agree here: I sometimes download a new binary to test before seeing
if I really want it - then compile it. Compiled is usually subjectively
faster, and definitely more stable.
Besides, as someone else put it, its more fun ...
BillK
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I
Uh Oh. Here goes my dial-up. I only get 26K here. Last time it took
three nights to get it all, about 24 hours total.
I may go visit my friend that has DSL. LOL
Dale
:-)
Uwe Klosa wrote:
The first file is only 32MB. There are more to come. :)
Uwe
Dale wrote:
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I
On 2005-11-30 08:12:34 +0100 (Wed, Nov), Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 03:00 am, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Klosa to
write:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on
my system.
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an issue.
The only thing I noticed is that the compiled
Ernie Schroder wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 03:00 am, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Klosa to
write:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on
my system.
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an issue.
The only thing I
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my
system.
Uwe
[snip]
I've compile OO 2.0 without any errors.
But when I just open and save a spreadsheet OO 2.0 crashed on me with
[signal.11].
Not a good
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:30:24 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an
issue. The only thing I noticed is that the compiled version opens
faster than the binary version. As I remember, the difference was
roughly 7 seconds. It seems like
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 09:18 am, a tiny voice compelled Neil Bothwick
to write:
Except that you don't sit and watch it compile (unless you are
exceptionally sad
You mean you don't have to keep watch over long compiles? I guess I have no
life.
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ernie Schroder wrote:
time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running. I can never remember
to do those long builds while I sleep so I end up, in this case, and for
Well, I wrote a latemerge script that sets up an at cron job :P - So, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
Well, I wrote a latemerge script that sets up an at cron job :P - So, I
emerge it in the
moment but starts at night.
sed -e 's/cron//'
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar
Consultor en Seguridad
Ernie Schroder wrote:
I've recently done 11 months worth of updates on this box and have about 40
hours of build time on it in the last 10 days. I want to use it, not watch
more text fly by on the console.
Try compiling it at a lower priority.
I just put this in my /etc/make.conf file:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the source code version.
Uwe
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with
the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the source code version.
Uwe
What do you mean import your settings from an older OO
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the source code version.
Uwe
What do you mean import your settings
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:35:48 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours that it takes to build OO is
not down time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running.
No thanks, I'm broke enough as it is :(
I can
never remember to do those long builds while I
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:48 +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue
with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the
Ernie Schroder wrote:
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours that it takes to build OO is not down
time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running. I can never remember
to do those long builds while I sleep so I end up, in this case, and for
firefox, going for the immediate
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little.
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded
portions can save a lot if the link drops out halfway.
Make sure you use the -P option (read
On Thursday 01 December 2005 03:17, W.Kenworthy wrote:
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little.
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded
portions can save a lot if the
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
--
#Joseph
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around 8-11 hours on such a machine. It
took somewhere around 10 hours for me on a
Make sure all nfs services are running on client and server.
OR
you have iptables running and you are blocking random nfs service ports.
Check both client and server.
run rpcinfo -p on each machine to see what ports need to be open. It might
be better to just allow anything to go between
Solved the problem.
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
# file locking now enabled by default
#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
as simple as it gets.
yours,
kos
--
On 10/27/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solved the problem.Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out thefollowing lines:# file locking now enabled by default#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
I
tried it,
but it did not solve the issue on my box.
I guess, i'll stick to the commenting out the file_locking
yours,
kos
--
Respectfully,
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko
Arhont Ltd - Information Security
web:http://www.arhont.com
http://www.wi-foo.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko wrote:
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
either that or run lockd...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bruno Lustosa wrote:
It seems rpc.statd isn't running, because status monitor doesn't show on
the list.
ah.. that's right. lockd needs statd. silly nfs.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
As discussed in this thread
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
QTE
++
1 On certain Linux machines, file locking is known to fail due to the
NFS lock demon not running.
2 On certain other Linux machines, it appears that file locking fails
due to some other, not yet
Hi list,
I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,
that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2
hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine with nfs, and such
problem never happened with OpenOffice 1.x
The problem happens on two gentoo
On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine with nfs, and suchproblem never happened with
On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bruno Lustosa wrote:On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine
On 10/26/05, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in
my experience samba works better for that sort of thing anyway.
If a server serving an nfs share goes down, all the computers with that
share mounted will go nuts, spending 100% cpu trying to get the share
back. Samba seems to fail more
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:24:07 -0600
Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta era. For a while,
I've had issues with the responsiveness when I click a menu or use the
scroll bar with my mouse. Clicking a menu or scrolling with the mouse
causes
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta era. For a while,
I've had issues with the responsiveness when I click a menu or use the
scroll bar with my mouse. Clicking a menu or scrolling with the mouse
causes the program to pause for a few seconds before something happens.
I don't
yes,i am wait a long time too
i have another problem too
when i double click one file,openoffice can't open it ,gave me some error message look like can't find file ***.xls
but the ***.xls was exist
thx2005/10/22, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 09:53 am, James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
There is an
James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
I never got it to compile, but I have been using
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:44 am, Richard Fish wrote:
James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it
On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:53:16 + (UTC), James wrote:
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
There's already an ebuild for 1.9.95, a beta of 2.0, in portage, but it
is masked. If you want to try it,
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:53 +, James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
As someone
By the way, I merged openoffice-bin 1.9.93 . I don't see the beta
versions in the standard (non-bin) ebuild.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 12 May 2005 03:42:01 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
There is an ebuild for the beta somewhere, I'll look for it if you are
interested.
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill.
pgpoFG3pJs8u3.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 16:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2005 03:42:01 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
There is an ebuild for the beta somewhere, I'll look for it if you are
interested.
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
--
On Wed, May 11, 2005 8:53 pm, Nick Rout said:
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
Who wants to spend 12 hours building beta software that will probably have
been updated before the merge has finished?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 04:04 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 8:53 pm, Nick Rout said:
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
Who wants to spend 12 hours building beta software that will probably have
been updated before the merge has
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
And I built OpenOffice once, it ended up running slower than OpenOffice-bin...
How come?
I have noticed the same effect with Mozilla-software. At least I get the
feeling that the binaries are a little faster -- I can't really say for
sure.
Sigi
--
S. Schwartz wrote:
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
And I built OpenOffice once, it ended up running slower than
OpenOffice-bin...
How come?
I have noticed the same effect with Mozilla-software. At least I get
the feeling that the binaries are a little faster -- I can't really
say for sure.
Hi,
I'm still trying to figure out why my install doesn't execute for normal
users. So OO only works for root. Upon the ooffice command a normal
user gets a message regarding setup or something like that, then it
aborts.
I believe its not supposed to be started as ooffice, but as one of
In OOo you do what the call a net install first which installs everything.
The each user runs another setup (in the OOo programs directory) which
then sets the user up - you do this for each user. The OOo install guide
has all this in it for various operating systems in more detail.
On Wed,
54 matches
Mail list logo
