[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild: package specific CFLAGS

On 04/28/2017 10:10 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I'm trying to create an ebuild of a crufty old program that needs > -fgnu89-inline in compiler flags to have any chance of building. > > What's the way to do that in an ebuild? I could have something like > > src_configure() { > econf $(use_enab

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild: package specific CFLAGS

Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:14:10 -0400 schrieb John Covici : > On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:10:42 -0400, > Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > > I'm trying to create an ebuild of a crufty old program that needs > > -fgnu89-inline in compiler flags to have any chance of building. > > > > What's the way to do that i

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for canon ufr ii lt driver . Anyone got it ?

On 04/08/2014 11:20 PM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > Canon just came out with a driver for my printer i-Sensys lbp 7100cn > (yay!) . It was promised september 2013 (grumble). It is downloadable > from here : >

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for "gcc-independent llvm and clang for linux"

Sorry for earlier mis-send. I send the article again. I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my "Linux" PC as 1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang. 2. The binaries of 1. depend on libc++.so instead of libstdc++.so. 3. libc++.so was

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for "gcc-independent llvm and clang for linux"

Sorry, I mistook the operation of Gmail. I will send with full-written article again. 2013/12/26 やまぐちたかゆき : > Hello everybody, > > I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my "Linux" PC as > 1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang. > 2. The binaries

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild

On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:52:01 + (UTC) James wrote: > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise > > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq > > http://overlays.gentoo.org/ Thanks, yes i has read the manual of Gentoo. Now understand it more :) Is only private maybe i make on my

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild

Silvio Siefke web.de> writes: > i has make a ebuild, but i not so sure what must do for build Process. http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/common-mistakes/ http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/index.html https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Submitting_ebuilds > But what i must do. Th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild not inserting soname, therefore emerging zlib fails

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Alberto Luaces writes: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Paul Hartman writes: >> >>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote: Hello, I have searched quite a bit for an error I'm having when emerging current zlib-1.2.5-r2

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild not inserting soname, therefore emerging zlib fails

Alberto Luaces writes: > Hi Paul, > > Paul Hartman writes: > >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have searched quite a bit for an error I'm having when emerging >>> current zlib-1.2.5-r2. The problem is that somehow the soname is not >>> written in the

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild not inserting soname, therefore emerging zlib fails

Hi Paul, Paul Hartman writes: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have searched quite a bit for an error I'm having when emerging >> current zlib-1.2.5-r2. The problem is that somehow the soname is not >> written in the .so file, and the build process fail

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild hacking howto

Mark Shields gmail.com> writes: > Saw that you linked to the "creating an updated ebuild" from gentoo-wiki, so what I say may overlay quite a bit, but hear me out: > Attachment (jffnms-0.8.5.ebuild): application/octet-stream, 2207 bytes Mark, I appreciate your answer very much. I'm looking at

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild hacking howto

James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > Any other documents I should reference before > attempinging to update an ebuild on my own > person overlay dir? What about this link: rpm --> ebuild ? a tool that generates an ebuild from a rpm package? http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/ src

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild creation (python-2.7) - please help

On 12/12/10 14:52:28, walt wrote: > On 12/12/2010 03:33 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after switching to Python-2.7 an ebuild of myself fails. > > I'm trying to write an ebuild for dev-python/pyparsing- > > > > My attemp fails with 'setup.py' not found. > > Have you tried using t

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild creation (python-2.7) - please help

On 12/12/2010 03:33 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, after switching to Python-2.7 an ebuild of myself fails. I'm trying to write an ebuild for dev-python/pyparsing- My attemp fails with 'setup.py' not found. Have you tried using the -d flag with emerge? The debugging output may tell you

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild description

Michael P. Soulier wrote: > msoul...@anton:~$ grep DESCRIPTION > /usr/portage/dev-libs/libassuan/libassuan-1.0 > .5.ebuild > DESCRIPTION="Standalone IPC library used by gpg, gpgme and newpg" > > Great, that helps. Still, I wouldn't think that grep would be the best say, so > I looked in the emerg

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

2008/12/14 James : > should have said "profiler" > Breaking down algorithms and make a fundamentally better > algo for a gpu, will require a really good "profiler" to > imho. So far I'd be happy at being able to run something and leave the evaluation of gains at a theoretical level. >> Anyway, it

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

Miguel Ramos <2008 miguel.ramos.name> writes: > > http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15886 > > I sure hope we get at least a function level profile > > that works with gcc with Catalyst 8.12. should have said "profiler" Breaking down algorithms and make a fundamentally better algo for a gpu,

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

Alan McKinnon wrote: On Friday 12 December 2008 01:24:27 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: [...] Then did the above command. All it did was creating a file autounmask-xorg-server with this inside: # --- # BEGIN: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3 # --- =x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3 ~amd64 # --- # END

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

On Friday 12 December 2008 01:24:27 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:16:59 +, Miguel Ramos wrote: > >> I did put the lengthly list of files in package.keywords with ~amd64, > >> but I'm not sure this is the beast approach in the long run. > > > > Make /

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:16:59 +, Miguel Ramos wrote: I did put the lengthly list of files in package.keywords with ~amd64, but I'm not sure this is the beast approach in the long run. Make /etc/portage/package.keywords a directory, then run autounmask x11-base/xorg-se

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

2008/12/11 Nikos Chantziaras : > Same here, plus that switching to VTs and back to X a couple of times hangs > the machine. That's has always the case with fglrx, with any version ever > produced, on any distro you can imagine. Oh, I can't believe! I'm almost sure at some point this afternoon I g

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

Miguel Ramos wrote: 2008/12/11 Volker Armin Hemmann : But the result isn't very good. I have the following behaviour consistently: boot system, X starts fine, I close X on purpose, second time X doesn't start, receives signal 11, third time on starting X my system hangs badly and I have to press

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

2008/12/11 James : > Did you see this? > > http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15886 > > I sure hope we get at least a function level profile > that works with gcc with Catalyst 8.12. > > > I await your respone. I took a look at your link but I can't see what I was expected to see. Anyway, it see

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

Miguel Ramos <2008 miguel.ramos.name> writes: > Thanks for the info. > It really looks like the 8.12 is more recent than the 8.54.3 after all... > I'm going to try to install this one and I'll get back to you. > As to GPU programming, I'm certainly there too! > However, there is another obstacle

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

2008/12/11 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "ATI Stream Computing Support" > > It seems that with ATI Catalyst 8.12, we commoners can > finally access and program so that the GPU is another > available processor for us to access and use. > > > Anyone with information, particularly relate to 'howto' >

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?

Miguel Ramos <2008 miguel.ramos.name> writes: > I'm new to these lists. > I have just come up with an ebuild for the most recent ATI driver for > FirePro/FireGL chips. > Previous ebuilds didn't work due to problems compiling fgl_glxgears; > so this one is better because it solves these issues an

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > < SNIP > > > But since I don't I just moved the directory. :) > > > That's what I would have done too. LOL Dale :-) :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> There is a wiki article http://gentoo-wiki.com/PortageFileList which >>> contains a python script, which sends updates from ones personal box to the >>> database server. As this project communit

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> There is a wiki article http://gentoo-wiki.com/PortageFileList which >> contains a python script, which sends updates from ones personal box to the >> database server. As this project community dependent a lot of users should >> help

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is a wiki article http://gentoo-wiki.com/PortageFileList which > contains a python script, which sends updates from ones personal box to the > database server. As this project community dependent a lot of users should > help to update the database. That script

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

There is a wiki article http://gentoo-wiki.com/PortageFileList which contains a python script, which sends updates from ones personal box to the database server. As this project community dependent a lot of users should help to update the database. On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:07:31 +0200, Alan McKinno

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

On Monday 14 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > www.portagefilelist.de *Very* useful link - thanks! alan > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:04:18 +0100, Michael Schmarck > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There a site out there that lists files in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

www.portagefilelist.de On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:04:18 +0100, Michael Schmarck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There a site out there that lists files installed for just about all >> gentoo ebuilds, could some kind soul post the url for me please? > > I

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild that installs partprobe

Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There a site out there that lists files installed for just about all > gentoo ebuilds, could some kind soul post the url for me please? I suppose you're talking about PFS, Portage File Search at http://www.rommel.stw.uni-erlangen.de/~fejf/pfs/ - but that

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for a rails application

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:06:12 -0700, darren kirby wrote: > An ebuild is little more than a shell script with some helper/hook > functions built in. So: if the install of your rails app is scriptable, > then yes, you should be able to write an ebuild for it. > > As for whether there is an eclass o

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for python-fuse?

b.n. wrote: > I am looking for the python bindings to FUSE, since I want to write a > little thing taking advantage of it. > Unfortunately in the portage tree I can only find bindings for ruby and > perl, but not for python. It could be the moment to learn ruby or perl, > but it would be another

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [ebuild] make ebuild use custom ./configure arg

On 9/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Or is it something I can correct by just generating my own post edit md5 checksum? Yes. "ebuild digest". So run: ebuild /usr/local/portage/net-fs/samba/samba-3.0.23c.ebuild digest HTH, -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: [ebuild] make ebuild use custom ./configure arg

Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 01:00:06 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'm trying to make my own ebuild of samba, jumping to latest release >> 23c. After creating the overlay and moving the current 23a there >> renamed as 23c. I'd like to make ebuild use on

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild and emacs enough is enough

On Monday 06 February 2006 15:12, Harry Putnam wrote: > Francesco Talamona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I know for sure a developer belonging to emacs herd is actively > > participating to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ok good tip. Does this fellow have a public mail address for dev > work? Yes, of co

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild and emacs enough is enough

Francesco Talamona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 06 February 2006 03:10, Harry Putnam wrote: >> Where do I need to take this complaint? > > Perhaps gentoodev mailing list is the right place for this topic. > I suggest to provide some real life example and pointers to manpage/URLs > supp

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild and emacs enough is enough

Francesco Talamona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know for sure a developer belonging to emacs herd is actively > participating to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok good tip. Does this fellow have a public mail address for dev work? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild and emacs enough is enough

On Monday 06 February 2006 03:10, Harry Putnam wrote: > Where do I need to take this complaint? Perhaps gentoodev mailing list is the right place for this topic. I suggest to provide some real life example and pointers to manpage/URLs supporting your claims. I know for sure a developer belonging

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

Stroller schreef: > > On 26 Dec 2005, at 20:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:46:55 +0100, Peper wrote: >> >>> Yes, I do know that and that's why i proposed a new solution for >>> this - emerge would handle showing license and user will accept >>> or decline it. If user accep

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

On 26 Dec 2005, at 20:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:46:55 +0100, Peper wrote: Yes, I do know that and that's why i proposed a new solution for this - emerge would handle showing license and user will accept or decline it. If user accepts fetching starts... Which would

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:46:55 +0100, Peper wrote: > Yes, I do know that and that's why i proposed a new solution for this - > emerge would handle showing license and user will accept or decline it. > If user accepts fetching starts... Which would almost certainly break Sun's licence, they want to

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

> Click on the SDK and it takes you to a separate page with a long legal > license with an accept or decline. Then it triggers the download. Sun's > website handles all that, not the target system. Yes, I do know that and that's why i proposed a new solution for this - emerge would handle showin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:48:25 +0100 Peper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While writing this i thought about smth: cannot displaying licenses be > implemented in emerge? If you want to progress(fetch the file) you must > accept displayed license. Maybe sun will be happy with that... > Licenses ar

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

> > And there are also some packages like cedega, which you must even > > dowload by torrent :P > > After you have subscribed (which is the real reason for the fetch > restriction)? > > It's only a <10MB rpm/deb/tgz, why would you have to download it by > torrent? > > In that particular case, Cedeg

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

Peper schreef: > And there are also some packages like cedega, which you must even > dowload by torrent :P After you have subscribed (which is the real reason for the fetch restriction)? It's only a <10MB rpm/deb/tgz, why would you have to download it by torrent? In that particular case, Cedega i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:41:10 -0600, Dale wrote: > >It's all about reading software license, which noone reads anyway :] > I didn't read it on their site either. I don't see what difference it > makes really. The difference is that you acknowledged that you had read it, even if you didn't. That

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

Peper wrote: You see that little "f" there next to the ebuild? It has a fetch restriction. If you look a little ways up it will give you the URL to go to to accept the license and download it. After you download the java thing, move it to /usr/portage/distfiles/ then emerge it. I do this all

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for dev-java/sun-j2sdk?

> You see that little "f" there next to the ebuild? It has a fetch > restriction. If you look a little ways up it will give you the URL to > go to to accept the license and download it. After you download the > java thing, move it to /usr/portage/distfiles/ then emerge it. I do > this all the t

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild with scons and sandbox

On 8/16/05, Nagatoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > First off, I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to ask! > > I'm trying to write an ebuild for linuxdcpp (a gtk port of DC++). This > nice app uses scons and not make as the build tool. When I build it > manually it works just fine, but w

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild for RealPlayer-10.0.4 not working: Aborting before download

On Thu, 12 May 2005, Yoann Pannier wrote: > Holly Bostick wrote, On 05/12/2005 03:48 AM: > > As for why your download failed with such a weird error, I cannot say, > > but maybe it has something to do with it being a https:// url? > > Oh, a wget installed without ssl in USE flags ? Yes, but this

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild for RealPlayer-10.0.4 not working: Aborting before download

Holly Bostick wrote, On 05/12/2005 03:48 AM: > As for why your download failed with such a weird error, I cannot say, > but maybe it has something to do with it being a https:// url? Oh, a wget installed without ssl in USE flags ? -- Yoann Pannier -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Ebuild for RealPlayer-10.0.4 not working: Aborting before download

Urs Schuetz wrote, On 05/12/2005 03:11 AM: > Where expects portage the downloaded RealPlayer to be? Can it > just be moved there, or has something else to be done? In `portageq distdir`. Yes, no. -- Yoann Pannier -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list