it's worth noting that a failing power supply can produce what seem to be ram
problems. it happened to me, swapping ram, a motherboard and then a power
supply made it clear.
--
Note the right side (his right) of Mr. Trumps face, He's clearly had a major
stroke or similar neurological insult.
On 2017-10-11, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> What's called Management in ISO9000.
>
> ISO9000 still lets you shoot yourself in the foot. You just wrote
> down that you were going to shoot yourself in the foot
On Wednesday, 11 October 2017 04:02:36 BST R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
> > What's called Management in ISO9000.
>
> ISO9000 still lets you shoot yourself in the foot. You just wrote down
> that you were going to shoot yourself
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> What's called Management in ISO9000.
>
ISO9000 still lets you shoot yourself in the foot. You just wrote down
that you were going to shoot yourself in the foot well in advance.
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 11:46:22 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:20:53 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> > It turns out that over the past week or so, there have been several
> >
> > _different_ firefox ebuilds released. One of them was broken:
> > Version 52.4.0 (Oct 3)
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 12:27:25 CEST schrieb Marc Joliet:
> (Note that it does *not* search the description by default, and doesn't
> claim to, either!)
Ha, I tried to find a way to search only the description, but came up empty
(you *can* search the description by searching through all
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:20:53 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> It turns out that over the past week or so, there have been several
> _different_ firefox ebuilds released. One of them was broken:
>
> Version 52.4.0 (Oct 3) was OK.
>
> Version 52.4.0 (Oct 7) was broken.
>
> Version
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 02:57:21 CEST schrieb Grant Edwards:
> On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote:
> > On Monday, October 9, 2017, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> >> On 2017-10-09, allan gottlieb wrote:
> >>> This is a know bug see
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017, 11:19:02 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Monday, 9 October 2017 20:20:53 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
> > I don't really see how you can repeatedly release new versions of
> > something without changing the version number, but maybe that's just me...
>
> No, it isn't
On Monday, 9 October 2017 20:20:53 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
> I don't really see how you can repeatedly release new versions of
> something without changing the version number, but maybe that's just me...
No, it isn't just you. What you describe is a classic example of a developer
trying to
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> On Monday, October 9, 2017, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2017-10-09, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>>
This is a know bug
On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Monday, October 9, 2017, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2017-10-09, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> This is a know bug see https://bugs.gentoo.org/633790
>>
>> Yep, that's it. Yet when you search for
On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote:
> Your compiler is barfing at something, but I'm no coder to know what this
> might be. In a Gentoo context, I'd start by checking you have installed and
> switched to sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3 which is the latest stable version and at
>
On 2017-10-09, allan gottlieb wrote:
> This is a know bug see https://bugs.gentoo.org/633790
Yep, that's it. Yet when you search for roundingflags or
shapedtextflags in Gentoo's bugzilla, it finds nothing. Has the
search feature in Bugzilla ever worked?
--
Grant Edwards
On Mon, Oct 09 2017, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-10-09, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>>> In this case the namespace of the missing declaration is inside
>>> Mozilla's, e.g. it is part of Firefox or a closely bundled
On 2017-10-09, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> In this case the namespace of the missing declaration is inside
>> Mozilla's, e.g. it is part of Firefox or a closely bundled library.
>
> Yep, after a bit more research, that was
On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote:
> In this case the namespace of the missing declaration is inside
> Mozilla's, e.g. it is part of Firefox or a closely bundled library.
Yep, after a bit more research, that was my conclusion.
The chromium build finished happily, so I've just
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-10-08, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> Usually what happens is it will be corrupted in RAM after being
>> verified on disk, and faulty results will be saved to disk from RAM. A
>> user on the forums
On 2017-10-08, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Usually what happens is it will be corrupted in RAM after being
> verified on disk, and faulty results will be saved to disk from RAM. A
> user on the forums recently had this issue compiling dev-lang/vala,
> and I have had related issues.
I've
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote:
>> This won't harm, although I would expect portage would complain and
>> not run the emerge if downloads were corrupted somehow.
>
> True, but I couldn't think
On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 October 2017 18:02:43 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I was afraid it might be failing RAM, but a second attempt failed in
>> exactly the same way. I guess I'll delete the ebuild files and the
>> source tarball to force a
On Sunday, 8 October 2017 18:02:43 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
> I was afraid it might be failing RAM, but a second attempt failed in
> exactly the same way. I guess I'll delete the ebuild files and the
> source tarball to force a download and then try again.
This won't harm, although I would
On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 October 2017 03:51:41 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
>> When I did my usual update today firefox 52.4.0 failed to build.
>> There are thousands of compiler warnings in the build log, but the
>> only thing I can find that looks like an
23 matches
Mail list logo