Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild finds nothing, while revdep-rebuild.sh wants to rebuild the whole system

On 10/17/2017 10:40 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Running the new revdep-rebuild finds nothing:  $ sudo revdep-rebuild -i -- -a   * This is the new python coded version   * Please report any bugs found using it.   * The original revdep-rebuild script is installed as revdep-rebuild.sh   * Please f

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild ignoring Ctrl-C

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:35:30 +0100, Willie WY Wong wrote: > Before it starts the emerge process, I can interrupt revdep-rebuild > with Ctrl-C > > After it starts the emerge process, hitting Ctrl-C on the console > drops me to bash, but evidently the emerge / revdep-rebuild continues > running. (Th

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

On August 20, 2012 15:27:54 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Montag, 20. August 2012, 01:00:34 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > > On 2012-08-19 at 01:02:24 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012, 00:37:36 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > > > >emerge --update --pretend > >

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

Am Montag, 20. August 2012, 01:00:34 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > On 2012-08-19 at 01:02:24 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012, 00:37:36 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > > > Hi, > > > I'm using Gentoo for a couple of years and am quite amazed how good it > > > works.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

On 2012-08-19 at 01:02:24 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012, 00:37:36 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > > Hi, > > I'm using Gentoo for a couple of years and am quite amazed how good it > > works. So thanks to all involved in its develpoment. > > > > However, after

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:02:38 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > please enlighten me which update breaks a system. Can't remember > > > one. Hm, back with libss&co maybe? > > > > jpeg-7, expat2 > > both broke world, not system. expat broke system here, but that is ancient history

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012, 01:20:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > A few extra inline comments to reinforce what you just said: > > > My propsal is to add a warning similar to that I get when portage > > > updates are available, so that users know in advance that a > > > particular update will break t

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

A few extra inline comments to reinforce what you just said: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 01:02:24 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012, 00:37:36 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > > Hi, > > I'm using Gentoo for a couple of years and am quite amazed how good > > it works. So thanks

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012, 00:37:36 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > Hi, > I'm using Gentoo for a couple of years and am quite amazed how good it > works. So thanks to all involved in its develpoment. > > However, after today's update, when I run revdep-rebuild, I get the > message > > * Checking

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

I have decided to upgrade my system. I haven't done it for awhile because it takes so long on a Intel Nano with 1GB of RAM. I normally only upgrade the programs I use to most along with any upgrade requirements that it has. This may be what is causing all of my problems. On 06/05/2012 09:03 PM, Pa

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Willie Matthews > wrote: >> ("> >>  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be >>  * installed at the same time on the same system. >> >>  (sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r2::gentoo, installed)

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Willie Matthews wrote: > (" >  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be >  * installed at the same time on the same system. > >  (sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >    >=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r6 required by (virtu

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 >>> Rafa Griman wrote: >>> Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth >>

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 >> Rafa Griman wrote: >> >>> Hi Vaeth :) >>> >>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth >>> wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 > Rafa Griman wrote: > >> Hi Vaeth :) >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: >> >> >> >> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:spac

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 Rafa Griman wrote: > Hi Vaeth :) > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth > wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: > >> > >> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ > > > > > > Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

Hi Vaeth :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: >> >> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ > > > Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with > current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. > Not s

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

Hey !! On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: [...] > And some basic info: > Post the entire content of /etc/make.conf and the output of "emerge > --info" OK, back again. Here goes: # emerge --info Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/x86/10.0, gcc-4.5.3, glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.12-g

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

Hi :) On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:34:07 +0200 > Rafa Griman wrote: > >> Hi all :) >> >> New to this mailing list. I'm installing Gentoo and when I run >> revdep-rebuild I get the following error >> >> # revdep-rebuild >>  * Configuring search en

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:34:07 +0200 Rafa Griman wrote: > Hi all :) > > New to this mailing list. I'm installing Gentoo and when I run > revdep-rebuild I get the following error > > # revdep-rebuild > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps repeating the same steps

On Fri, 25. May 14:47, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:41:36 +0200 > 1126 wrote: > > > Hello list! > > > > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and > > over again. > > > > Here is what I mean: > > > > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebui

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps repeating the same steps

On Fri, 25. May 13:47, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, 1126 > wrote: > > Hello list! > > > > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and over > > again. > > > > Here is what I mean: > > > >  * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > >

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps repeating the same steps

On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:41:36 +0200 1126 wrote: > Hello list! > > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and > over again. > > Here is what I mean: > > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > > * Checking reverse dependencies > * Packages containing

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps repeating the same steps

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, 1126 wrote: > Hello list! > > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and over > again. > > Here is what I mean: > >  * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > >  * Checking reverse dependencies >  * Packages containing binarie

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild question

On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:30 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> > >> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild > >> which found nothing to to.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild question

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild >> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to >> execute revdep-rebui

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild question

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Greetings, > > after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild > which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to > execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages > were fo

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild Not Fixing Broken Links

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:23 AM, wrote: > On my amd64 laptop I have broken links that never clear up. The emul-linux-x86-gtklibs is a binary package (32bit compatibility), so re-emerging it won't make any difference. The package maintainer will need to build a new version which links to the newer

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild + minimal output

* Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:52:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has > > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me > > via email. > > There is the --quiet option, but this doesn't remove

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild + minimal output

revdep-rebuild -pv 2010/7/10 Neil Bothwick > On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:52:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has > > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me > > via email. > > There is the --quiet option, but th

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild + minimal output

On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:52:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me > via email. There is the --quiet option, but this doesn't remove everything. You could try redirecting

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild + minimal output

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 05:11:49AM -0400, Willie Wong wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 06:52:35AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has > > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me > > via email. > > Usually "is th

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild + minimal output

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 06:52:35AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me > via email. Usually "is there an option..." questions are well-answered by "man ". And in this case

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild looking for non-existant dev-libs/poppler

On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 17:44 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > I'm doing "revdep-rebuild --library libjpeg.so.7". It finds broken > packages, It gets to the point of... > = > * Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr > * Cleaning list of packages to rebuild > *

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 22:13/02/04/10, Leon Feng wrote: > ??? 2010/2/4 05:45:00???Harry Putnam ??? > > After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils > > broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another > > revdep-rebuild and it f

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:13:20 +0800, Leon Feng wrote: > I have seen this for weeks, but since I upgrade to portage-2.2* at the > same time, do not know whether it is related. My revdep-rebuild out is > listed below, anyone has a solution? Are you also running the testing gentoolkit? Otherwise you'r

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

Hi Leon, have you really run lafilefixer --justfixit and some time, ago, I had problems because of dangling symlinks, so I've run symlinks -dr /usr (which remove all dangling symlinks in /usr/**/*) Then re-emerge sys-devel/binutils again I hope this helps,m Helmut. On 4 Feb, Leon Feng wr

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

在 2010/2/4 05:45:00，Harry Putnam ： > After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils > broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another > revdep-rebuild and it finds the same thing. > > Anyone seen something similar or have an idea what might be the problem?

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 15:45/02/03/10, Harry Putnam wrote: > After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils > broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another > revdep-rebuild and it finds the same thing. > > Anyone seen somethin

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

On Wednesday 03 February 2010 23:45:00 Harry Putnam wrote: > After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils > broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another > revdep-rebuild and it finds the same thing. > > Anyone seen something similar or have an idea wha

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

On 2 Jan, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > yes, get rid of the app that needs kde3 and move on. > Very good idea, indeed. Then, please, tell me a replacement for app-office/kexi. Thanks! -- Helmut Jarausch Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik RWTH - Aachen University D 52056 Aachen, Germany

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

--- On Sat, 2/1/10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > From: Volker Armin Hemmann > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Saturday, 2 January, 2010, 12:05 > On Samstag 02 Januar 2010, Jon > Hardcastle

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

Philip Webb wrote: 100102 Dale wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: Unfortunately there are some apps that do not have KDE4 replacements. While I understand the Gentoo devs decision to drop the KDE3 desktop and apps from portage, kdelibs should be kept as long as there are apps depending on it.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

100102 Dale wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> Unfortunately there are some apps that do not have KDE4 replacements. >> While I understand the Gentoo devs decision to drop the KDE3 desktop >> and apps from portage, kdelibs should be kept as long as there are apps >> depending on it. dropping all tho

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:05:44 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: yes, get rid of the app that needs kde3 and move on. Unfortunately there are some apps that do not have KDE4 replacements. While I understand the Gentoo devs decision to drop the KDE3 desktop and apps

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:05:44 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > yes, get rid of the app that needs kde3 and move on. Unfortunately there are some apps that do not have KDE4 replacements. While I understand the Gentoo devs decision to drop the KDE3 desktop and apps from portage, kdelibs should be

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

Jon Hardcastle wrote: Hi I am trying to run revdep-rebuild and it gets to the emerge stage and i get this !! All ebuilds that could satisfy "kde-base/kdelibs:3.5" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.10-r6 (maske

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild and kde-base/kdelibs:3.5

On Samstag 02 Januar 2010, Jon Hardcastle wrote: > Hi I am trying to run revdep-rebuild and it gets to the emerge stage and i > get this > > !! All ebuilds that could satisfy "kde-base/kdelibs:3.5" have been masked. > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > reques

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:40:35 +, Graham Murray wrote: > The difference is that with the new @preserved-rebuild the 'old' library > is not deleted until all of the dependent packages have been > successfully rebuilt to use the 'new' library. This also means that if you don't run emerge @preserv

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild [was: Kmplayer, video and audio not syncing.]

Thanks everyone for the input, it's being quite informative and valuable. I guess I'll have to research on this at some point. Still I'd like to keep responses coming if anyone can bring some light into the issue. :) I am responding only to one post, but I've read Alan's one as well, as said, than

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild [was: Kmplayer, video and audio not syncing.]

Jesús Guerrero writes: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:12:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On Monday 02 November 2009 15:58:57 Jesús Guerrero wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:25:08 +, Neil Bothwick > >> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:58:03 +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote: > >> >> @preserved-

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild [was: Kmplayer, video and audio not syncing.]

On Monday 02 November 2009 17:01:17 Jesús Guerrero wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:12:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon > > wrote: > > On Monday 02 November 2009 15:58:57 Jesús Guerrero wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:25:08 +, Neil Bothwick > >> > >> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:58:03 +0100,

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild

Jesús Guerrero writes: > Thanks for the feedback. However there's one thing I can't understand: > whether the libraries are kept of removed is decided at the merge time, > isn't it? So, whatever breaks, breaks when using "emerge" to update the > offending library, the one that will break the ABI.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild [was: Kmplayer, video and audio not syncing.]

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:12:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 02 November 2009 15:58:57 Jesús Guerrero wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:25:08 +, Neil Bothwick >> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:58:03 +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote: >> >> @preserved-rebuild never worked for me, maybe

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On 04/07/09 09:29, Paul Hartman wrote: Here is my cpuinfo; cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 47 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 1802.243 cache size : 512 KB fpu

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Joseph wrote: > On 04/07/09 09:12, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:49 Joseph wrote: >>> >>> On 04/06/09 21:20, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> >On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote: >>> >> I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On 04/07/09 09:12, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:49 Joseph wrote: On 04/06/09 21:20, Alan McKinnon wrote: >On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote: >> I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that >> did not compile was g-wrap. However, when

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:12:30 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I wish I could provide more information, the cursor just seats there, there > > is no error messages at the console. Which log " revdep-rebuild" writes to? > > > > I'm rebuilding the system with the old CFLAGS so I'll have more informatio

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:49 Joseph wrote: > On 04/06/09 21:20, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote: > >> I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that > >> did not compile was g-wrap. However, when I run "revdep-rebuild" it > >> qui

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On 04/06/09 21:20, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote: I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that did not compile was g-wrap. However, when I run "revdep-rebuild" it quits at 21% Does anybody know how to fix it? I tried recompiling g

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21%

On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote: > I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that > did not compile was g-wrap. However, when I run "revdep-rebuild" it quits > at 21% > Does anybody know how to fix it? > > I tried recompiling gentoolkit; did not help. Error

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

Nick Fortino wrote: > John P. Burkett wrote: >> Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response >> the included the following lines: >> * All prepared. Starting rebuild >> emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0 >> gnome-base/gnome-panel:0 >> kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5 >> mail-client/-MERGI

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild problem

John P. Burkett wrote: > Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response > the included the following lines: > * All prepared. Starting rebuild > emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0 > gnome-base/gnome-panel:0 > kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5 > mail-client/-MERGING-evolution:2.0 > media-plug

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

On Monday 26 January 2009 12:01:57 Richard Marzan wrote: > I remember having a similar issue. Try blocking all gcc versions prior to > 4.0. As for uninstalling the current 3.x version -- I don't know how you > would remove it since you need the ebuild script that initially installed > the current 3

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:01:57 -0500, Richard Marzan wrote: > I don't know how you would remove it since you need the ebuild script > that initially installed the current 3.x on your system to remove it > safely. Which is kept in /var/db/pkg -- Neil Bothwick Do Roman paramedics refer to IV's as

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

I remember having a similar issue. Try blocking all gcc versions prior to 4.0. As for uninstalling the current 3.x version -- I don't know how you would remove it since you need the ebuild script that initially installed the current 3.x on your system to remove it safely. Have you updated your s

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

Actually it look like revdep is writng emerge command wrong. cat 4_ebuilds.rr app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs:0 sys-devel/gcc:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 sys-devel/gcc:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.2 emerge -pv sys-devel/gcc:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 while emerge gcc or emerge - sys-devel/gcc:4.3 d

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

Vizo Allman wrote: > I updated profile using gcc-config and re emerged same error > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Saphirus Sage > wrote: > > Vizo Allman wrote: > > I keep getting this message when I run revdep-rebuild : > > "emerge: there are no ebuil

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

[ebuild R ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2 Thats wht I get -vizo- On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Vizo Allman wrote: > > I keep getting this message when I run revdep-rebuild : > > "emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy > > "sys-devel/gcc

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

I updated profile using gcc-config and re emerged same error On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Saphirus Sage wrote: > Vizo Allman wrote: > > I keep getting this message when I run revdep-rebuild : > > "emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy > > "sys-devel/gcc:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6" > > I have

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Vizo Allman wrote: > I keep getting this message when I run revdep-rebuild : > "emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy > "sys-devel/gcc:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6" > I have no idea how to begin to troubleshoot this. Any hints? what does "emerge -p gcc:3.4" say?

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

Vizo Allman wrote: > I keep getting this message when I run revdep-rebuild : > "emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy > "sys-devel/gcc:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6" > I have no idea how to begin to troubleshoot this. Any hints? > > TIA > -vizo- > > -- > "Nor aught availed him now > To have build in

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:33:12 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to > > know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those > > packages. > > a friend of mine was fucked by this stuff when he did an emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: > > On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as > >> opposed to the 5 minutes or

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

Vladimir G. Ivanovic schrieb: http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html NOw I got the idea behind the preserve-libs thing. Where are the lists of packages which are in this set saved? Or are they generated on the fly? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digit

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html and http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/06/30/a-few-risks-i-see-related-to-the-new-portage-2-2-preserve-libs-behaviour http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/07/22/the-odyssey-of-preserved-libs-feature Google (for now

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

=== On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: === > on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: > > On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as > >> opposed to th

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: Hi all, revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Hi all, > > revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as > opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! > > I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? > or you are a victim of that new preserved-l

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan McKinnon wrote: | I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? Yes. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiBm2MACgkQZsU

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!

Am Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2008 schrieb ext John covici: > Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also > of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both > of these packages. > > A number of packages seem to depend on libnss3.so.11 libsmime3.so.11 > libs

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!

on Thursday 07/10/2008 Joshua D Doll([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici wrote: > > Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also > > of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both > > of these packages. > > > > A number of packages seem to d

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!

John covici wrote: Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both of these packages. A number of packages seem to depend on libnss3.so.11 libsmime3.so.11 libssl3.so.11 . How can I resolve this conflict

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade packages!

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:33:10 -0400, John covici wrote: > Hi. I just emerged the firefox 3.0 which required a new version also > of xulrunner. Now if I run revdep-rebuild, it wants to downgrade both > of these packages. xulrunner is slotted, so you may need 1.8 and 1.9 installed. Packages built

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps emerging gcc

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > This is a long-standing bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728 Long long Long LONG standing bug. -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surg

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps emerging gcc

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:47:56 -0400, Peter Wood wrote: > Now, whenever I do revdep-rebuild, gcc gets reemerged. Does anybody > have a better idea, than to change my USE flags and reemerge gcc > without the 'gcj' flag set? This is a long-standing bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade firefox from 3 to 2.0.0.14

That's really nice to know. Thank you. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Daniel Pielmeier < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Messerschmitt schrieb: > > Could you elaborate. What is xulrunner exactly? >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade firefox from 3 to 2.0.0.14

Jason Messerschmitt schrieb: Could you elaborate. What is xulrunner exactly? On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:01:27PM -0500, Jason Messerschmitt wrote: Help me stop this from happening please. In my recent troubles with emerge -ev world,

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade firefox from 3 to 2.0.0.14

Could you elaborate. What is xulrunner exactly? On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:01:27PM -0500, Jason Messerschmitt wrote: > > Help me stop this from happening please. > > In my recent troubles with emerge -ev world, I had a similar problem,

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild wants to downgrade firefox from 3 to 2.0.0.14

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:01:27PM -0500, Jason Messerschmitt wrote: > Help me stop this from happening please. In my recent troubles with emerge -ev world, I had a similar problem, which was cured by converting the "firefox" use flag into "xulrunner". -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. _

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

Bob Young wrote: -Original Message- From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds Bob Young wrote: How

RE: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

> -Original Message- > From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs > it finds > Bob Young wrote: >> How do

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

Bob Young skrev: How do I determine if this is a case of "orphaned file, deep dependency, binary package or specially evaluated library" and, if it is one of those, how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...? There are 2 commands: % qfile /path/to/file % equery b /path/to/fil

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs it finds

Bob Young wrote: After a recent emerge -DuN world, messages for one of the packages stated that it was necessary to run revdep-rebuild after emerging the package, so I did. The revdep-rebuild ended up merging six packages, with one of them being gcc. Emerging all six packages took several hours,

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps rebuilding gcc o__o

thanks! I'll try that now and rebuild On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just disable the USE-flag gcj, see > [http://www.nabble.com/forum/PrintPost.jtp?post=14429644]. > -- > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > -- thing.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps rebuilding gcc o__o

Just disable the USE-flag gcj, see [http://www.nabble.com/forum/PrintPost.jtp?post=14429644]. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

Mark Knecht wrote: > Add -pv --tree to the emerge command and look at the hierarchy. > > Probably can do it through equery but I'd have to look up the command > myself so I'll leave that to you. > > Hope this helps, > Mark > > On Jan 27, 2008 12:04 PM, sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I rece

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

sean schrieb: > I recently removed compiz-fusion after playing with it for a while. > I thought I had removed all bits but revdep-rebuild wants to emerge > emerald again. > > How can I best trace what package is trying to pull emerald again? > > Thanks >

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:04:42 -0500 sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently removed compiz-fusion after playing with it for a while. > I thought I had removed all bits but revdep-rebuild wants to emerge > emerald again. > > How can I best trace what package is trying to pull emerald again? >

  1   2   3   >