Am 13.02.2012 16:31, schrieb Grant Edwards:
On 2012-02-13, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 02/13/12 05:49, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I've written a small Python program which outputs the file names in
i-node order. If this is fed into tar or cpio nearly no seeks are
required
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Even if the i-nodes are sequential on-disk, there's no reason to think
that the data blocks associated with the inodes are in any particular
order with respect to the i-nodes themselves.
You could probably find the intended order by using
Hi,
How do i get rid of that?
It takes one minute on boot, that is awful.
PS: How do i deamonize a service on startup? DHCPCD for example?
Thanks in advance!
On 14/02/12 12:48, LK wrote:
Hi,
How do i get rid of that?
It takes one minute on boot, that is awful.
If you boot with acpi=off, does the problem go away? What kernel
version are you using?
PS: How do i deamonize a service on startup? DHCPCD for example?
It has a service. You add it
On 120214, at 13:01, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 14/02/12 12:48, LK wrote:
How do i get rid of that?
It takes one minute on boot, that is awful.
If you boot with acpi=off, does the problem go away? What kernel version
are you using?
No it does not. After the root=/dev/sda5, in grub
On 14/02/12 14:15, LK wrote:
On 120214, at 13:01, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 14/02/12 12:48, LK wrote:
How do i get rid of that?
It takes one minute on boot, that is awful.
If you boot with acpi=off, does the problem go away? What kernel version are
you using?
No it does not. After the
On 13 February 2012 22:11, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
This works because there are two decoupled processes, shared memory
between
them and the fact that star reads names from directories in one big
chunk.
Hi,
I tried to compile hydrogen and it fails with this:
/rootemerge hydrogen
Calculating dependencies... done!
Verifying ebuild manifests
Emerging (1 of 1) media-sound/hydrogen-0.9.5
* hydrogen-0.9.5.tar.gz RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ...
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:49 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I tried to compile hydrogen and it fails with this:
/rootemerge hydrogen
Calculating dependencies... done!
Verifying ebuild manifests
Emerging (1 of 1) media-sound/hydrogen-0.9.5
* hydrogen-0.9.5.tar.gz
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:49 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
How can I circumvent the problem?
I can't vouch for it, but there's a patch attached to the bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372003
Googling around, I get the impression
that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that
correct?
In portage I see grub-static
(GRUB Legacy boot loader)
with version numbers that coincide with
grub (grub2 ?).
If grub2 has replaced grub-1 what (gentoo)
version number did grub2 first take take?
What was the
Am 14.02.2012 10:57, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Even if the i-nodes are sequential on-disk, there's no reason to think
that the data blocks associated with the inodes are in any particular
order with respect to the i-nodes themselves.
You could
Am 14.02.2012 18:36, schrieb james:
Googling around, I get the impression
that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that
correct?
In portage I see grub-static
(GRUB Legacy boot loader)
with version numbers that coincide with
grub (grub2 ?).
If grub2 has replaced grub-1 what (gentoo)
version
Il giorno Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:36:28 + (UTC)
james wirel...@tampabay.rr.com ha scritto:
Googling around, I get the impression
that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that
correct?
In portage I see grub-static
(GRUB Legacy boot loader)
with version numbers that coincide with
grub (grub2 ?).
On 120214, at 18:53, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 14.02.2012 18:36, schrieb james:
Googling around, I get the impression
that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that
correct?
[...]
Because it is still in development hell, it has
not reached version 2.00.
BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo /
On 02/14/2012 01:08 PM, LK wrote:
BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo / maintained by themselves?
Does that matter(it is boot, no network stuff) ?
GRUB Legacy (that is, GRUB versions 0.xx) is still the default in
Gentoo. In order to use GRUB 2 (that is, GRUB version 1.99 in Portage)
On 120214, at 19:24, m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:08 PM, LK wrote:
BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo / maintained by themselves?
Does that matter(it is boot, no network stuff) ?
GRUB Legacy (that is, GRUB versions 0.xx) is still the default in
Gentoo. In order to use
On Feb 14, 2012 1:41 PM, LK linuxrocksrul...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 120214, at 19:24, m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:08 PM, LK wrote:
BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo / maintained by themselves?
Does that matter(it is boot, no network stuff) ?
GRUB Legacy (that is,
On 02/14/2012 01:40 PM, LK wrote:
On 120214, at 19:24, m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:08 PM, LK wrote:
BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo / maintained by themselves?
Does that matter(it is boot, no network stuff) ?
GRUB Legacy (that is, GRUB versions 0.xx) is still the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, m...@trausch.us m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:40 PM, LK wrote:
On 120214, at 19:24, m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:08 PM, LK wrote:
BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo / maintained by themselves?
Does that matter(it is boot, no
PS: If you know how to get rid of any background image, could you
say how?
Remove or comment out any splashimage directives from the config file.
***
Re grub2: as long as grub0 works, I really don't care if grub2 is
better, cleaner, shinier, more modern or anything else.
I don't need a
On 120214, at 20:29, Andrea Conti wrote:
PS: If you know how to get rid of any background image, could you
say how?
Remove or comment out any splashimage directives from the config file.
I meant in GRUB2. I have another box with linux mint using GRUB2, and splash
backgrounds in GRUB /
You can't edit /etc/default/grub to customize how grub-mkconfig generates
grub.cfg. Mint probably has update-grub like Ubuntu does which just allows
you to use that command instead of grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
On Feb 14, 2012 2:55 PM, LK linuxrocksrul...@googlemail.com wrote:
On
LK writes:
On 120214, at 20:29, Andrea Conti wrote:
PS: If you know how to get rid of any background image, could you
say how?
Remove or comment out any splashimage directives from the config
file.
I meant in GRUB2. I have another box with linux mint using GRUB2, and
splash backgrounds
On 02/14/2012 02:04 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
A detailed elaboration would be nice.
A contrasting migration guide, complete with the how's, where's and
why's would be awesome. (Once one's invested in understanding a tool,
a 1-2-3-itsmagic walkthrough is very discomforting.)
While there are
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
- Grant
On 02/14/2012 02:29 PM, Andrea Conti wrote:
Re grub2: as long as grub0 works, I really don't care if grub2 is
better, cleaner, shinier, more modern or anything else.
I don't need a freakin' whole OS to boot linux, and having a
configuration that is so convoluted that it *has to* be generated
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:35 PM, m...@trausch.us m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:04 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
A detailed elaboration would be nice.
A contrasting migration guide, complete with the how's, where's and
why's would be awesome. (Once one's invested in understanding a tool,
a
On 02/14/2012 02:59 PM, Michael Cook wrote:
You can't edit /etc/default/grub to customize how grub-mkconfig
generates grub.cfg. Mint probably has update-grub like Ubuntu does which
just allows you to use that command instead of grub2-mkconfig -o
/boot/grub/grub.cfg
grub-mkconfig
On 02/14/2012 02:53 PM, LK wrote:
I meant in GRUB2. I have another box with linux mint using GRUB2, and
splash backgrounds in GRUB / lowlevel menus or anywhere (branding)
reminds me of commercialism like Apple putting their logo onto every
product. (They are good, tho, the apple logo is
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
I mostly use Chromium. IIRC, there's also Galeon. You'd have to look
at the current state of the
On 02/14/2012 03:41 PM, Grant wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
I've used Chromium in the past. It supports the same plugins that
Firefox does. There is also Epiphany, the GNOME browser,
On 120214, at 21:41, Grant wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
I guess the default XFCE4 browser supports flash. it is lightweight. It came
once with ubuntu xfce and i liked it.
(that to be a
Grant writes:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
Maybe you like www-client/midori:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midori_%28web_browser%29
Wonko
On 120214, at 21:42, m...@trausch.us wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:29 PM, Andrea Conti wrote:
Re grub2: as long as grub0 works, I really don't care if grub2 is
better, cleaner, shinier, more modern or anything else.
I don't need a freakin' whole OS to boot linux, and having a
configuration that
Florian Philipp lists at binarywings.net writes:
sys-boot/grub has two slots. The default slot 0 with version numbers
around 0.92-0.97 is grub-1 (or grub legacy). Slot 2 with version numbers
around 1.99 is grub-2. Because it is still in development hell, it has
not reached version 2.00.
OK,
What do you think of putting this conversation onto some website, as tutorial
or clarification =P ?
On Feb 14, 2012 3:42 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
- Grant
Midori is quite minimal and has flash support last I checked. It's very
lightweight on the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
Chromium/Chrome, Opera, Konqueror... flash works in all of those and
are all fast and minimalistic
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:58 PM, LK linuxrocksrul...@googlemail.com wrote:
What do you think of putting this conversation onto some website, as tutorial
or clarification =P ?
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_ee5c878773ac6ca9f49a33191654e3db.xml
--
:wq
On Feb 14, 2012 4:16 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
Chromium/Chrome,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alecks Gates fuzzylunk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 14, 2012 4:16 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
* Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [14.02.2012. @12:41:25 -0800]:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
- Grant
Hi,
You may want to try Luakit which is light and highly configurable by Lua
scripts. I think
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:57:03 +0100, LK wrote:
I'm not sure how that translates to being more complex. If you are
averse to change, just say so and be done with it. Is it different?
Oh, yes, absolutely. It couldn't be better if it were the same, could
it? ;-)
First, why do we need
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:29:26 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
I don't need a freakin' whole OS to boot linux, and having a
configuration that is so convoluted that it *has to* be generated by
running a set of scripts makes no sense at all.
No it doesn't. so thankfully, outside of your FUD, this is
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [14.02.2012. @12:41:25 -0800]:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
- Grant
Check Vimperator for Firefox, and also uzbl (uzbl-browser or uzbl-tabbed).
Hello,
I would love to use two external displays with my notebook. I have seen
USB graphics cards on the net and was wondering if anyone around here
has tried to run such a thing with Linux. If it worked for you I'd be
interested in as many details as you are willing to share. Thanks in
On 02/14/2012 03:57 PM, LK wrote:
First, why do we need that much code?
First, are you talking about source or binary code?
If you're talking about source code, then realize this: Not all that
source is even compiled on your system.
As to the source that *is* compiled on your system, there
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, m...@trausch.us m...@trausch.us wrote:
It also supports partition schemes other than MBR, which is useful
since I use GPT on my systems.
FYI Gentoo's GRUB 0.9x in portage has supported GPT for at least 2 or
3 years now. I'm using it with GPT partitions and my
On 02/14/2012 06:47 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
FYI Gentoo's GRUB 0.9x in portage has supported GPT for at least 2 or
3 years now. I'm using it with GPT partitions and my systems all boot.
:)
Not all distributions do. I have been running GPT for quite some time,
while I only switched to Gentoo
(Sorry that the threading is broken, I was looking at this in the list
archive and don't still have the mails from earlier, which I probably
mass-deleted...)
This sounds suspiciously like an error loading firmware, which can
happen when you have a video adapter or WiFi adapter that needs
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:47:51PM -0200, Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [14.02.2012. @12:41:25 -0800]:
Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
- Grant
Check
Howdy,
On my older x86 machine, I get this when trying to update:
WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency conflict:
x11-base/xorg-server:0
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.11.2-r2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
conflicts with
x11-base/xorg-server-1.11 required by
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:37:05PM -0600, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
On my older x86 machine, I get this when trying to update:
WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency conflict:
x11-base/xorg-server:0
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.11.2-r2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:37:05 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On my older x86 machine, I get this when trying to update:
WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency
conflict:
x11-base/xorg-server:0
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.11.2-r2::gentoo, ebuild
On 02/14/2012 08:37 PM, Dale wrote:
On my older x86 machine, I get this when trying to update:
WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency conflict:
x11-base/xorg-server:0
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.11.2-r2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
conflicts with
»Q« boxc...@gmx.net [12-02-14 18:12]:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:49 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
How can I circumvent the problem?
I can't vouch for it, but there's a patch attached to the bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372003
Hi,
thank you for your help and the
57 matches
Mail list logo
