On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:18 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:12 PM Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:32 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > I just stumbled on lesspass which seems to be such a tool for
> > > algorithm
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:32 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 04:28:49 +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> > >
> > >> My own solution is actually very simple. I have a "secret algorithm"
> > >> that incorporates several secr
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:00 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:27:32 -0600 Dale wrote:
> > My password manager does that already. The password I was trying to
> > come up with was the master password which I must easily remember, be
> > secure and be easy to type. The other p
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:18 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 04:28:49 +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>
> > My own solution is actually very simple. I have a "secret algorithm"
> > that incorporates several secrets with a predictable way to generate
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:39 AM Jack wrote:
> The problem I have with many of these suggestions is that I have
> multiple devices (two desktops, two laptops, tablet, android phone) I
> use sufficiently often that I either need to be able to remember the
> passwords or have some way of easily access
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:34 PM Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> On 24/09/2018 13:11, R0b0t1 wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> To me it looks like youtubers and some sites trying to make money through
> >> clickbait?
> >>
> >
> > If you had not heard
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Ста Деюс wrote:
> >> Why bash script (the install script), that works in "Debian", does
> >> not
> >> work on "Gentoo" install CD, giving me syntax errors (basically
> >> related to '(', ')' and ''')? In the script is the interpreter line
> >>
> >> #!/bin/bash
>
>
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> It's about one year now since I locked myself in my room for a month and
> installed gentoo :-)
>
A month? Dear lord.
https://www.sudosatirical.com/articles/man-loses-will-to-live-during-gentoo-install/
We shouldn't be recommending such d
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
>
> anything intelligent if I tried. Back in the golden age, for about ten
> years even! my approach to updating my system worked great. Then emerge
> got ornery and stopped letting the necessary, cathartic, inevitable,
> trainwreck take place, w
On Nov 26, 2015 08:30, "lee" wrote:
> waltd...@waltdnes.org writes:
> > compromised with a small / partition, with empty /home, /opt, /var,
> > /usr, and /tmp directories. Their real equivalents are bind-mounted
> > from a much larger partition.
>
> Why don't you just mount the large partition so
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> This properly belongs on the ssh group, but posting there has not gotten
> any responses... and the list is quite slow to boot.
>
> I like using ssh -X to other lan remotes but with new versions of openssh
> or perhaps the configs, it only wo
o by a long shot.
On Wednesday, December 03, 2014 02:39:53 AM Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate
> LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list?
Why do I get the feeling you just want another flamewar?
I don
Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate
LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list?
this mailing list used to be about gentoo.
On Dec 3, 2014 1:38 AM, "James" wrote:
> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
>
> > > is integration of the best of the Cor
On Sep 24, 2014 2:34 AM, "James" wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> PyTimeChart is another wonderful tool that complements
> Ftrace/trace-cmd/KernelShark. [1] The systemd supporters would be keenly
> wise if they added pytimechart to Gentoo, so those (systemd) reticent to
> change, can actually see just how won
On Sep 21, 2014 5:10 PM, "Tom H" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Mark David Dumlao
wrote:
> >
> > Point is he's trying to paint the picture that systemd folks rattle on
and
> > on about its speed, but they don't.
>
> The speed argu
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Mark David Dumlao
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-09-20, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> >> The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded
>>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2014-09-20, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>
> >> The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded
> >> systems which are never going to have the resources needed to run
> >> systemd.
> >
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Mark David Dumlao
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
> volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 18.09.2014 um 01:24 schrieb Mark David Dumlao:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am 18.09.2014 um 01:24 schrieb Mark David Dumlao:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James wrote:
>
>> Mark David Dumlao gmail.com> writes:
>> > You're the o
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I am deluded? Who again posted systemd propaganda again?
>
> Point is he's trying to paint the picture that systemd folks rattle on and
> on about its speed, but they don't.
>
>
> except when they do.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2014-09-18, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> > Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> >> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit.
> >> If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time i
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel
wrote:
>
> On 09/17/2014 10:40 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>
> > Fact is if it's _you_ that seems to give a tweet about systemd speed,
> > so it's on _you_ to measure it, I don't really care what you think
It is, but.
You'll have to get used to running and searching via journalctl instead of
processing the logs directly.
Journal is not persistent across reboots by default, but you can
reconfigure it to be. (just create /var/log/journal)
Last I recall you won't get fine-grained per-daemon space contr
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel
> wrote:
> > Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> >> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit.
> >> If you wanted to measure both, you co
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:11 AM, James wrote:
> Mark David Dumlao gmail.com> writes:
> > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone
> > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that
> > SHOULD be producing anything. That
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am 17.09.2014 um 23:42 schrieb Mark David Dumlao:
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2014 5:36 AM, "James" wrote:
> >
> > Mark David Dumlao gmail.com> writes:
> >
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:46 AM, James wrote:
> Mark David Dumlao gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > > Publish perfomanced metrics; Choice; Unreasonable?
>
> > The classic open source answer to being told to do a lot of
> > work on publicly available data
>
&
On Sep 18, 2014 5:36 AM, "James" wrote:
>
> Mark David Dumlao gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > > Publish perfomanced metrics; Choice; Unreasonable?
> > The classic open source answer to being told to do a lot of
> > work on publicly available data is
>
On Sep 18, 2014 5:19 AM, "James" wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
> > Uh, the only thing the Linux kernel does is spawn a single process as
> > PID 1 and offer a VERY STABLE system call interface for that and
> > future processes to make requests. Nobody is going to break sysvinit
On Sep 18, 2014 2:37 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> Am 17.09.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> > This is highly off-topic, and systemd-related, so if you don't want
> > your breakfast with a healthy amount of flames, skip it.
> >
> > iTWire posted an interview with Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:49 AM, walt wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 09:59 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > I sent this a day or 2 ago, but it doesn't show up on the list for me.
> > Apologies to anyone seeing a duplicate.
> >
> > I'm a total noobie at mtpfs/FUSE. My "excellent adventure" started
> > yes
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:53:51 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>
>> > I'm considering encrypting my home partition one of these days. Given
>> > the things that have come out in recent months, back doors and such,
>> > what is a good program/sof
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 19 Apr 2014 07:43:18 Walter Dnes wrote:
>> I've got another thread going called...
>> "Strange behaviour with LILO on new install on old laptop". Before I
>> file a bug report, I want to check first whether it's my fault. Can
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> The 25/03/14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> > It has already been determined that on this list we do not want extra CCs,
>
> I think you have determined this on your side (I'm not doing a personal
> attack, "you" is not "you" alone).
>
What u
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> On 24.02.2014 18:33, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> Sorry but I think I was quite clear:
>
>>>>> An init daemon generally does one thing well.
> Following a "Unix way" design, Everything else should b
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
>
>
> 24.02.2014 16:39, Mark David Dumlao пишет:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>>
>>>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> 24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> [1] For lack of a better term, let's just call systemd here a "system
>> controller". What is this ONE thing a system controller should do and do
>> it well?
>
>
> An init daemon generally does one
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/02/2014 01:12, Mick wrote:
>> On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:14 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, February 20, 2014 06:34, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:00 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tue, February 18, 2014 18:12, Canek Peláez ValdÃ
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2014-02-20 10:36 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Tanstaafl
>> wrote:
>>> So, please, don't take it as an insult. In fact you have done a very good
>>> job
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2014-02-20 12:43 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tanstaafl
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be cho
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tue, February 18, 2014 10:47, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 18/02/2014 05:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>> I used to use cherokee. Fast, light, awesome, and with a web admin.
>>> The init script always failed me. /e
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 17/02/2014 17:29, Stroller wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 16 February 2014, at 4:41 pm, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Whatever problems Red Hat are trying to solve in the Red Hat space are
>>> problems that do not affect me, so I do not need
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense
> to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what
> is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his system.
Not knowing what g
On Oct 21, 2013 7:01 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-21 6:48 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> Again. This power is overstated and overtrusted. As for "rip it out at
>> its roots" he has no ability to do that, only refuse to merge it in
>>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-10-21 6:11 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> I doubt he actually has the time to read every line of code submitted
>> to the kernel,
>
>
> That isn't what I meant at all...
>
> What he *does* ha
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-10-20 9:14 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> Linus isnt actually actively developing the kernel nowadays. Mostly he
>> just merges commits from his "trusted lieutenants" in charge of various
>> sub
On Oct 20, 2013 10:44 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-20 6:52 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>
>> So they spend a lot of money hiring developers. The more important
>> question is what is their agenda? What do they tell those developers to
>> *make*? You don't hire people without a business pl
https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgroups-redesign
Not sure if I read that just right... but since nobody is doing cgroup
management besides systemd, in practice the cgroups implementation in
Linux wasn't very consistent. So since systemd i
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Steven J. Long
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:37:53PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> initramfs is the new /, for varying values of new since most distros have
>> been doing it that way for well over a decade.
>
> Only it's not, since you're responsible for kee
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Bruce Hill
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:20:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > computer gaming (yawn)...
>>
>>
>> Think again.
>>
>> What is the driving force behind all the super-duper performance
>> hardware you have right now?
>>
>> Gaming.
>>
>> What is
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, pk wrote:
>> On 2013-09-30 00:04, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> It's the general idea that you can leave /usr unmounted until some
>>> random arb time later in the star
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, pk wrote:
> On 2013-09-30 00:04, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> It's the general idea that you can leave /usr unmounted until some
>> random arb time later in the startup sequence and just expect things to
>> work out fine that is broken.
>>
>> It just happened to work
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike) wrote:
>>>> Ohh and BTW, /usr was not just added because someone added a harddrive,
>>>> in most cases it was used to allow machin
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) wrote:
>>> Ohh and BTW, /usr was not just added because someone added a harddrive,
>>> in most cases it was used to allow machines contain a very small system
>>> on / which was enough to just boot and mount a networked syst
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Dan Johansson wrote:
> On 29.09.2013 20:25, Dale wrote:
>> Simple, I have never had to resize / or /boot before. I have had to
>> resize /usr, /var and /home several times tho. THAT is the reason. For
>> me, it doesn't matter if it is rational to YOU or not. I
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:24 PM, pk wrote:
> On 2013-09-30 04:05, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> are the same. Distro packagers, however, have to decide for 100% of the
>> cases.
>> So they're going to end up making weird decisions that are easy for you to
>> sec
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2013 9:31 AM, "Daniel Campbell" wrote:
>>
>
> --- le snip ---
>
>> If the proposed solution is all binaries and libraries in the same
>> root/prefix directory, then why call it /usr?
>
> My question exactly.
>
> Why install to /
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:00:06AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
>> > * Separate /usr worked fine for AGES, until... Do you see a pattern
>> > developing here?
>> >
>> seperate /usr has stopped working fine AGES AGO. Just some setups
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 09/29/2013 09:05 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> Anyway, I'm not in favor of FHS _per se_, but it sounds pretty
>>> reasonable to have som
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 09/29/2013 08:51 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> It's fairly obvious (to me, anyway) that anything mounting a filesystem
>>> and making it ava
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> Anyway, I'm not in favor of FHS _per se_, but it sounds pretty
> reasonable to have some semblance of order among where different parts
> of a system go. Shoving everything into /usr and symlinking everything
> else seems like a stop-gap or
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> It's fairly obvious (to me, anyway) that anything mounting a filesystem
> and making it available is system-critical. I run samba and don't need
> it for boot, but like you said, someone may need that. I wouldn't see a
> problem with smbmou
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> I'm not affected by anything regarding the /usr switch, but I'd like
> to have a good talk with the first person who decided a
> system-critical binary belonged in /usr instead of /bin or /sbin.
> They've created a mess for every distro and
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> I'm not affected by anything regarding the /usr switch, but I'd like
> to have a good talk with the first person who decided a
> system-critical binary belonged in /usr instead of /bin or /sbin.
> They've created a mess for every distro and
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Dale wrote:
> Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> One thing that you seem to be missing here. Before Gentoo, I used Mandrake.
>>> It had a init thingy. It caused me much grief and is one rea
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Dale wrote:
> One thing that you seem to be missing here. Before Gentoo, I used Mandrake.
> It had a init thingy. It caused me much grief and is one reason I left
> Mandrake. I also didn't like the upgrade process either but one reason I
> chose Gentoo is no ini
On Sep 13, 2013 9:53 PM, "Yuri K. Shatroff" wrote:
>
> On 13.09.2013 17:43, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13.09.2013 10:24, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
>>> [ ... ]
>>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> On 13.09.2013 10:24, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
>>
>> This one should work:
>>
>> find /home/joseph/ -iname "*.pdf" -exec ls -l --sort=time {} +
>
>
> -exec is not suitable here because it spawns a `ls` process per each found
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>
>> > > > the disk... OOPS. This is a classic "chicken and egg" situation.
>> > >
>> > > On Solaris no problem with loadable modules - everything is
>>
On Sep 2, 2013 5:21 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 09:49:23AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote
> > Walter Dnes wrote:
> >
> > > You can get away with most stuff as modules; ***BUT NOT THE ROOT
> > > FILESYSTEM***. Think about it for a minute. Gentoo reads modules off
> > > t
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> I usally use ext4 as filesystem.
>>
>> # lsmod|grep ext
>> ext3 100768 0
>> jbd39586 1 ext3
>> ext2 49572 0
>> ext4 263621 1
>> crc16 1255 2 ext4,bl
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:19:56PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote
>
>> So there seems to be no real need to create a static linux kernel
>> with ZFS inside.
>
> See
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?full=1#book_part1_chap
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-31 1:10 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like an awful lot of trouble for a "problem" that's already solved
>> by
>> installing sys-kernel/module-rebuild and running "modul
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Friday 30 Aug 2013 15:44:35 Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 2013-08-30 10:34 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> >> Why would there be a problem if someone decided to create a 3rd party
>> >> overlay *not* part of the off
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:54 PM, wrote:
> Hi Mark, hi William,
>
> the script ds3231 in /etc/init.d is -- according to rc-update --
> set as folows:
>
>ds3231 | boot
Long and short of it, here's the boot order:
sysinit -> boot -> (single) -> default
rc(8) tells me that sysinit
Which runlevel did you put your script on?
You probably want it on sysinit, rather than default.
Also, you can put rc_before= and rc_after= in the corresponding
/etc/conf.d/ file and make sure it runs before your syslog but after
your sysfs.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:04 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Th
On Aug 22, 2013 1:28 PM, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> Correct, and here lies the cause for the "out of sync" scenario.
>
> > So the only "out of sync" scenario that should matter is with the
> > kernel or kernel modules. Even if it were out of sync with your
> > current toolset it should still be able
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-20 2:54 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>> Unless you want to learn the ins and outs of using an initramfs (and
>> having a lot of fun and failed boots in the process), I highly
>> recommend using Dracut. It does everything for you.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 12:52 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, pk wrote:
>>> On 2013-08-18 23:08, Mick wrote:
>>>
>>>> I honestly cannot understand why we/Gentoo are allow
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, pk wrote:
> On 2013-08-18 23:08, Mick wrote:
>
>> I honestly cannot understand why we/Gentoo are allowing the RHL
>> monolithic development philosophy to break what we have. Is
>> Poettering the only developer available to the Linux world? Are
>> RHL dictating wh
walt, are you using pam_systemd? I have a hunch that systemd-logind
should still work.
The proper way to figure out what failed to start and why is to use systemctl
# list of running services
systemctl
# status of particular service
systemctl status name-of-service
Now if your concern is the service loading order, then you're really
talking about problems in your unit files, i.e.,
systemd.unit (5)
systemd.service (5)
On Jul 28, 2013 6:26 AM, wrote:
> walt wrote:
>
> > On 07/26/2013 06:39 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> > > must I check that every entry previously in /etc/init.d now has an
> entry
> > > in /usr/lib/systemd/system? What do I do if there is no corresponding
>
Thanks for the FUD.
On Jul 22, 2013 11:15 PM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security? bah, not needed.
Funny.
Thank you for the FUD. I was beginning to miss M$.
Heres the freedesktop entry for a more authoritative statement.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
On Jul 23, 2013 4:57 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> maybe you should not just believe everything posted. Especially from
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind ebuild
(wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally intended.
But yeah you usually stay away from unmaintained upstreams.
On Jul 22, 2013 11:03 PM, "Canek Peláez Valdés" wrote:
>
> ConsoleKit is for all practical
Btw, rather than directly opening a terminal window, you may want to
use the notify-send api / command line to do your popup. That way it
gets rendered natively by your desktop of choice, and you don't have
to fuss about searching which DISPLAY variable X is running on.
You can do something like
n
My primary suspect is my pam / systemd setup.
If I am on X, and I ctrl+alt+f1, I switch to a terminal. ps aux shows
that all my programs are still running. However, if I alt+f7 back, the
X server immediately dies and I get sent back to my login prompt.
Clearly I'm missing something important. Any
TLDR: because systemd replaces consolekit with logind,
programs that depend on consolekit to determine which "session"
they're in may fail to do so unless they are also built with systemd
support and the relevant pam session lines are enabled. This causes
several silent failures and may prevent you
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
> [...]
>> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
>> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like it. :/
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>
> He
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> 'evening, Mark.
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:41:01PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
>> > In the end, I humbly believe it's up to me to ju
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> Thanks, it really doesn't look like forcing.
> On the higher level, there must be some politics going on; that's also not
> forcing, but politics. On the lower level (that of users) one's always got
> the worst case to demonstrate there's
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> If GNOME has to support PA and non-pa systems, they need to code,
>> test, support and bug-fix 2 different sets of of systems. If they need
>> to support ConsoleKit and logind, the number grows to 4 (PA/ck,
>> PA/logind, non-PA/ck, non-PA/l
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> In the end, I humbly believe it's up to me to judge what effect there is for
> me on my computers.
Yes, that's exactly the point. Scroll up and reread this thread,
though, and you'll get the impression that some complainers seem to
think
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 04/20/2013 05:34 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>> If you need it, PA can be great. Not everyone needs or wants it, many
>>> people are quite content to just carry on
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> And you are vastly overstating the desirability of having pulseaudio
> enforced on users without very good cause
How much barefaced lying can you do in one sentence?
1) it's not enforced _on you_. USE=-pulse
2) bluetooth headset goes in, audi
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:48:07PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote
>> Analogy:
>> 99% of people aren't going to need a11y. But the whole point of
>> installing it by default on most desktop systems is that you can
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> On 25.04.2013 19:48, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Walter Dnes
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you've hit the nail on the head. Complex setups require
>>>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Can't get to see dmesg, the system locked up tight.
>
> I can create an ext4 fs on a different partition, and since the 'disk' is
> actually a RAID array, if the array is going south, I should see the same
> problem with ext4, right?
I am gu
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
