Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that "optimized" stuff I
wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here after upgrading glibc?
Stefan
Andrew Hall wrote:
> Where to from here? Surely there is an easier way to tell gentoo that I
> don't want the latest version of glib, I want an older one on install.
> We can't use the latest (2.3.4) glibc because we have an embedded
> application that relies on 2.3.2 librar
Andrey Falko wrote:
> Have you done an update to this system where glibc might have been upgraded
> but not gcc or vice versa? Have you updated any system packages in general
> on the system? As was mentioned earlier an emerge -e system might solve the
> problem. If not, then we'
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:05:09 +0100
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
> in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
>
> Do you guys do a "emerge -e system", ie. recompile e
Am Donnerstag 12 Juni 2008 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the best way to finally solve this would be to
>
> quickpkg glibc-2.3.4 (just in case...)
> emerge -C glib-2.3.4
you mean to unmerge glibc-2.3.4?
When I do this my system is no longer useable. emerge wouldn´t wo
On 22/04/12 20:52, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that "optimized" stuff I
wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here after upgra
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
> Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
> krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
> versions of such "far reaching" stuff as glibc on a single machine
> first
ity between the Arch kernel and the
> version of glibc in the chroot.
>
Well, the kernel in Arch is 3.4.4 and glibc is 2.15. In the chroot, the glibc
is 2.14. Maybe I should update system et al. But then emerge system
asks for m4 (but not for glibc, which I find surprising).
Thanks,
J.
I've lost most of them locales after upgrade to glibc-2.3.6-r4.
You'll need to create a /etc/locale.gen file. After that, read
man 5 locale.gen
man 8 locale-gen
and run /usr/sbin/locale-gen
Yep. Thanks. Easy enough.
I've seen something of the sort in glibc-2
On 06/06/12 13:37, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 06.06.2012 12:25, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I wish to build a binary package of glibc-2.14.1-r3. I don't want to
actually install it on my system. Just build a tbz2 for it to use on
another system. Is there a way to do that? Portage a
Mick wrote:
> I got this message in elog:
>
> * Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
>
> * Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
> * To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
> * and remerge glibc. See:
> *
On 02/02/2018 01:07 PM, Floyd Anderson wrote:
> Hi Helmut,
>
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:34:23 +0100
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> With glibc-2.27 installed I cannot compile anything, since most
>> packages try to include
>> which doesn't exit any more.
>
On Mon, Feb 07 2011, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 13:34:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
>> After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
>> desktop
those services.
But now, there's agetty left, and I don't know how to restart this
service (without reboot):
[...]
agetty 3438root DEL REG8,4
30199325219
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r4/image/lib64/libnss_files-2.23.so
(virtual memory hits 400G in 1 second, and continues to
> > climb).
> >
> > I suspect the problem is that RHEL v4 uses =sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4,
> > whereas we have =sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 installed.
> >
> > I have three questions:
> > 1. Am I posting to the r
Seems logical but man emerge and man
> > portage don't seem to mention this variable.
>
> man make.conf mentions it, as does /etc/make.conf.example
>
Great. Thanks. Looks like I'll have to give it a try. Even turning on
userlocales it still failed on to build for device
probably be able to test out the theory that
> > this would fix my broken system.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jeff
>
> Perhaps you should go back to a lower glib version. Latest versions of
> such important packages might always have issues.
What is the approved way t
"James Ausmus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> OK, what does the output of gcc-config -l (ell) show you - what
> version of gcc is currently being used? Did gcc get updated prior to
> the glibc update attempt? If so, was env-update && source /etc/profil
r/bin/python') and doing a egrep for
>
> (__libc_init)|(GLIBC_([0-9.]+))|(libc(_\w+)?\.so(?:\.(\d[0-9.]*))?)
>
> Then it finds the matches and tries to apply some "logic" to decide the
> best answer. On my system it's "GLIBC_2.0" and so platform
x-gnu/3.4.4/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../../lib64/crtn.o -march=k8 -mfpmath=sse -msse3 -o .libs/libcxcore.so.0.9.7 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../../lib64/crti.o: In function `_init': /var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.5-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:49:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> hehe, I'm safe :-)
>
> I've hardmasked >=glibc-2.12 ever since the blatantly untested cock up
> that was the first testing version of glibc-2.12 hit the tree
Now if only you could mask your smugness plugin :P
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 18:49 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After a successful upgrade from profile 2006.1 to 2007.0, I decided to
> unmerge some unused packages from world and accidentally had glibc on
> the emerge command line from a cut and paste operation.
Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> But here's the weird thing, I had compiled glibc-2.4-r1
> with userlocales USE flag, in my /etc/locales.build
There *is* no file called /etc/locales.build. glibc-2.4-r2
uses /etc/locale.gen to determine, which locales are to be
generated.
> But with 2.4-r2 th
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:45:31 -0700, darren kirby wrote:
> Isn't locales.build supposed to get glibc to _not_ build any other
> locales?
Only if you emerge glibc with the userlocales USE flag.
--
Neil Bothwick
Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill.
pgpeAC
h-bdeps=y doesn't seem to identify anything new to
> emerge. I don't see how it could if I don't see virtual/glibc in
> portage:
>
> gandalf ~ # emerge --with-bdeps=y -pvDNu world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world depe
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:34:59 -0800, walt wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
> >> krept onto my first m
I just wonder why this path is not included in the "/etc/ld.so.conf" ? yes, my system is running on a intel x86.[huangfei @ /lib/tls] % equery belongs /lib/tls/libpthread*
[ Searching for file(s) /lib/tls/libpthread-2.3.6.so,/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 in *... ]sys-libs/glibc-2.3.6-r3 (/lib/
On 03/02/18 16:08, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
It is perfectly fine to downgrade glibc if you didn't emerge anything
that compiled binaries.
If you did, you can still downgrade, but then you need to rebuild the
packages that you emerged since the glibc upgrade. qlop is your f
...]
> agetty 3438root DEL REG8,4
> 30199325219 /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r4/image/lib64/
> libnss_files-2.23.so
> agetty 3438root DEL REG8,4
> 30199325229 /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.2
I have glibc-2.12.1 running on two ~x86 systems with no problems so far.
> Hi,
>
> Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
>
> I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1, and
> downgrading that package is decidedly non-trivial. Only com
Am Freitag, 14. September 2012, 20:48:23 schrieb Mick:
> I got this message in elog:
>
> * Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
>
> * Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
> * To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 14/09/12 22:48, Mick wrote:
>>
>> I got this message in elog:
>>
>> * Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
>>
>> * Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
>&
On 01/16/13 06:31, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 13 January 2013, at 06:53, Andrew Lowe wrote:
...
From all of the above, I think the important part is that I need to
install some "glibc developement files". A google search doesn't point me
in
the direction of what these migh
Grant schreef:
>>>I noticed my glibc and gcc were updated to 2.3.5 in my last big emerge
>>>world. Should I run an emptytree emerge now?
>>>
>>>- Grant
>>
>>first, your gcc got not updated to 2.3.5
>>
>>second: no.
>>You do NOT
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 02:11, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> Jerry McBride wrote:
> > Anyone here running a ~x86 box and have the latest glibc and a 4.0.3 gcc
> > running on it?
>
> I used to run gcc-4.0.3 and latest glibc (don't remember the version
> number) some time ago..
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 20:16 +0100, Jarry wrote:
> Jarry wrote:
>
> > I changed my USE flags (added "hardened hardenedphp lm_sensors)
> > and tried "emerge --update --deep --newuse world". Emerge wanted
> > to recompile 8 packages, but crushed during the s
Glenn Enright wrote:
Bugger. was afraid of that. Ive been running gcc3.4 for a while which needs
some ~x86 stuff (glibc). Umm... static doesnt change.
Strace on gzip isnt very interesting, gunzip gives me a stat64 file error
towards the end...
My system is mostly ~x86 stuff and I&#x
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:39:15 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
> > That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others.
> > Fortunately, nothing was lost, it just stayed in the queue while I
> > recompiled glibc.
>
> Same here, but are you saying you fixed t
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then,
> I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because
> the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8:
I had similar problems,
Corbin Bird wrote:
> Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure?
>> *** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when
>> *** building glibc. Please change the environment variable
>> *** and run configure again.
> Same error regardl
On 2019-03-29, Philip Webb wrote:
> 190329 Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> gcc-7.3.9-r3 is marked stable, yet it fails to build if you have the
>> current stable version of glibc installed (2.28-r5).
>
> I've been using Gcc-8.2.0-r6 since 170302 with Glibc-2.27-r6 : no pro
On Wednesday, 30 March 2022 09:38:41 BST Nikolay Kichukov (oldumnet) wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 00:50 -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> > Anyone else seeing a multitude of segv in libc on a stable box with
> > =sys-libs/glibc-2.34-r10?
> >
> >
nothing to update, python-updater ran fine, as did revdep-rebuild.
>>> However when I rebooted I see messages when starting udev:
>>>
>>> inotify_init failed: fnction not implemented...
>>
>> inotify_init is provided by glibc, so that seems to be important. That
>
On 18/03/09 Alan McKinnon said:
> Well, this is gentoo and we don't need no stinking Changelogs on gentoo :-)
:)
> Seriously, you are running a stable arch. All known issues should be resolved
> by the time glibc hits stable. You can always askhere, or look at b.g.o for
>
below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] glibc # /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library 20041102 release version 2.3.4, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
On 9/1/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Grant gmail.com> writes:
> > If anyone can help me I'm desperate to save this system and not have
> > to reinstall.
Well, I have lost xwindows/kde on (2) systems because of an upgrade of
make.profile to point to
I did it once, some years ago. AFAIR I commented out the version che k in, i
think, the glibc-toolchain eclass then emerged the older version. Just make
sire you have a binary package of the current version that you can unpack in /
if things go wrong.
On 22 August 2017 13:53:35 EEST, Dale
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2021, 13:57:37 EET schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> > > That's what I did: I found a 2017 stage3 with a still older glibc and
> > > managed to upgrade to a 2020 gentoo while masking the last glibc
> > > versions. That was tricky because I
Yes, looks like it is:
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201602-02
--
0x7D964D3361142ACF
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:48, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/glibc-Dramatische-Sicherheitsluecke-in-Linux-Netzwerkfunktionen-
est -vanilla"
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.11.2 [2.6.1] USE="nls -debug -gd
> -glibc-omitfp (-hardened) (-multilib) -profile (-selinux) -vanilla"
> 15,994 kB
> [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r2 [4.1.2] USE="fortran mudflap
> nls nptl (-altivec) -boo
nderstand your question, but AFAIK the only reason to
> > re-compile any package is if the libraries it links to have changed, no?
> >
> > AFAICS gcc links only to libraries installed by glibc. therefore in the
> > case of recompiling gcc itself, it should need/use only the
ly to libraries installed by glibc. therefore in the
case of recompiling gcc itself, it should need/use only the headers
installed by glibc.
(And the only reason to re-compile an existing glibc is if the linux
kernel headers change. I always re-compile glibc when the linux kernel
headers change, but I
> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then,
> I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because
> the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8:
.UTF-8 changed from .utf8?
That's not true. My glibc 2.3.6 (with use
I have:
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0
Portage 2.1 (default-linux/amd64/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/amd64-vanilla,
glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.16 x86_64)
=
System uname: 2.6.16 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor
4400+
Notice my profile i
On 03/02/18 07:54, Dale wrote:
While on this topic, I have a question about glibc. I have it set in
make.conf to save the binary packages. Generally I use it when I need
to go back shortly after a upgrade, usually Firefox or something.
However, this package is different since going back a
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:53:57 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
1445464761: >>> unmerge success: sys-libs/glibc-2.20-r2
1445464768: === (1 of 13) Post-Build Cleaning
(sys-libs/glibc-2.21-r1::/var/cache/portage/tree/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.21-r1.ebuild)
1
t;
> lsof | grep -w DEL | grep portage
>
> and /etc/init.d/XXX restart for those services.
>
> But now, there's agetty left, and I don't know how to restart this
> service (without reboot):
>
> [...]
> agetty 3438root DEL REG
Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
>> I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an ~amd64
>> system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced
>> in
>> glibc-2.24 and still present in
Yes, I have read this in
/var/portage/sys-libs/glibc/files/eblits/pkg_setup.eblit
and I understand the risks.
if has_version '>'${CATEGORY}/${PF} ; then
eerror "Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:"
eerror " Downgrading glibc is not supported a
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> wrote:
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > > Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
> > >
>
Am Montag, 23. April 2012, 06:31:31 schrieb Graham Murray:
> kwk...@hkbn.net writes:
> > Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
> > packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
> > other packages that uses dlopen().
>
On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which
> prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of
> message:
>
> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
> /li
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> My bet is that it's an incompatibility between the Arch kernel and the
>> version of gli
Erik wrote:
>Hello,
>now I tried again to emerge the new version of glibc, but it failed
>again. After the emerge (and even after rebooting), some important
>programs, such as login and python no longer work. They cause
>segmentation fault. To boot the system I had to add init=/b
;>
>>Segmentation fault.
>>
>>
>
>I've seen this before:
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/114627
>
>
Interesting, thanks!
>Did you seem a similer error at the end of emerging glibc?
>
>
I do not remember, but I think the las
--- CJ Keist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes,
> Running Matlab on current release will just core
> dump. Also tried
> the fix on Matlab site where you modify the .matlab7rc.sh
> file. So I'm
> thinking it has to be a problem with the new glibc on
> c
On 01/10/2018 12:22 PM, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> Corbin Bird wrote:
>> Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure?
>>> *** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when
>>> *** building glibc. Please change the environment variable
Hi Helmut,
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:34:23 +0100
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
With glibc-2.27 installed I cannot compile anything, since most
packages try to include
which doesn't exit any more.
And downgrading glibc using a binary package doesn't work.
It looks like I have to restore my s
> > That's what I did: I found a 2017 stage3 with a still older glibc and
> > managed to upgrade to a 2020 gentoo while masking the last glibc
> > versions. That was tricky because I had to git-checkout intermediate
> > versions of the portage tree in order to deal wi
> > That's what I did: I found a 2017 stage3 with a still older glibc and
> > managed to upgrade to a 2020 gentoo while masking the last glibc
> > versions. That was tricky because I had to git-checkout intermediate
> > versions of the portage tree in order to deal wi
> You can also set the "nptlonly" flag for glibc, which will avoid using
> linuxthreads at all (forces everything to use nptl).
If you look at the OP's message, it appeared that he did have the nptlonly
flag set... There is the message about glibc/gcc masking off some us
> * Select the new profile with eselect
> * Re-emerge, in this sequence, gcc, binutils, and glibc
> emerge -1 sys-devel/gcc:6.4.0
> emerge -1 sys-devel/binutils
> emerge -1 sys-libs/glibc
> * Rebuild your entire system
> emerge -e @world
>
Would emerge -e
Nikos Chantziaras skrev:
> On 09/06/2009 11:22 AM, Erik wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras skrev:
>>> On 09/06/2009 09:43 AM, Erik wrote:
>>>> I have emerged glibc with "debug -glibc-omitfp" and restarted the
>>>> system. But when I execute "valgri
Hello,
Looking at what I'm about to pick up via emerge, I notice this
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1 [2.6.1]
This immediately sets off alarm bells for me, since glibc is the basis of the
whole system. If I pick this up do I have to rebuild everything?
I've also
You are right it´s not a real solution. Only a solution to get back the old
(and working) system with two installed versions of glibc in package
database.
thanks
Am Donnerstag 12 Juni 2008 schrieb Dimitrios Ropokis:
> This is not a real solution,
> a problem has to be solved with tool
t; > > still fails. That one had me scratching my head for a few minutes.
> >
> > what happens if you remove the entry in /var/db?
> > From gentoo's point of view, glibc suddenly is not installed. You are
> > free to choose a version.
>
> That's a
On 14/09/12 23:44, Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 14/09/12 22:48, Mick wrote:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this
is too. I believe its the permissions being changed by/for PAM.
> > Check to make sure you are in the video group. Add your user to it if
> > you're not. That fixed it for me.
>
> Well, it seems to be fixed by downgrading glibc back to 2.3.4-20041102.
> I'm not sure i
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r3/work/gcc-7.3.0/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc:157:10:
> > fatal error: sys/ustat.h: No such file or directory
> > #include
> >
> > So maybe rebuild glibc or something?
>
> Is the file the
I doubt this is a memory problem. I've just had the same problem with
glibc-2.17 and python. I manually went back to glibc-2.16 and everything is
fine again. I then tried re-emerging all the python versions with glibc-2.16
installed and then re-emerged glibc-2.17 and had the same problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What's wrong with "tar xf glibc-2.6.1.tbz2 -C /mnt/gentoo"? It's
worked
> for me in the past when I "upgraded" to a broken glibc.
>
I was not sure what would
On Dienstag 17 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Yes, I have read this in
> /var/portage/sys-libs/glibc/files/eblits/pkg_setup.eblit
> and I understand the risks.
>
> if has_version '>'${CATEGORY}/${PF} ; then
> eerror "Sanity check to keep you fr
exactly what is going on is to run emerge
> with the -t option and see from that what is pulling a package in.
I've run "emerge -tevp" (or similar) on the packages "equery depends
=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4" reports. All of sys related ebuilds among others show
a dependency
On Sunday 11 February 2007, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after syncing portage yesterday, an update for glibc from 2.4-r4 to
> 2.5 is shown. Is there anything special to do after this update? Last
> time glibc was updated you had to rebuild world, if I remember
> corr
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible.
>
> This is repeatable for me.
>
> * The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named
> * 'glibc-2.14.1
On 03/09/2011 05:27 PM, Andrew Wilkinson wrote:
I have a VM image based on the amd64 hardened no-multilib profile. Today, when
trying to emerge glibc-2.11.3 and gcc-4.4.5, the builds have been failing, and
appear to be trying to build multilib versions, which of course it can't. Any
On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
versions of such "far reaching" stuff as gl
110210 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> glibc is problematic, it's tentacles run very deep in any GNU system,
> it has a less than stellar history in terms of breaking gentoo systems,
> mostly due to inadequate testing before releasing to ~arch.
> it's v difficult to downgrade it d
x27;s an incompatibility between the Arch kernel and the
>>> version of glibc in the chroot.
>>>
>> Well, the kernel in Arch is 3.4.4 and glibc is 2.15. In the chroot, the glibc
>> is 2.14. Maybe I should update system et al. But then emerge system
>> asks for m4
On 13 January 2013, at 06:53, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> ...
> From all of the above, I think the important part is that I need to
> install some "glibc developement files". A google search doesn't point me in
> the direction of what these might be. According t
Richard Fish wrote:
>Erik wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hello,
>>now I tried again to emerge the new version of glibc, but it failed
>>again. After the emerge (and even after rebooting), some important
>>programs, such as login and python no longer work. They cause
>&g
> > library, but after the upgrade of glibc it shows up in /usr/lib. The
> > only solution I could make up was to move everything from /usr/lib
> > to /usr/lib64, symlink /usr/lib -> /usr/lib64 and then start emerging
>
> Actually seems like bug #133547, in which case
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:57:32PM -0500, Dale wrote
> Howdy,
>
> I recently did a upgrade which included glibc. Now both Firefox and
> Seamonkey has problems starting. I have several profiles and some work
> and some don't. Using safe-mode works which makes m
Am 09.01.2014 08:07, schrieb Mick:
> If dev-lang/python:2.7 does not allow you to emerge glibc then use
> eselect to switch --python2 to an older python available in that
> box and try emerging glibc with that. You may have to repeat this
> until successful (hopefully) with dev-lan
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:52:05 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> My GLIBC situation is as follows, as you know GLIBC cannot be downgraded
> once upgraded.
It can, at your own risk. Read the ebuild to see how.
> * sys-libs/glibc
> Latest version available: 2.33
> Latest ve
ing some modules.
>>> My desktop and my laptop, however, compiled it without problems.
>>>
>>> I haven't had the time to check it, but it seems weird.
>>
>> Replacing with a binpackage from packages.gentooexperimental.org got
>> bash working. Now I'm
a way to downgrade for the brave.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > quickpkg glibc
> > > > move the 2.11.? version ebuild you want to your local overlay.
> > > > Edit it and find the check that disallows downgrades. Comment
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
>
> When I read the NEWS section there with all that "optimized" stuff I
> wonder if it makes a
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
> > would keep popping out. As far as I understand, if I upgrade
> > linux-headers I must also recompile glibc. And then, anything else?
>
> Nope. (Almost) everything else is dynamically linked to glibc, so
> they will automatically
; > So the question is simple; does Gentoo deal with this problem in any way?
>
> Maybe I misunderstand your question, but AFAIK the only reason to
> re-compile any package is if the libraries it links to have changed, no?
>
> AFAICS gcc links only to libraries installed by gl
301 - 400 of 2516 matches
Mail list logo
