I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line.
It&#
s
The screen said to attach the file
/var/tmp/portage/sandbox-1.2.17/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/config.log
to any bug reports. It's not that large so I thought I'd post it here
and see if I can get any faster answers as to what's gone wrong. To me
it looks like it'
> >
> > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > -------
> > LOG FILE =
> > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
> >
> > access_wr: /
> > -
/sandbox-1.2.17/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/config.log
to any bug reports. It's not that large so I thought I'd post it here
and see if I can get any faster answers as to what's gone wrong. To me
it looks like it's gone a bit strange about choosing the C compiler at
thi
ror when the compilation is
> > >
> > > finished:
> > > >>> Source compiled.
> > >
> > > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > > ---
> > > LOG
Hello,
Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common "C
compiler cannot create executables" error. Of course I
tried "FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox" but that failed
On Thursday 06 November 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
> I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common "C
> compiler cannot create executables" error.
Selon Dale :
> I would try it with sandbox disabled.
>
> FEATURES="-*sandbox*"
>
> It may work. Certainly worth a shot I guess.
>
Bingo! For some reason, FEATURES="-*sandbox*" emerge nss did'nt work (sandbox
still used) when replacing FEATURE=".
On Friday 18 January 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have sys-apps/sandbox-1.2.20_alpha2-r1 installed but still
> > when I install a kernel module I need to disable the sandbox by using
> > FEATURES
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Selon Dale:
I would try it with sandbox disabled.
FEATURES="-*sandbox*"
It may work. Certainly worth a shot I guess.
Bingo! For some reason, FEATURES="-*sandbox*" emerge nss did'nt work (sandbox
still used) when replacin
Same result with the version of sandbox you make use of it!
Tamer
Am 19.06.2013 10:13, schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>
> That's strange, since I've just re-emerged the same version of PyCrypto
> here.
> One difference might be the version of sys-apps/sandbox
>
> On my &
> >
> > # emerge -pv portage
> > !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
> >
> > !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
>
> Start by fixing your sandbox.
>
> [...]
> > [blocks B ] > app-admin/python-updater-0.2)
> [...]
> &g
nf '--disable-gtk-doc'
'--with-libjpeg' '--with-libjasper' '--with-libtiff'
'--disable-introspection' '--with-x11' '--with-libpng'
* ebuild.sh, line 557: Called die
* The specific snippet of cod
To clarify, when I try to run emerge -eav system, the first package which
fails is sandbox.
It advises me to try
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox
in response to the cannot run C compiled programs, but I still get the same
error. My research on the web points me back towards gcc not being
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
No, that's not it. It's this:
!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.4/work/build-default/config.log
Hmmm. Thought it was the same. Here goes but it is lengthy:
root@smoker / # cat
/var/t
Hallo ,
please help me. I try to install a new Gentoo with no-multilib (AMD64) ,
but compiling sandbox fails :
ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12
Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-apps/sa
Hi,
I have sys-apps/sandbox-1.2.20_alpha2-r1 installed but still
when I install a kernel module I need to disable the sandbox by using
FEATURES='-sandbox'
I am running kernel 2.6.23-gentoo-r3 and gcc-4.2.2 as standard
C-compiler.
Am I missing something or is the bug not fixed,
Ian K wrote:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE =
"/tmp/sandbox-media-video_-_f4l-0.2-25033.log"
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/
ed:
> > >>> Source compiled.
> >
> > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > -------
> > LOG FILE =
"/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log"
> >
> > access_wr: /
> >
--
On Mon 13 Aug 2012 05:37:27 PM IST, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan
mailto:cont...@nileshgr.com>> wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan"
mailto:cont...@nileshgr.com>> wrote:
>
> What's the dis
gg wrote:
> Hallo ,
>
> please help me. I try to install a new Gentoo with no-multilib (AMD64) ,
>
> but compiling sandbox fails :
>
>
> ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12
>
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>>> Verifying ebuild
ABCD writes:
>> Is it related to hal daemon problem?
>> emerge -vuD glibc
>> [...]
>>usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a
>>>>> Completed installing glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 into
>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/image/
>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan"
> wrote:
> >
> > What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
> directly with userpriv?
>
> *advantage
>
If you do thin
--- Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Ruskin
> wrote:
> > These sandbox violations happen all too
> frequently. You should
> > raise a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org. For
> the time being,
> >
On Friday 09 November 2007 21:55:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [ ok ] ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd
> ...
> ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> --- LOG FILE =
> "/var/
I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
out of its crib.
I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored
the posts.
`sandbox' doesn't like my root .bash_hist
I had use the config file as
[global]
workgroup = ENG
netbios name = thewho
security = user
[mp3]
path = /home/mp3
read only = yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
public = yes
guest only = yes
[sandbox]
path
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 08:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>
> --- Jules Colding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Ruskin
> > wrote:
> > > These sandbox violations happen all too
> > frequently. You should
> >
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote:
> Hi!
> I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
>
> finished:
> >>> Source compiled.
>
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> -----
Hi,
> I'm trying to emerge mythtv but keep running into a problem with sandbox.
>
> Whenever I try to emerge, the compiling seems to work fine, but the
> installation fails and I get several 'Access Violations'. It seems that
> instead of installing into
> Unable to unshare: EINVAL (for FEATURES="ipc-sandbox network-sandbox
> pid-sandbox")
Is the CONFIG_UTS_NS kernel option enabled?
See the following forums threads for details:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-260.html
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1094424
Rumen Yotov a écrit :
>
> Hi,
> Try disabling the "sandbox" FEATURE in /etc/make.conf.
> Run: 'FEATURE="-sandbox" emerge www-client/opera -a'
> Never used 'opera' so can't say more.
> HTH.Rumen
Hi,
Disabling sandbox is probably a bad idea.
Bug #134368
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 20 August 2005 16:08, Zac Medico wrote:
> Ian K wrote:
> > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > ---
> > LOG FILE =
> > "/tmp/sandbox-media-video_-_f4l-0.2-25033.log"
> >
> > open_wr: /usr/qt
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:58:27PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
> out of its crib.
>
> I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
> Possibly this is something screamingly obviou
the command line with a message:
>
> error: C compiler cannot create executables
>
> The screen said to attach the file
>
> /var/tmp/portage/sandbox-1.2.17/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/config.log
>
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: e
Hi,
I hope somebody can help me.
I've written a new ebuild for "dev-python/imapclient-1.1.0" (the
latest version in the tree is version 0.13)
I've just copied dev-python/imapclient-0.13.ebuild and remove a patch
which is no longer needed.
Ebuilding this packag
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
> I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common "C
> compiler cannot create
te already.
>
> For example, if sandboxed, untrusted code wants to speculatively execute a
> memcpy(), then the sandbox would need to call it on behalf of the untrusted
> code. But if the sandbox is protected, the memcpy() call would never be made
> speculatively, since retpoline wil
ralfconn wrote:
> Il 02/09/24 01:56, Dale ha scritto:
>> FEATURES="-usersync userpriv usersandbox buildpkg sandbox parallel-fetch
>> parallel-install"
>>
>>
>> The ones I care about. The buildpkg tells it to save binary copies.
>> This is a
Trying to install (emerge)
app-emulation/virtualbox-modules
under the new 2.6.23 kernel dies with a sandbox violation
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-gentoo/null.gcda
using
FEATURES='-sandbox' emerge app-emulation/virtualbox-modules
helps.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer
On 6 Nov, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
> I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common "C
> compiler cannot create executables" error. Of course I
>
On 5/6/06, Marc Redmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,> I'm trying to emerge mythtv but keep running into a problem with sandbox.>> Whenever I try to emerge, the compiling seems to work fine, but the> installation fails and I get several 'Access Violations'. It s
knows
> >> Gentoo pretty well and may know that he doesn't need sandbox.
> >
> > Once for fun I build a gentoo system in VirtualBox and left sandbox out
> > by accident.
>
> Where did you leave it out? Or do you mean you "took" it out with a
> &
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" <mailto:cont...@nileshgr.com>> wrote:
> >
> > What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
> directly with userpriv?
>
> *advantage
>
I fou
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:29:10 +0200, Tomas Linhart wrote:
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> --- LOG FILE =
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gdm-2.8.0.1-1869.log"
>
> open_wr: /etc/pam.d/gdm
> open_wr
ossible only in firefox-bin builds. From that article (which is by
Mozilla's CTO, by the way),
Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds that will allow developers to use a
sandbox compiled on their own machine with the CDM as an
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> These sandbox violations happen all too frequently. You should
> raise a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org. For the time being,
> however, just do:
>
> FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge evolution
My make.global f
I get the error below when compiling sandbox (any version):
mv -f .deps/libsandbox_la-canonicalize.Tpo
.deps/libsandbox_la-canonicalize.Plo
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../libsbutil/.libs/libsbutil.a',
needed by `libsandbox.la'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portag
-- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > --- LOG FILE =
> > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_-_glib-2.14.3-11618.log"
> >
> > open_wr: /etc/passwd
> > ...
> > open_wr: /etc/passwd
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > emerge --in
be the problem, though.
> i can install everything using install.py directly (not emerging with
> portage). also, using FEATURES="-sandbox" i can emerge without
> problems. so this problem seems to be related to the "sandbox",
> something i never got to understand c
ght be the version of sys-apps/sandbox
On my "unstable" Portage system I'm using sandbox-2.6-rc1 while you have
version 2.5.
and info:
sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
Perhaps you should file a bug report about this "sandbox violation"
Sorry,
Helmut.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:57:05PM -0400, Nick Smith wrote:
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> compiler cannot create executables
I remember seeing this recently from sandbox:
If configure fails with a 'cannot run C compiled programs'
Hello,
I am successfully updating a remote system using ssh and screen, but for some
packages (e.g. rust, thunderbird, firefox) during the pre-merge checks I get
this message:
Unable to unshare: EINVAL (for FEATURES="ipc-sandbox network-sandbox
pid-sandbox")
FEATURES in my make.con
Antonio Coralles wrote:
> I've just read that word a couple of times now - but after sanbox was
> installed on my system becuause of the latest portage upgrade - i'm
> really courios to know what this tool is about ...
>
> Maybe someone can tell me more than http:
-
> LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-kde-misc_-_xmms-agent-1.1-15026.log"
>
> open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
> open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
> open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
> open_wr:
d two
> failures:
> > both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line.
> >
> > It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked
> > through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the
entoo was built with the following:
> USE="-test" ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_7 (-pypy3)
> -python3_6 (-python3_8)"
> FEATURES="binpkg-logs qa-unresolved-soname-deps multilib-strict sfperms
> fixlafiles preserve-libs unmerge-orphans use
On Monday 15 October 2007 12:29:42 Stefán István wrote:
> Thanks for the tip, the manual update was successful.
> Now I have another problem, when I try to update portage with the emerge
> command:
>
> # emerge -pv portage
> !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
&g
Hello guys,
I'm trying to write an ebuild for xmms plug-in, but always get an
error during of emerging it. Here it is:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-kde-misc_-_xmms-agent-1.1-15026.log"
Hello
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 07:11:14PM +, Noud Aldenhoven wrote:
> Could someone tell my how I can give my ebuild the rights to access
> /usr/bin? The script looks like this one:
The direct solution would be RESTRICT="sandbox" (or somehow like this,
not sure if it is the ex
On 10/25/2010 01:24 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 04:36 on Monday 25 October 2010, Dale did
> opine thusly:
>
>> Then again, Alan knows
>> Gentoo pretty well and may know that he doesn't need sandbox.
>
>
> Once for fun I buil
Hi,
I am trying to write an ebuild for media-libs/babl-
Unfortunately, probably when making docs, it invokes
inkscape which wants to access and write to
/root/.config/Inkscape
which probably comes from
$(HOME)/.config/Inkscape
This violates the sandbox - see below -
What can I do about it
Does this mean for portage -2.1.9.22 you advocate
FEATURES="buildsyspkg"
in make.conf?
If so is that the correct line or do we need
FEATURES="buildsyspkg sandbox"
I find the man page wording a little unclear and its warning about an
error serious.
thanks
allan
This is m
On 03/26/18 06:19, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
> installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
> expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
> both
On 03/26/2018 07:19 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
> installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
> expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
> both
What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
directly with userpriv?
On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> >
> > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
>
> Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug p
actually read the error message, these errors are
coming from setuptools, not from the Gentoo sandbox.
The last time that caused a problem, it was because of a missing
dependency. If your kernel supports it, you can set
FEATURES="network-sandbox" to catch those earlier.
em
> > e/
>
> It may not even be possible to enable it in Gentoo builds or it may be
> possible only in firefox-bin builds. From that article (which is by
> Mozilla's CTO, by the way),
>
> Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
> wo
Il 02/09/24 01:56, Dale ha scritto:
FEATURES="-usersync userpriv usersandbox buildpkg sandbox parallel-fetch
parallel-install"
The ones I care about. The buildpkg tells it to save binary copies.
This is a must if done in a chroot and you want to install elsewhere as
binaries bu
2.14.2'
>
> >>> Source compiled.
>
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> --- LOG FILE =
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gnome-panel-2.14.2-13019.log"
>
> This file contains
>
> unlink:/usr/share/xml2po/docbook.pyc
>
> An
t; both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line.
>
> It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked
> through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the
> environment with this box's, but noth
le thing like copy fail ?
>
> I don't know how to solve this problem, but it has already been
reported:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/686852
Thanks for the info.
In the meantime you can walk around the problem by not using the
sandbox like:
FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandbox"
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:51:33 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
> BUT!!! It seems that there is a bug with genlop and newer versions of
> portage because some issues with a sandbox lockfile. Search for
> "genlop sandbox" on bugs.gentoo.org for more info. In any case, for
> the time b
Hi guys,I'm trying to install bacula console on my amd64 notebook but I always get the same error after the build:--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-backup_-_bacula-
1.36.3-r3-26793.log"open_wr:
On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" wrote:
>
> What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
directly with userpriv?
*advantage
ms.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-604376-highlight-violation+summary+sandbox.html
>
> That should help. I hope anyway.
Thanks... using the FEATURE trick to turn off sandbox allows me to:
FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge -vu rsync
But according to your second link which leads to a message dated
perms
> > fixlafiles preserve-libs unmerge-orphans userpriv usersandbox userfetch
> > ipc-sandbox distlocks merge-sync protect-owned xattr unmerge-logs
> > ebuild-locks assume-digests sandbox strict news usersync
> > unknown-features-warn binpkg-docompress network-sandbox pid-
> > When I try to emerge gthumb, I get this at the end:
>
> >>>> Completed installing gthumb-2.6.3 into
> >>>> /var/tmp/portage/gthumb-2.6.3/image/
>
> > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > ---
On Friday 28 December 2007 22:58:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
> out of its crib.
>
> I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
> Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Turco
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 09:44
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] EINVAL
>
> > Unable to unshare: EINVAL (for FEATURES="ipc-sandbox network-sandbox
> pid-sandbox")
&g
On 12/6/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK so it built with FEATURES="-sandbox" but I guess I don't understand why.
> Could someone give a brief description of the cause of sandbox violations?
Sandbox violations occur when a build of a package tries
On 21 Jan, Justin wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> has anybody a hint how to get sys-cluster/mpich2 (-1.0.8)
>> emerged?
>>
>> I allways get ACCESS VIOLATION
>>
>> I've tried
>>
>> FEATURES=-sandbox
>>
>
Hi all,
Little history:
like many on this ML I decided that the time has come to switch over to the
64bit computing and went with fresh LiveDVD install of gentoo.
Cruel reality:
After doing stage3 install and making syncing portage I'm failing updates on
gcc and sandbox - both compla
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:03:47PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:51:33 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
>
> > BUT!!! It seems that there is a bug with genlop and newer versions of
> > portage because some issues with a sandbox lockfile. Search for
>
On 12/06/2017 09:08 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope somebody can help me.
>
> I've written a new ebuild for "dev-python/imapclient-1.1.0" (the
> latest version in the tree is version 0.13)...
>
> Ebuilding this packages dies of a Sandbox Vio
ceeds if run directly as root, or with FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandbox".
> >
> > Memory is >14GB:
> > # vmstat
> > procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system--
> > --cpu-
> > r b swpd free buff cache si so
I've just read that word a couple of times now - but after sanbox was
installed on my system becuause of the latest portage upgrade - i'm
really courios to know what this tool is about ...
Maybe someone can tell me more than http://gentoo-wiki.com/Sandbox ...
Antonio
--
gentoo-user@
Hi!
I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
finished:
>>> Source compiled.
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.l
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:38 +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge scrollkeeper
Thanks a lot, you just saved my day! Could you please tell me what
"sandbox" is?
Best regards,
jules
--
Jules Colding
PGP Public Key: 6266E7B7
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Tomas Linhart wrote:
> LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gdm-2.8.0.1-1869.log"
So, why not include this file? It probably includes oodles of useful
information.
--
[Name ] :: [Matan I. Peled]
[Location ] :: [Israel]
[Public Key] ::
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
> installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
> expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
> both glibc and sandbox failed
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:47 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:38 +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge scrollkeeper
>
> Thanks a lot, you just saved my day! Could you please tell me what
> "sandbox" is?
Unfortunate
Hello Alan,
thanks for the reply. I tried to compile it "external" and it worked
after i deactivated the gui (--disable-gui). So i removed the gnome USE
flag and was able to install it.
Disabling the sandbox feature didn't lead to success.
Thanks a lot for your help!
cu
Max
t; Or in this case, it doesn't mean it's not justified. I now have buildpkg
>> > enabled for @system - everything else I can re-run emerge to fix.
>>
>> Does this mean for portage -2.1.9.22 you advocate
>> FEATURES="buildsyspkg"
>> in make.con
Makurin Roman wrote:
> Hi All
> I cant install neon, it gives me sandbox violation :-(
> Is there any way to solve this ?
>
> 10nx
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge neon
Be warned that build scripts will have unsandboxed root privivileges. This bug
is strange. Others have experi
I've downgrade sandbox & it works, thanks both of you.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Zsitvai János wrote:
> Kevin wrote:
>> and here it is emerge --info:
>> http://dpaste.com/hold/47084/
>
> According to http://bugs.gentoo.org/267053, downgrading sandbox to ve
he feature of portage that rebuilds
all (most?) libraries twice, once for /lib32, and once for /lib64, to
support 32-bit and 64-bit applications respectively.
Unless you are using a no-multilib sub-profile (which you are not), it
is normal that sandbox will attempt to be built as a 32-bit version.
The
to be done for 'all'.
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.44.1/work/e2fsprogs-libs-1.44.1-ab
> i_x86_64.amd64/lib/et'
And the sandbox report:
* ----------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> ---
>>> Source configured.
* --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
* LOG FILE: "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-16492.log"
*
VERSION 1.0
FORMAT: F - Function called
FORMAT: S - Access Status
FORMAT: P - Path as passed to function
FORMAT: A -
1 - 100 of 1431 matches
Mail list logo
