On 16 May 2006 18:06:07 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
KHotkeys uses a text config file, although it's layout is even more
arcane than that of xbindkeys.
Where is it?
~/.kde/share/config/khotkeysrc
enjoy :)
--
Neil Bothwick
There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what
On 16 May 2006 15:25:58 -0500, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I love YaKuake. It's better than Kuake in that it's just Konsole on a
miniblinds widget. It's superior because of its ultra-accessibility.
Anywhere you can just hit your key combination and *pop*
* On May 9 19:33, Neil Bothwick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
I am writing a comparative review of a number of X terminals, so I
thought I'd draw on the collective wisdom of this list. which are your
most/least favourite X terminals, and why?
I use aterm exclusively. It opens
Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:26:30PM +0200, Penguin Lover Jure Varlec squawked:
I use yakuake. It's the the best drop-down terminal I've ever used, and I
believe I tried almost all of them (there really aren't many). Off the top
of
my head, I recall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I love YaKuake. It's better than Kuake in that it's just Konsole on a
miniblinds widget. It's superior because of its ultra-accessibility.
Anywhere you can just hit your key combination and *pop* there's trusty old
YaKuake. It supports multiple console tabs,
On 16 May 2006 15:25:58 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
I love YaKuake. It's better than Kuake in that it's just Konsole on
a miniblinds widget. It's superior because of its
ultra-accessibility. Anywhere you can just hit your key combination
and *pop* there's trusty old YaKuake. It supports
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16 May 2006 15:25:58 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
I love YaKuake. It's better than Kuake in that it's just Konsole on
a miniblinds widget. It's superior because of its
ultra-accessibility. Anywhere you can just hit your key combination
and
On 16 May 2006 16:35:23 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
If you only use KDE, you may as well define all your key bindings in
KHotkeys.
Maybe you haven't noticed that KHotkeys is painfully slow to use for
more than one setting. Or that it cannot set several dozen Keycombos
at once.
No, I
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 02:56:46PM -0500, Penguin Lover Harry Putnam squawked:
I also looked for a drop-down term. Couldn't find one that I really
liked, so just made a wrapper myself for aterm in fvwm using a
borderless window, key binding for focus and shading, and EdgeCommand.
It is
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16 May 2006 16:35:23 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
If you only use KDE, you may as well define all your key bindings in
KHotkeys.
Maybe you haven't noticed that KHotkeys is painfully slow to use for
more than one setting. Or that it cannot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 02:41 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Samuel Baldwin wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
It provides a nice
change of pace, so that way, when you're running a terminal in X, it
doesn't look exactly like the regular shell.
Well - a terminal is
Alexander Skwar wrote:
My text color is black, as my background is white, which is, BTW,
the best to read for the majority of people (if you're not handicapped,
that is). That's so, because the contrast between the text and the
background cannot be higher than with black on white (or white on
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
...
At home I use rxvt. Simple, very fast on startup.
At work I use konsole. I like the session thing it has and the tabs,
since I use a lot of interactive shell apps like python-ipython-octave
at work they often comes quite handy.
If you
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 02:41 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Samuel Baldwin wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency?
Granted, it'll look better, but that's it.
IMO transparency is one of
* Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09/05/06 21:45]:
I am writing a comparative review of a number of X terminals, so I
thought I'd draw on the collective wisdom of this list. which are your
most/least favourite X terminals, and why?
I mostly use xterm, since it's fast and has almost all of
On Tue, 09 May 2006 19:33:51 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I am writing a comparative review of a number of X terminals, so I
thought I'd draw on the collective wisdom of this list. which are your
most/least favourite X terminals, and why?
Let's hope this generates some interesting comment
On 5/9/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2006 19:33:51 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
E-Term is pretty and extensible and thememable too. I like the kde
terminal program also because of the tabs you can have on the bottom to
open multiple, discreet sessions. It really comes down to
Richard Fish wrote:
I use konsole, for no other reason than it is the default in my
favorite DE. My configuration is pretty minimalistic, no tab or menu
bars.
Same here. I use no special terminal features at all, except the
scrollback, which is pretty standard everywhere.
I sometimes use
Justin Findlay wrote:
I find that one of the most attractive features of a terminal
application is transparency
That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency?
Granted, it'll look better, but that's it.
IMO transparency is one
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Justin Findlay wrote:
I find that one of the most attractive features of a terminal
application is transparency
That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency?
Granted, it'll look better, but that's
On 5/9/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency?
It can be really annoying if you overdo it, and you have to find the
right balance of opacity and colors (since lots of terminal
Alexander Skwar wrote: That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency? Granted, it'll look better, but that's it.
IMO transparency is one of the most useless features.
True, it's not that usefull, but it does look nice. It provides
On 5/9/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Findlay wrote:
I find that one of the most attractive features of a terminal
application is transparency
That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency?
Granted, it'll
Samuel Baldwin wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on
a terminal harder to read, by using transparency?
Granted, it'll look better, but that's it.
IMO transparency is one of the most useless features.
True, it's not that usefull, but it
Alexander Skwar wrote: Well - a terminal is something to work with. And this has to be functional and not provide a change of pace.Yeah. True. I like that thing though. Cause, since I use different backgrounds for each of my desktops, depending on what desktop I'm using, I'll get a different
25 matches
Mail list logo
