On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:18:23 -0800, Grant wrote:
find / -exec qfile -o '{}' \;
Thanks Willie, that gave me a great list. Very cool command. Almost
all the orphaned stuff in /usr/lib/perl5 is either in:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.2
with corresponding but not orphaned contents in:
Willie Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu wrote:
So to go through your system looking for all orphaned files, you do
something like
find / -exec qfile -o '{}' \;
... which will produce a load of output that you don't want. So best
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Jörg
--
Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Could you enlighten me about this?
I look into man find but it says nothing about -exec + or a + operator
at all. Also adding + to the command doesn't work either.
Greetings
Sebastian Beßler
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:52 +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Could you enlighten me about this?
I look into man find but it says nothing about -exec + or a + operator
at all. Also adding + to the
Am 17.11.2010 13:54, schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:52 +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Could you enlighten me about this?
I look into man find but it says nothing about -exec + or
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:13 +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 13:54, schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:52 +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Could you enlighten me about
On 17/11/2010, at 1:13pm, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Could you enlighten me about this?
I look into man find but it says nothing about -exec + or a + operator
at all. Also adding + to the command doesn't work either.
Which man page are you
On 17/11/2010, at 12:58am, Grant wrote:
I was having trouble getting g-cpan to work with a Bundle of CPAN perl
modules and I got frustrated and started to install it with perl
-MCPAN -e instead.
The state of g-cpan really is a shame. :(
When I bought a lottery ticket the other week, I
On 11/17/2010 05:13 AM, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 13:54, schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:52 +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
Could you enlighten me about this?
I look
Am 17.11.2010 23:14, schrieb John Campbell:
On 11/17/2010 05:13 AM, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 13:54, schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:52 +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years.
I wasnt familiar with + but it changes the default behavior of this;
find /path -name something -exec ls -lS {} \;
which will run ls -lS once for each file, and therefore Sort doesnt work as
its only sorting a single file
find /patch -name something -exec -ls -lS +
which runs ls -lS once against
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:49 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Adam
Carter did opine thusly:
I wasnt familiar with + but it changes the default behavior of this;
find /path -name something -exec ls -lS {} \;
which will run ls -lS once for each file, and therefore Sort doesnt work as
its
find /patch -name something -exec -ls -lS +
which runs ls -lS once against all the files that find finds (added as
additional arguments), and therefore Sort works.
Almost right.
-exec + will not append all filenames found and run one command,
it will append the maximum number of
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:03 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Adam
Carter did opine thusly:
find /patch -name something -exec -ls -lS +
which runs ls -lS once against all the files that find finds (added as
additional arguments), and therefore Sort works.
Almost right.
I was having trouble getting g-cpan to work with a Bundle of CPAN perl
modules and I got frustrated and started to install it with perl
-MCPAN -e instead. After a little while I thought better of it and
exited the installation, but should I now have perl modules spread
across my filesystem that
but should I now have perl modules spread
across my filesystem that aren't known by portage? Is there any way
to clean them up? Would installing the same Bundle with g-cpan be
guaranteed to straighten everything out?
qfile -orphans ?
but should I now have perl modules spread
across my filesystem that aren't known by portage? Is there any way
to clean them up? Would installing the same Bundle with g-cpan be
guaranteed to straighten everything out?
qfile -orphans ?
That sounds promising but I get:
# qfile --orphans
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:42:24PM -0800, Grant wrote:
qfile -orphans ?
That sounds promising but I get:
# qfile --orphans
Usage: qfile opts filename : list all pkgs owning files
qfile --orphans needs to take input a filename.
So to go through your system looking for all orphaned
qfile -orphans ?
That sounds promising but I get:
# qfile --orphans
Usage: qfile opts filename : list all pkgs owning files
qfile --orphans needs to take input a filename.
So to go through your system looking for all orphaned files, you do
something like
find / -exec qfile -o '{}'
19 matches
Mail list logo
