On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:54:44 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
> One option that I would like is for the build to be done completely in
> ram until it's compiled and ready to be placed on disk. HDD I/O is the
> slowest part of the system avoiding it as much as possible on systems
> with ple
> -Original Message-
> From: Zsitvai János [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:47 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview
>
> Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
&g
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:46:12 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
>
>> Portage can continue to build packages if one fails.
>>
>> # emerge -options package/list_of_packages || until emerge
>> -same_options_as_before package/list_of_packages ; do : ;
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:46 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
> Portage can continue to build packages if one fails.
>
> # emerge -options package/list_of_packages || until emerge
> -same_options_as_before package/list_of_packages ; do : ;done
yes but wouldn't this continue regardless of
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:46:12 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
> Portage can continue to build packages if one fails.
>
> # emerge -options package/list_of_packages || until emerge
> -same_options_as_before package/list_of_packages ; do : ;done
Yes it can, but not with this, which will re
> -Original Message-
> From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:46 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
>
>
On Thursday 20 December 2007 09:43:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> flagedit will warn you if you have any unsupported USE flags set. That
> and eix-test-obsolete are useful for keeping make.conf and /etc/portage
> clear of cruft.
And the config-decruft ruby script that can be used with Paludis can do th
On Thursday 20 December 2007 10:08:13 Rumen Yotov wrote:
> >> Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the
> >> use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag.
> >
> > Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists.
[...]
> Regarding cl
> Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
>
> http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
>
> Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, and very satisfied. Even with the earlier versions.
ralf
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:08:13 +0200, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Regarding claws-mail there's a script to rebuild it's plugins - see
> elogs. Since i first tried paludis-0.2.1, may still have some old use
> info (laziness) about paludis USE-flag (IIRC revdep-rebuild &
> portage-utils, etc.had it).
flaged
Bo Ørsted Andresen написа:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:37:38 Rumen Yotov wrote:
>
>> Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the
>> use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag.
>>
>
> Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such us
Grant wrote:
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
- Grant
i'm completely delete portage and use paludis.
work's fine ;)
--
С уважен
Richard Marzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> May i have that script? I assume it's GPLed :-)
Honestly, calling it a script is an embellishment.
Perhaps phrasing it as 'something that keeps the faster moving parts of
configuration in sync' would have been better.
echo '*/* x86' > /etc/paludis/ke
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
> "b.n." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
> > I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can
> > someone confirm it? It would be useful for a transition.
>
> It works just fi
On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:46:20 Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me
> > over all over again. :)
>
> I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with
> building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are me
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
> And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me
> over all over again. :)
I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with
building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are met why
stop
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:37:38 Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the
> use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag.
Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists. Kind of
curious how that relate
Mark Shields ha scritto:
> Portage has proved more than adequate for my needs. Paladis doesn't
> seem like anything I need or want.
Well, Portage is adequate for my needs too, and I've never tried Paludis
but the very "continue-on-failure" and "underlays" things look like,
for example, two smal
"b.n." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
> I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can
> someone confirm it? It would be useful for a transition.
It works just fine. :) Later versions have the ability to use portage
configuration f
On (19/12/07 20:05) b.n. wrote:
> Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:43:41 Grant wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
> >
> > Yes, I did it long time ago :-)
>
> I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
> I think I've read that Port
On Dec 19, 2007 2:46 PM, Naga Toro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17.43.41 Grant wrote:
> > Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
> >
> >
> http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensor
> >ed
>
> excellent is a
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17.43.41 Grant wrote:
> Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
>
> http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensor
>ed
excellent is a bit much... Seems like a propaganda pice to me.
That said I did find paludis a
> > Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
> >
> > http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
> >
> Thanks for the link.
It really got the meta-wheels turning for me. I found especially
interesting the fact that Paludis's use on Gento
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:43:41 Grant wrote:
>
>> Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
>
> Yes, I did it long time ago :-)
I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can
someone c
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:43:41 Grant wrote:
> Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, I did it long time ago :-)
Bye...
Dirk
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
On (19/12/07 08:43) Grant wrote:
> Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
>
> http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
>
Thanks for the link.
> Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
>
Yes, for some 4-5 months and pl
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
- Grant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
27 matches
Mail list logo
