RE: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-11 Thread Daevid Vincent
Don't spend too much time, as it's a waste. You will NOT see my MAC address. Not because I try to disguise it, but because it won't be available to you. That's simply how TCP/IP works. There is one caveat to this, I if you are running a 802.11 wifi, the MAC is sent in the packets and then

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-07 Thread Devon Miller
An option for ports that don't need to be open constantly (like 80 443) is to use net-misc/knockd.Portknocking allows a port to be opened on demand in response to a series of attempted port opens.There's a wiki page on it here: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Port_Knocking.Note, if he is on the

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Lord Sauron wrote: Sorry to be a bit elementary, but if you're not colocating your box, and you don't often use SSH, you might want to consider disabling remote administrative things. Of course - disable everything, that you don't need. ESPECIALLY, if it is reachable over the network. All

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-06 Thread Lord Sauron
On 7/5/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steven Susbauer wrote: On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Ryan Tandy wrote: Lord Sauron wrote: If you can, what I'd do is try and get the guy's MAC Address or something and then totally block that off. That's send him away right quickly. I don't know

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-06 Thread Lord Sauron
On 7/5/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lord Sauron wrote: Sorry to be a bit elementary, but if you're not colocating your box, and you don't often use SSH, you might want to consider disabling remote administrative things. Of course - disable everything, that you don't need.

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Lord Sauron wrote: On 7/5/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lord Sauron wrote: How should *THAT* help? In 99.999% of the times, the attacker won't be on the same subnet, and thus the MAC isn't available. Couldn't hurt. Well, as it doesn't buy you

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-06 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 7/6/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steven Susbauer wrote: On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Ryan Tandy wrote: Lord Sauron wrote: If you can, what I'd do is try and get the guy's MAC Address or something and then totally block that off.

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Alexander Skwar
Ryan Tandy wrote: you're running a firewall of some kind (and you'd be crazy not to for any publically accessible box), Actually, I'd disagree. If only the necessary publicly accessible services are running on a box, what good should a firewal (I suppose you mean packet filter, like iptables)

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Trenton Adams
I would move ssh to a very high port number of your choice. Most ssh port scanners do not bother checking anything other than port 22, as it is too time consuming. I have not had any weird hits on my ssh port in years. It was hammered daily, even with attempted logins and such, with it running

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Daniel
Grant wrote: It has come to my attention that a particular person I know may be intent on attacking my server/website in any way possible. He doesn't know much about Linux but does know Windows. What kind of things should I lock down to protect my remote hosted server? I don't have time to

Re: Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread jarry
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you're running a firewall of some kind (and you'd be crazy not to for any publically accessible box), Actually, I'd disagree. If only the necessary publicly accessible services are running on a box, what good should a firewal (I suppose you mean

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Alexander Skwar
Trenton Adams wrote: I would move ssh to a very high port number of your choice. Most ssh port scanners do not bother checking anything other than port 22, as it is too time consuming. I have not had any weird hits on my ssh port in years. It was hammered daily, even with attempted logins

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread jarry
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If I were a script kiddie, I wouldn't bother looking at normally open ports. But if there's something strange like 65350, I *would* imho, if someone wants to attack your server, he will scan all ports and will try to find which apps are using

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 7/5/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trenton Adams wrote: I would move ssh to a very high port number of your choice. Most ssh port scanners do not bother checking anything other than port 22, as it is too time consuming. I have not had any weird hits on my ssh port in

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Ryan Tandy
Alexander Skwar wrote: Ryan Tandy wrote: you're running a firewall of some kind (and you'd be crazy not to for any publically accessible box), Actually, I'd disagree. If only the necessary publicly accessible services are running on a box, what good should a firewal (I suppose you mean

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Lord Sauron
Sorry to be a bit elementary, but if you're not colocating your box, and you don't often use SSH, you might want to consider disabling remote administrative things. All your Windoze friend will try to do is exploit MySQL to pop a DOS shell into your system. It's an older trick, however, it

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Ryan Tandy
Lord Sauron wrote: If you can, what I'd do is try and get the guy's MAC Address or something and then totally block that off. That's send him away right quickly. I don't know enough to know if that'd be totally possible, but if the guy isn't terribly intelligent, that'll send him packing.

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Steven Susbauer
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Ryan Tandy wrote: Lord Sauron wrote: If you can, what I'd do is try and get the guy's MAC Address or something and then totally block that off. That's send him away right quickly. I don't know enough to know if that'd be totally possible, but if the guy isn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-05 Thread Ryan Tandy
Steven Susbauer wrote: On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Ryan Tandy wrote: Lord Sauron wrote: If you can, what I'd do is try and get the guy's MAC Address or something and then totally block that off. That's send him away right quickly. I don't know enough to know if that'd be totally possible, but if

[gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-04 Thread Grant
It has come to my attention that a particular person I know may be intent on attacking my server/website in any way possible. He doesn't know much about Linux but does know Windows. What kind of things should I lock down to protect my remote hosted server? I don't have time to get too crazy

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-04 Thread Ryan Tandy
Grant wrote: It has come to my attention that a particular person I know may be intent on attacking my server/website in any way possible. He doesn't know much about Linux but does know Windows. What kind of things should I lock down to protect my remote hosted server? I don't have time to

Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting my server against an individual

2006-07-04 Thread Thomas Cort
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:56:02 -0700 Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has come to my attention that a particular person I know may be intent on attacking my server/website in any way possible. He doesn't know much about Linux but does know Windows. What kind of things should I lock down to