On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:33:59 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:08:34 -0400, German wrote:
Forget about chmod 770. Better do a chmod g+rw. :-)
Tried it, it also doesn't stay permanently. OK, no solution :(
The correct solution is a udev rule, but
On 03/17/2015 11:35 AM, hw wrote:
For now, I've installed the missing module with cpan. Are we actually
supposed to run cpan as root to be able to put the required files into
the library directory?
You aren't supposed to use CPAN at all, it will break stuff. Here's an
ebuild for
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:03:21 -0400
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:08 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 01:16:32 +0100 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
waben...@gmail.com wrote:
So it seems that after login you first have to chmod 770 the tty
Hi people!
I have problems getting these blocks at a system update solved...
I executed:
emerge --backtrack=30 -fuDN @system @world
Any ideas ?!
...
...
...
[blocks B ] perl-core/ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0
(perl-core/ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0 is blocking
On 03/17/2015 09:11 PM, Tamer Higazi wrote:
Hi people!
I have problems getting these blocks at a system update solved...
I executed:
emerge --backtrack=30 -fuDN @system @world
Any ideas ?!
...
...
...
[blocks B ] perl-core/ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:11:25 AM Tamer Higazi wrote:
Hi people!
I have problems getting these blocks at a system update solved...
I executed:
emerge --backtrack=30 -fuDN @system @world
Any ideas ?!
...
...
...
[blocks B ] perl-core/ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:49:54 PM walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
BTW, I tried the latest firefox in a Win7 virtual machine and I
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:49:54 PM walt wrote:
BTW, I tried the latest firefox in a Win7 virtual machine and I was
shocked to see that firefox was updating itself when I was logged in
as an unprivileged user (i.e. *not* an Administrator). Are the idiots
at M$ *really* that stupid? They've
On 17/03/2015 03:43, Dale wrote:
[...snip]
root@fireball / # emerge -uvaDN world -t
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ] lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r4::gentoo
[nomerge ] x11-misc/pcmanfm-1.2.3::gentoo
Michael Orlitzky mjo at gentoo.org writes:
$ git clone git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git
Then, from within the repo,
$ man man/portage.5
FANTASTIC!
Search for repos.conf.
Yep, lots of excellent, current info!
The epatch_user function comes from eutils.eclass (you can
Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Your basic problem is that you have static and static-libs in USE. When
applied to lvm, a whole bunch of blockers kick in and you get what you
got. So take them out of USE.
USE=static
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:42 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:03:21 -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek had asked whether you were using systemd and therefore logind.
Since you're using openrc, perhaps you should check whether installing
consolekit is a
On 03/17/2015 01:41 PM, James wrote:
Hello,
https://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/man/portage.5.html
(vintage feb_2014)
This seems to be the latest version of the portage man page I can
find that is publicly published. Are there any more recent
versions, publicly published?
On 17/03/2015 20:10, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Your basic problem is that you have static and static-libs in USE. When
applied to lvm, a whole bunch of blockers kick in and you get what you
got. So take them out of USE.
USE=static static-libs has it's uses, it's great for building
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 17/03/2015 22:16, Dale wrote:
Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Your basic problem is that you have static and static-libs in USE. When
applied to lvm, a whole bunch of blockers kick in and you
Am 2015-03-13 um 15:11 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:55:27 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
See above. The reason for using a RAID1 array is to avoid
having to update multiple disks, just mount /boot on the RAID
device.
% mount | grep boot /dev/md0 on /boot type ext2
On Tuesday 17 Mar 2015 09:25:44 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 17/03/2015 11:23, hw wrote:
Hi,
wasn't there some option for syslog-ng to do log rotation by itself, or
are we supposed to have logrotate installed along with it?
the latter
metalog does its own rotation, syslog-ng requires
On 17/03/2015 11:23, hw wrote:
Hi,
wasn't there some option for syslog-ng to do log rotation by itself, or
are we supposed to have logrotate installed along with it?
the latter
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login process
reveals that login set things as you tell it to in /etc/login.defs
In
Hello,
https://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/man/portage.5.html
(vintage feb_2014)
This seems to be the latest version of the portage man page I can
find that is publicly published. Are there any more recent
versions, publicly published?
What is(are) the best doc(s) on repos.conf and
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/17/2015 06:56 AM, Bob Wya wrote:
I've not seen any that are OpenRC specific... But this one is pretty
decent for SysVInit vs. systemd...
http://linoxide.com/linux-command/systemd-vs-sysvinit-cheatsheet/
Yeah I found
On Mar 17, 2015, at 19:33, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login process
reveals that
On 17/03/2015 19:01, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 17/03/2015 03:43, Dale wrote:
[...snip]
root@fireball / # emerge -uvaDN world -t
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ]
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Your basic problem is that you have static and static-libs in USE. When
applied to lvm, a whole bunch of blockers kick in and you get what you
got. So take them out of USE.
USE=static static-libs has it's uses, it's great for building rescue
disks, busybox and maybe
Michael Orlitzky mjo at gentoo.org writes:
$ git clone git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git
OK so in the /usr/local/portage dir I started this process. Its downloading
at a blistering 20-30 KiB/s. I about to call the ISP, but in the the
mean time here are a few more comments.
Am Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:20:45 -0400
schrieb Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/17/2015 06:56 AM, Bob Wya wrote:
I've not seen any that are OpenRC specific... But this one is pretty
decent for SysVInit vs. systemd...
On 03/17/2015 05:47 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
Mozilla installs a
privileged service that auto updates its software.
Interesting. I didn't know about 'privileged services' in Windows.
I hope M$ grants these 'privileges' carefully.
On 03/17/2015 06:15 PM, walt wrote:
On 03/17/2015 05:47 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
Mozilla installs a
privileged service that auto updates its software.
Interesting. I didn't know about 'privileged services' in Windows.
I hope M$ grants these 'privileges' carefully.
You mean the user. Any app
On 03/17/2015 07:49 PM, walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
BTW, I tried the latest firefox in a Win7 virtual machine and I was
shocked to see
On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
I haven't tried, honestly. But I have had problems with Firefox not
including
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
BTW, I tried the latest firefox in a Win7 virtual machine and I was
shocked to see that firefox was updating itself when
On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login process
reveals that login set things as you tell it to in /etc/login.defs
In this file change the line:
TTYPERM 0600
To:
TTYPERM 0620
And your problem is
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Your basic problem is that you have static and static-libs in USE. When
applied to lvm, a whole bunch of blockers kick in and you get what you
got. So take them out of USE.
USE=static static-libs has it's
On Mar 17, 2015, at 21:52, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:39:46 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 19:33, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar
On 03/17/2015 03:08 PM, James wrote:
It will probably be in EAPI6 under a different name, but I don't
think there's any code written yet.
Is there a preliminary doc on EAPI6? I know there is still some
unfinished business therein, but, the sooner we can start reading
the better. For
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:39:46 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 19:33, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
I've gotten to the point where I can make sense of portage output (it
took a while!) but I have no idea how to explain how I do it :-)
Portage makes a very fundamental blunder - it exposes the underlying
implementation in the output. The odds are very slim the average user
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:14:03 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 21:52, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:39:46 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 19:33, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 17/03/2015 22:16, Dale wrote:
Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Your basic problem is that you have static and static-libs in USE. When
applied to lvm, a whole bunch of blockers kick in and you get what you
got. So
On 17/03/2015 22:20, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
I've gotten to the point where I can make sense of portage output (it
took a while!) but I have no idea how to explain how I do it :-)
Portage makes a very fundamental blunder - it exposes the underlying
implementation in the output. The
I've not seen any that are OpenRC specific... But this one is pretty decent
for SysVInit vs. systemd...
http://linoxide.com/linux-command/systemd-vs-sysvinit-cheatsheet/
On 17 March 2015 at 01:58, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Daniel Frey
Bruce Schultz brulzki at gmail.com writes:
emerge --depclean -p
case (1)
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--exclude gentoo-sources @dev-java
NOw this is strange. Today it only wants to delete a few packages:
All selected packages: =dev-lang/vala-0.26.2 =dev-java/junit-4.11
=dev-java/jmock-1.1.0-r2
On 03/17/2015 06:56 AM, Bob Wya wrote:
I've not seen any that are OpenRC specific... But this one is pretty
decent for SysVInit vs. systemd...
http://linoxide.com/linux-command/systemd-vs-sysvinit-cheatsheet/
Yeah I found one similar to that, but located elsewhere. Maybe if I have
some time
On 15/03/2015 02:25, James wrote:
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that
it will updated but not depclean out those packages.
A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in /etc/portage/sets.
Ok so I created
I managed to recover the files on the CD! I used ddrescue which eventually
was able to read the media and then ran photorec to retrieve the jpeg photos
from the rescued image.
ddrescue could not read the CD every time, but reinserting a few times on my
laptop managed to start reading it.
--
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:15:38 + (UTC), James wrote:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--exclude gentoo-sources @dev-java
NOw this is strange. Today it only wants to delete a few packages:
All selected packages: =dev-lang/vala-0.26.2 =dev-java/junit-4.11
=dev-java/jmock-1.1.0-r2
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:53:44 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 14, 2015, at 12:47, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:33:59 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:08:34 -0400, German wrote:
Forget about
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 17/03/2015 03:43, Dale wrote:
[...snip]
root@fireball / # emerge -uvaDN world -t
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ] lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r4::gentoo
[nomerge ]
48 matches
Mail list logo
