Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 14:46:39 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 11/12/2015 12:35 AM, netfab wrote: > > Le 11/11/15 à 17:38, the...@sys-concept.com a tapoté : > >> When I start one of my firefox profile (even in "-safe-mode") it uses > >> 100% CPU and is not responding. > > > > If it works in

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 22:10:12 Mick wrote: > On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 20:56:28 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > On 11/12/2015 01:40 PM, Mick wrote: > > > On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 14:46:39 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > >> On 11/12/2015 12:35 AM, netfab wrote: > > >>> Le 11/11/15 à 17:38,

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On 11/12/2015 01:40 PM, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 14:46:39 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> On 11/12/2015 12:35 AM, netfab wrote: >>> Le 11/11/15 à 17:38, the...@sys-concept.com a tapoté : When I start one of my firefox profile (even in "-safe-mode") it uses 100% CPU and is

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge order not deterministic !?

On 11/11/2015 21:35, Walter Dnes wrote: > Ongoing installation. I looked at 2 instances of > "emerge -pv x11-base/xorg-server" and the order was somewhat different. > Here are a couple of outputs, just a few seconds apart. Is this a bug > or a feature? See attachments. > Emerge order is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:48:48 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> > Hmmm. And how can you then ever use > >> > >> emerge --resume --skip-fist > >> > >> if not even the first build is deterministic? I skip the first > >> package anyway only if the problematic package is the first one to > >> build

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:48:48 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >>> > Hmmm. And how can you then ever use >> >> >> >> emerge --resume --skip-fist >> >> >> >> if not even the first build is deterministic? I skip the first >> >> package anyway only if the problematic package

Re: [gentoo-user] Fileserver with Raid + Crypto + BtrFS

On Wednesday 11 November 2015 23:08:44 Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:15 +0100, Ralf wrote: >> And thinking about btrfs snapshot feature, using some 'btrfs history >> tool', i would probably only be able to see a lot of crypto garbage when >> going through my history (which can

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

On 12/11/2015 10:29, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On 11/11/2015 21:35, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> Ongoing installation. I looked at 2 instances of >>> "emerge -pv x11-base/xorg-server" and the order was somewhat different. >>> Here are a couple of outputs, just a few seconds

Re: [gentoo-user] Akonadi database errors

On Thursday, November 12, 2015 07:30:49 AM Mick wrote: > On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 04:48:49 J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On 11 November 2015 23:07:41 CET, Mick wrote: > > >On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 20:28:07 Marc Joliet wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 11 November 2015 20:37:24 J.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:35:14 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Then use emerge --keep-going and portage will take care of skipping > > failing merges for you. > > Ah, no, that's not an option. It breaks for a reason. Sometimes I can > ignore that and look for it later and in this case I skip it,

[gentoo-user] Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/11/2015 21:35, Walter Dnes wrote: >> Ongoing installation. I looked at 2 instances of >> "emerge -pv x11-base/xorg-server" and the order was somewhat different. >> Here are a couple of outputs, just a few seconds apart. Is this a bug >> or a feature? See

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 12/11/2015 10:29, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/2015 21:35, Walter Dnes wrote: Ongoing installation. I looked at 2 instances of "emerge -pv x11-base/xorg-server" and the order was somewhat different. Here are a couple of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

On 12/11/2015 10:48, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On 12/11/2015 10:29, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 11/11/2015 21:35, Walter Dnes wrote: > Ongoing installation. I looked at 2 instances of > "emerge -pv x11-base/xorg-server" and the order

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 12/11/2015 10:48, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >>> On 12/11/2015 10:29, Jörg Schaible wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: [snip] Hmmm. And how can you then ever use emerge --resume --skip-fist if not even the first build is

Re: [gentoo-user] AC WiFi Card

On 11/12/2015 01:08 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On 2015-11-11 11:53, Ralf wrote: >> So I was looking for some PCI-E Wifi Card, that supports AC standard. I >> was thinking about sth. like this [1]. A friend of mine told me, that I >> should take care when buying AC hardware, as there is rare

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:56:28PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote > I do agree, but I'm looking for a way to fix it. What file should I > delete from Firefox profile. I just want to retain bookmarks, passwords > etc. Do *NOT* delete any files just see. I would suggest the following

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 20:56:28 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 11/12/2015 01:40 PM, Mick wrote: > > On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 14:46:39 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> On 11/12/2015 12:35 AM, netfab wrote: > >>> Le 11/11/15 à 17:38, the...@sys-concept.com a tapoté : > When I start one of

[gentoo-user] Re: firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:38:45 -0700 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When I start one of my firefox profile (even in "-save-mode") it uses > 100% CPU and is not responding. > > Any way to fix it? I had a bad problem with the firefox profile manager about a year ago and I decided that the devs at

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] LINGUAS issue

2015-11-12 16:27 GMT-02:00 : > Francisco Ares wrote: > > > Hi, all. > > > > My locale language is "pt_BR" (Brazilian Portuguese), and many > > applications now support native translations. > > > > And there is the "pt" possible LINGUAS entry, and there is no

Re: [gentoo-user] What's happened to "Firefox Hello" on my system?

Hello, netfab. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:58:29PM +0100, netfab wrote: > If you are using ESR versions (gentoo stable), Hello is currently > disabled (see ¹). I hope it will be enabled in the next ESR. Maybe it will be. > You could try with with the ~arch version of firefox, it should be >

Re: [gentoo-user] AC WiFi Card

On 12/11/2015 13:52, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:05:02AM +0100, Ralf wrote: >> On 11/12/2015 01:08 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: >>> I do not run any APs, but I manage plenty of laptops with 5GHz Intel >>> chipsets, and never had a problem. Is there any reason you are not

Re: [gentoo-user] AC WiFi Card

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:05:02AM +0100, Ralf wrote: > On 11/12/2015 01:08 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > I do not run any APs, but I manage plenty of laptops with 5GHz Intel > > chipsets, and never had a problem. Is there any reason you are not > > using a dedicated AP instead of a wireless

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSSH upgrade warning

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > A major upgrade to OpenSSH is being stabilized: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 > > The default of PermitRootLogin for sshd in the new version is > "prohibit-password". If you typically log in to the

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

Thelma On 11/12/2015 05:30 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:56:28PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote > >> I do agree, but I'm looking for a way to fix it. What file should I >> delete from Firefox profile. I just want to retain bookmarks, passwords >> etc. > > Do

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > > Thelma > > On 11/12/2015 08:22 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > > the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > > > [...] > >> Though, I can not import the bookmarks, I'm on Firefox-bin-38.3.0 > >> There is no entry: Bookmarks ==> Manage Bookmarks > >> I have: Bookmarks

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Thursday, November 12, 2015 08:10:39 PM the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Thelma > > On 11/12/2015 05:30 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:56:28PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote > > > >> I do agree, but I'm looking for a way to fix it. What file should I > >> delete

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On 11/12/2015 12:35 AM, netfab wrote: > Le 11/11/15 à 17:38, the...@sys-concept.com a tapoté : >> When I start one of my firefox profile (even in "-safe-mode") it uses >> 100% CPU and is not responding. > > > If it works in safe-mode, but not without it, then you could try to > remove all

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: [...] > Though, I can not import the bookmarks, I'm on Firefox-bin-38.3.0 > There is no entry: Bookmarks ==> Manage Bookmarks > I have: Bookmarks ==> Show All Bookmarks > where I can restore and backup bookmars. I've tried to restore > bookmarks from file:

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:10:39PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote > Though, I can not import the bookmarks, I'm on Firefox-bin-38.3.0 > There is no entry: Bookmarks ==> Manage Bookmarks > I have: Bookmarks ==> Show All Bookmarks > where I can restore and backup bookmars. I've tried to

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > > Thelma > > On 11/12/2015 05:30 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:56:28PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com > > wrote > > > >> I do agree, but I'm looking for a way to fix it. What file should I > >> delete from Firefox profile. I just want

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

wrote: > the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > [...] > > Though, I can not import the bookmarks, I'm on Firefox-bin-38.3.0 > > There is no entry: Bookmarks ==> Manage Bookmarks > > I have: Bookmarks ==> Show All Bookmarks > > where I can restore and backup bookmars. I've tried

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox profile uses 100% CPU

Thelma On 11/12/2015 08:22 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > [...] >> Though, I can not import the bookmarks, I'm on Firefox-bin-38.3.0 >> There is no entry: Bookmarks ==> Manage Bookmarks >> I have: Bookmarks ==> Show All Bookmarks >> where I can restore and

[gentoo-user] Re: LINGUAS issue

Hi Francisco, Francisco Ares wrote: > Hi, all. > > My locale language is "pt_BR" (Brazilian Portuguese), and many > applications now support native translations. > > And there is the "pt" possible LINGUAS entry, and there is no "pt_PT" > (Portugal spoken Portuguese), for instance, neither any

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS issue

Hi Francisco, On 2015-11-12 15:20, Francisco Ares wrote: > Is there a way for specifying particular "LINGUAS" for individual > packages? Sure there is. In fact, "LINGUAS=pt_BR" is just syntactical sugar for "USE=linguas_pt_BR". So for your specific case with tesseract, you would add a line to

[gentoo-user] LINGUAS issue

Hi, all. My locale language is "pt_BR" (Brazilian Portuguese), and many applications now support native translations. And there is the "pt" possible LINGUAS entry, and there is no "pt_PT" (Portugal spoken Portuguese), for instance, neither any derivatives for other Portuguese speaking countries,

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox-bin GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed

On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:47:44 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> I was just checking out on other forums; chromium is an open source > >>> and not very well maintain. www-client/google-chrome suppose to be > >>> better. > >> > >> On what is that claim based? Chromium used the chrome source code >

Re: [gentoo-user] All sorts of digest verification failures

Grant Edwards wrote: > After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my > "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files > are broken for about 2/3 of the packages it wants to update: > > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!!

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 2015-11-12, wrote: > Grant Edwards wrote: > >> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my >> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files >> are broken for about 2/3 of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox-bin GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed

On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 20:46:45 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:07:20 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > >> Is "www-client/chromium" good alternative to firefox? > > > > > > I much prefer it, but that's all it is, personal preference. Try it > > > and decide for yourself.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 18:45:44 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2015-11-12, wrote: > >> Grant Edwards wrote: > >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my > >>>

[gentoo-user] All sorts of digest verification failures

After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files are broken for about 2/3 of the packages it wants to update: !!! Digest verification failed: !!! /usr/portage/dev-libs/libxml2/ChangeLog !!! Reason: Filesize does

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-12, wrote: >> Grant Edwards wrote: >> >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my >>> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox-bin GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed

On 12/11/2015 18:40, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 20:46:45 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:07:20 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Is "www-client/chromium" good alternative to firefox? I much prefer it, but that's all it is, personal

Re: [gentoo-user] All sorts of digest verification failures

Grant Edwards wrote: > After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my > "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files > are broken for about 2/3 of the packages it wants to update: > > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!!

Re: [gentoo-user] Akonadi database errors

On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 12:10:36 I wrote: > Do any other KDE users have serious-looking errors in > ~/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err? I'm seeing a whole lot of table > structure errors, among others. KMail seems to limp on regardless, which > seems odd. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-12, wrote: >> Grant Edwards wrote: >> >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my >>> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files >>> are

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS issue

Francisco Ares wrote: > Hi, all. > > My locale language is "pt_BR" (Brazilian Portuguese), and many > applications now support native translations. > > And there is the "pt" possible LINGUAS entry, and there is no "pt_PT" > (Portugal spoken Portuguese), for instance, neither