Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to view attachments... I've finally found what I think was the culprit - a menu option hidden in the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:19:12 +0100, David W Noon wrote: Claws-mail also has that option, but it applies globally, and there are some email messages I receive (mostly marketing related) where HTML gives added value. Consequently, I would have to keep reconfiguring Claws to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Michael Mol
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote:   You seem to be sending multipart/alternative.  I didn't even notice that there was any HTML.  Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to view attachments...

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Tue, Apr 24 2012, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to view attachments... I've finally found what I think was

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 14:03:38 Allan Gottlieb wrote: On Tue, Apr 24 2012, Peter Humphrey wrote: Would someone please confirm whether this has had the desired effect? Many thanks. Success. Just text. thanks, allan Thank you both. I dare say we're all glad that's finally fixed! --

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:36:56AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to view attachments... I've finally

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 21 April 2012 16:21:31 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Do a: dmesg | grep -i firmware and check for firmware loading errors. I have what seems to be the same network hardware, so I did what you said and duly found an error. I hadn't had any obvious network performance problems

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: [snip] So I removed linux-firmware, rebooted and got kmail back. We all noticed that you are using KMail once more, because you are sending HTML messages with a huge font and bold

[gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/04/12 21:34, David W Noon wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: [snip] So I removed linux-firmware, rebooted and got kmail back. We all noticed that you are using KMail once more, because you are sending

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:53:36 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote about [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: On 23/04/12 21:34, David W Noon wrote: [snip] Any chance of you reconfiguring KMail not to send HTML messages? Please ... pretty please ... :-) A mail-client worth its salt

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 23 April 2012 19:34:58 David W Noon wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: [snip] So I removed linux-firmware, rebooted and got kmail back. We all noticed that you are using KMail once more

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote: On Monday 23 April 2012 19:34:58 David W Noon wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: [snip] So I removed linux-firmware

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:18:27 +0100, David W Noon wrote: Claws-mail also has that option, but it applies globally, and there are some email messages I receive (mostly marketing related) where HTML gives added value. Consequently, I would have to keep reconfiguring Claws to exclude/permit HTML

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:14:46 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:18:27 +0100, David W Noon wrote: Claws-mail also has that option, but it applies globally, and there are some email messages I receive (mostly marketing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Walter Dnes
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:56:13PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote Is this better? I hate HTML in e-mail and I've never set any kmail option to use it; however I did find html-markup=true in kmailrc and set it to false. Actually, that kmailrc setting sounds familiar from the last time

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to view attachments... -- Mutt: Attachments I 1 no description

[gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 21/04/12 17:25, Philip Webb wrote: 120421 Dale wrote: Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it ignore files.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 21/04/12 17:25, Philip Webb wrote: 120421 Dale wrote: Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we could put a # on the

[gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 21/04/12 18:55, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: [...] Also, make sure to emerge sys-kernel/linux-firmware. Without it, RTL8111/8168B NICs will produce random connectivity hang-ups after a few hours; they need firmware that was previously part of the kernel itself but has now been

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 21/04/12 18:55, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: [...] Also, make sure to emerge sys-kernel/linux-firmware. Without it, RTL8111/8168B NICs will produce random connectivity hang-ups after a few hours; they need firmware that was previously part of the kernel