On Saturday 10/15/11 00:05:35 CST, Lavender wrote:
It's my fault, there're no line-breaks because I wrote the letters
exactly like what the screenshot shows . I will write just like
this letter. No more questions , good evening and tomorrow is
a nice day !
A little tip about your mail
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again.
:-P
Jeez, 43 years on and you're still
On Oct 15, 2011 1:58 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again.
:-P
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. :-P
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 00:50:22 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Canek,
Hi Michael.
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 00:50:22 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var/lib usually stores whole
databases. The difference is important and relevant.
My systems has directories alsa, bluetooth, hp and many more
there that are not databases at all.
So?
Which one? That /var is not going
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var/lib usually stores whole
databases. The difference is important and relevant.
My systems has directories alsa, bluetooth, hp and many more
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var/lib usually stores whole
databases. The difference is important and
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:21:18 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauergrim...@gmx.de wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people solve those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is needed during boot in the next ten years, they will
propose to move it to /. They do it with
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 01:42:10 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:21:18 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:02:13 Canek Peláez
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var != /var/run
/var != /var/lock
/var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the same vein, /var/lock
also is going into /run/lock. I have acknowledged
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauergrim...@gmx.de
wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people solve those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is needed during boot in the
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
/var != /var/run
/var != /var/lock
/var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:11:43 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 03:34:27 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 03:34:27 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:10:37 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It's arbitrary (basically) on executables and libraries. If an script
needs something more (from /var, lets say), then the rule should be
written in such a way that it can be called after that directory is
mounted. If you try to
Am Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:31:24 +0100
schrieb Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:10:37 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It's arbitrary (basically) on executables and libraries. If an
script needs something more (from /var, lets say), then the rule
should be written in
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
/var != /var/run
/var != /var/lock
/var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the same vein, /var/lock
also is going into /run/lock. I
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
It basically removes the need for a pesky init* thingy, although for
the life of me I cannot understand why someone will not see the
technical advantages of actually using an initramfs.
I'll use your own opening
On 2011-10-15 11:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Yes, as I said in my last mail, if you need LVM, you need an
initramfs. Remove the LVM, and you can have /var (and /usr for that
matter) withouth an initramfs. Where/when did I say something
different?
I assume you mean: if you need LVM for /,
Wow. Just wow.
GREAT way to confuse and welcome the poor-English Chinese guy.
Welcome Lavender. You are now officially recognized as a human being, not a
bot.
We'll be glad to help you with Gentoo.
Please ignore all the FUD and discussion about /var needing (or not) to be
in the root partition,
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauergrim...@gmx.de
wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people solve those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:34:10 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I noticed the other day that when LVM tries to start, it fails. I have
/var on a separate partition here. It was complaining about something
on /var missing. So, you may be late in reporting this. I think it is
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 03:34:27 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de
wrote:
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 02:47:26 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer
grim...@gmx.de
Hi Claudio, hi Lavender,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 13:46:31 Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Wow. Just wow.
:)
GREAT way to confuse and welcome the poor-English Chinese guy.
Welcome Lavender. You are now officially recognized as a human being, not a
bot.
We'll be glad to help you
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 04:04:05 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I got that points wrong, I admit. I repeat, 3am here ;) I apogolize
for saying that to you Michael; I shouldn't have, even if I would have
been right (and I wasn't). Again, no excuse, but it's (actually) 4am
here now.
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:46:31 -0300, Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Wow. Just wow.
GREAT way to confuse and welcome the poor-English Chinese guy.
Good point. Sorry Lavender, please feel free to start another thread...
which may or may not get hijacked.
Please ignore all the FUD and
On 10/15/2011 4:42 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Which one? That /var is not going into /? It's not disinformation, it
is th true. If not, please be so kind of showin one single developer
reference that says so. One. Single. One.
Email, blog post, wiki, you choose it. But one single one.
I
On Fri, Oct 14, 82011 at 11:43 AM, Lavender 448463...@qq.com wrote:
First of all I think I should apologize for my poor English , you must be
very painful to read my letters.
I'm a Chinese student and my English is not very well , actually it's suck.
So I will pay attention to making
letters
Michael Mol wrote:
Hey, we've all got lives outside this mailing list. Except Dale,
perhaps. :)
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. :-P
Dale
:-) :-)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. :-P
Jeez, 43 years on and you're still going on about it...
--
Neil Bothwick
Be strict when sending and tolerant when receiving.
RFC 1958 - Architectural Principles of the
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. :-P
Jeez, 43 years on and you're still going on about it...
Dang, I was only a year old when hal came out? That just doubled my
age. It's closer to
On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. :-P
Jeez, 43 years on and you're still going on about it...
Dang, I was only a year old
44 matches
Mail list logo
