Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
On Sunday, 24 June 2018 19:49:02 BST Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 2:28 PM wrote: > > Since the unstable packages of today are the stable packages of > > tommorrow one needs to bite the bullet (and hopefully this sentence > > is not complete nonsense...I am no native speaker...not at all!) > > Presumably if you're running stable on a host you probably wouldn't > want to be biting the bullet on that particular host. > > In any case, it seems likely that the news item shouldn't have been > displayed to stable users, or should have had instructions pertaining > to who it was targeted at. Well, on my stable system I went and keyworded mpfr-4.0.1 and mpc-1.1.0-r1, then followed the instructions. I did that because I didn't want to find, later, that I'd been left behind by those versions becoming stable and not remembering the news item. I saw a good chance of inexplicable failures in that case. > Of course, it shouldn't have been displayed for anybody considering it > was never reviewed as required by GLEP 42. Stuff like this is the > reason these are supposed to be reviewed... I'll leave those concerned to wrestle with that one...;) -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
On 25 June 2018 at 04:19, wrote: > I think, my attempt to play with words despite the fact that I am no > native speaker ;) has spent some confusion (or I understand something > wrong right now: > > In my make,conf this is set > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" > > so I am on unstable. The actual error, in case anyone knows the fix: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r3/work/gcc-7.3.0/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc:157:10: fatal error: sys/ustat.h: No such file or directory #include So maybe rebuild glibc or something? Cheers, Arve
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
On 06/24 07:01, Philip Webb wrote: > 180624 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 09:01:53 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > >> The bad news: mpfr-4 was installed after a successful compilation > >> and gcc failed to compile. > > This was a collective thinko of the toolchain team. > > The news item should never have been shown like this to stable users, > > who dont have to do anything now. > > I read the news & immediately noticed that Mpfr-4 is still 'testing'. > After a bit of reflection, as a stable user, > I upgraded to Gcc-7, but left Mpfr + Mpc alone. > Gcc-7 compiled successfully & I wb using it for next week's upgrade. > > -- > ,, > SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto > TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca > > Hi, I think, my attempt to play with words despite the fact that I am no native speaker ;) has spent some confusion (or I understand something wrong right now: In my make,conf this is set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" so I am on unstable. Cheers Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
180624 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 09:01:53 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: >> The bad news: mpfr-4 was installed after a successful compilation >> and gcc failed to compile. > This was a collective thinko of the toolchain team. > The news item should never have been shown like this to stable users, > who dont have to do anything now. I read the news & immediately noticed that Mpfr-4 is still 'testing'. After a bit of reflection, as a stable user, I upgraded to Gcc-7, but left Mpfr + Mpc alone. Gcc-7 compiled successfully & I wb using it for next week's upgrade. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 09:01:53 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > Hi, > > I think I am in trouble here...especially after reading the news > item... > > After the daily sunc routine, a new news items was announced which > I read. > > It saus, that the update to mpfr-4 could possibly break gcc. Therefore > I had to recompile a combo of sources including mpfr and gcc. > > The bad news: mpfr-4 was installed after a successful compilation and > gcc failed to compile. > This was a collective thinko of the toolchain team. The news item should never have been shown (like this) to stable users (who dont have to do anything now). Emergency instructions ** if you now have problems building any of these packages ** and have a stable system ** (untested, but not that much can be wrong): 1) Make sure in your config files that both mpfr and mpc are either keyworded stable or ~arch, not any mixed combination 2) rebuild in this order, with emerge -1a --ignore-built-slot-operator-deps y * mpfr * mpc * gcc -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 2:28 PM wrote: > > Since the unstable packages of today are the stable packages of > tommorrow one needs to bite the bullet (and hopefully this sentence > is not complete nonsense...I am no native speaker...not at all!) > Presumably if you're running stable on a host you probably wouldn't want to be biting the bullet on that particular host. In any case, it seems likely that the news item shouldn't have been displayed to stable users, or should have had instructions pertaining to who it was targeted at. Of course, it shouldn't have been displayed for anybody considering it was never reviewed as required by GLEP 42. Stuff like this is the reason these are supposed to be reviewed... -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
On 06/24 11:12, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 06/24/18 10:21, Dale wrote: > > Plus it does say to include that info. If it wasn't provided, it would > > likely be asked for at some point unless someone has ran into that > > specific problem and can recognize it with nothing but the bare info. > > > > My email program downloaded the whole thing but I don't hold it against > > someone that is just following instructions. I just wish I knew how to > > help. :/ > > > > Dale > > > > :-) :-) > > > > Mine downloaded the whole thing too, but I have 150 mbps symmetrical and > it only took one second to load the message. > > Meino, mpfr-4 is marked unstable/testing, is there a specific reason > you're trying to use it? > > You could also refer to: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mpfr4-update-guide > > Failing that, you'll probably have to open a bug. > > Dan > Hi Dan, thanks for your offered help! In the past I run Gentoo stable with more headaches than now running on "un"stable. mpfr is compiling fine...thats not the problem. sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0 compiled fine sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r1 compiled fine sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r3 compiled fine (Mon May 21 15:02:26 2018 according to qlop -l But now it fails in stage 3 as far as I can see for an unknown (at least for me) reason. I switched off any optimization in make.conf and tried again but with no success. Masking and waiting for the next update does not help since emerge wants this package and stops any update until I unmask gcc it. That gives me a nearly full three-stage compilation intro of gcc with a grande finale: Failed with each sync. H Since the unstable packages of today are the stable packages of tommorrow one needs to bite the bullet (and hopefully this sentence is not complete nonsense...I am no native speaker...not at all!) Cheers! Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
On 06/24/18 10:21, Dale wrote: > Plus it does say to include that info. If it wasn't provided, it would > likely be asked for at some point unless someone has ran into that > specific problem and can recognize it with nothing but the bare info. > > My email program downloaded the whole thing but I don't hold it against > someone that is just following instructions. I just wish I knew how to > help. :/ > > Dale > > :-) :-) > Mine downloaded the whole thing too, but I have 150 mbps symmetrical and it only took one second to load the message. Meino, mpfr-4 is marked unstable/testing, is there a specific reason you're trying to use it? You could also refer to: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mpfr4-update-guide Failing that, you'll probably have to open a bug. Dan
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
zless wrote: > În ziua de duminică, 24 iunie 2018, la 11:55:52 EEST, Zoltán Kócsi a scris: >> Hi, >> >>> Here are the outputs, which I should include if I need support >>> according to emerge ;) >> Still, if you didn't attach 9MB worth of stuff, that'd be appreciated. >> >> As a rough guess, the Gentoo list probably has at least 5 thousand >> different subscribers, so your simple email generated some 45GB >> outgoing traffic on the server. >> >> On a personal note, I'm in Australia where, thanks to our Liberal >> government building a National Broadband Network that was outdated >> about 10 years before its inception, we have the speed of a string and >> tin cans, but without their reliability. >> > On a brighter note use KMail which will not download the attachments but > will allow to read the message itself. > > I'm sure there are other well behaved email programs like this. > Plus it does say to include that info. If it wasn't provided, it would likely be asked for at some point unless someone has ran into that specific problem and can recognize it with nothing but the bare info. My email program downloaded the whole thing but I don't hold it against someone that is just following instructions. I just wish I knew how to help. :/ Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
În ziua de duminică, 24 iunie 2018, la 11:55:52 EEST, Zoltán Kócsi a scris: > Hi, > > > Here are the outputs, which I should include if I need support > > according to emerge ;) > > Still, if you didn't attach 9MB worth of stuff, that'd be appreciated. > > As a rough guess, the Gentoo list probably has at least 5 thousand > different subscribers, so your simple email generated some 45GB > outgoing traffic on the server. > > On a personal note, I'm in Australia where, thanks to our Liberal > government building a National Broadband Network that was outdated > about 10 years before its inception, we have the speed of a string and > tin cans, but without their reliability. > On a brighter note use KMail which will not download the attachments but will allow to read the message itself. I'm sure there are other well behaved email programs like this.
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...
Hi, > Here are the outputs, which I should include if I need support > according to emerge ;) Still, if you didn't attach 9MB worth of stuff, that'd be appreciated. As a rough guess, the Gentoo list probably has at least 5 thousand different subscribers, so your simple email generated some 45GB outgoing traffic on the server. On a personal note, I'm in Australia where, thanks to our Liberal government building a National Broadband Network that was outdated about 10 years before its inception, we have the speed of a string and tin cans, but without their reliability. Regards, Zoltan
