List
1. The subject of ethics and morality have been key to this list discussions,
especially over the last week. .As I was further researching this list's
discussion on this topic, I came on a short message string introduced by Andrew
Lockley on April 11. Andrew, as is his welcome style, aler
Ditto. I appreciate the difficult task you are doing. - Greg
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [geoengineering@googlegroups.com] on
behalf of John Latham [john.latha...@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2013 12:42 PM
To: andrew.lock...@gmail.c
Hello Andrew,
I think you do a very difficult job extremely well, handling tricky
issues fairly and with great sensitivity. Thank you!
John (Latham)
John Latham
Address: P.O. Box 3000,MMM,NCAR,Boulder,CO 80307-3000
Email: lat...@ucar.edu or john.latha...@manchester.ac.uk
Tel: (US-Work) 303-4
What seems like a nice recent summary of ocean acidification science
(experts, am I right?)
http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/10/8715/2013/bgd-10-8715-2013.pdf
A short history of ocean acidification science in the 20th century: a
chemist's view
P. G. Brewer
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Ins
Our latest offering on abiotic CDR can be found here:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/30/1222358110.full.pdf
Some highlights:
air CO2 captured and safely stored - check
carbon-negative H2 produced - check
ocean alkalinity beneficially increased, OA and impacts reduced - check
<$100/tonne
I think it's important to distinguish between the effects of advocacy and
the inertia of the energy system. I believe the inertia is huge relative
to the effects of advocacy because of the tremendous switching costt of
infrastructure, distribution, power systems. Advocacy affects choices at
the m
Dear Stephen,
My list of 26 problems is in slide 157 of
http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/RobockGeoEngineering72ForDistribution.ppt
I have been mainly focused on stratospheric aerosols. My latest
publication on this is a response to Seitz's bubbles proposal at
http://climate.envsci.rutgers.e
Dear Alan
Can you tell me which of your 26 objections apply to marine cloud
brightening?
I am sure that many of the people who want research on but not
deployment of geoengineering systems are greatly reassured that you are
there to spot the nasty problems. Keep up your valuable work.
I t
Dear All,
I also was at the NASA Ames meeting. It was my first geoengineering
meeting, and it was there that I was struck with the very enthusiastic
endorsement of geoengineering as a solution to global warming by people
who did not seem to be aware of the potential negative impacts. But Lane
Dear All,
I would like to refer you to an interesting session on geoengineering at
AEI last week, available at
http://aei.org/events/2013/05/29/solar-radiation-management-an-evolving-climate-policy-option/
. The main message was that we need a much more robust geoengineering
research program,
Clive's problem is that he seems to think Haroon and Lee are foxes. And
that anyone associated in any way with organizations like AEI and Exxon
must be a fox. And that anyone who doesn't realize this must be naive.
He's wrong.
Tom.
++
On 6/1/2013 6:05 AM, euggor...@comcas
Much less about misunderstanding at all about the issue of saturation, a
criticism of Arrhenius that has been addressed many, many times and kicked
out of science as an issue by Manabe and others in the 1960s.
Mike
On 5/31/13 1:33 PM, "David Lewis" wrote:
> According to the University of Water
12 matches
Mail list logo
