-- Forwarded message --
From: Clive Hamilton m...@clivehamilton.com
Date: 23 Jun 2014 05:08
Subject: The good Anthropocene
To: Clive Hamilton m...@clivehamilton.com
Cc:
Dear friends
You might be interested in a piece by me critiquing the notion of a “good
Anthropocene”, published
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10807039.2014.932203
Laypeople's Risky Decisions in the Climate Change Context: Climate
Engineering as a Risk-Defusing Strategy?
Dorothee Amelung and Joachim Funkea Department of Psychology, Heidelberg
University,Heidelberg, Germany
Human and
Dear Group:
We saw the best response in terms of in chlorophyll production in the
Los Alamos Biogeochemical Parallel Ocean Program model where diazatrophs
first responded to Fe and subsequent nitrogen was fixated. 2 femtomolar
additions of iron led to about a 20 fold increase in Chlorophyll
I am curious as to how much of these nutrients are contained below the
photic zone of the ocean or in the sediment on the ocean floor of these
patches. The first may relate to the application of a pump advocated by
Lovelock. The second to the plausibility of moving sediment a few thousand
If I may... My own short take on the Good Anthropocene topic:
http://www.grinzo.com/energy/2014/06/19/self-delusion-and-the-absurdity-of-a-good-anthropocene/
On Monday, June 23, 2014 3:36:19 AM UTC-4, andrewjlockley wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Clive Hamilton
Hi Bhaskar,
Thanks for this. I am too late for the seminar, but I consider this work
to be of the utmost importance. If climate continues to deteriorate, as
many now expect (especially those who suspect that Arctic warming has
become the main driver of climate change), we are going to have to
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:09 AM, M V Bhaskar bhaskarmv...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Fertilizing the oceans to restore fisheries is NOT prohibited, that is why
the Haida Salmon Restoration Project is perfectly legal.
I hope you are right. There is a bit of a question there. I suppose
as long as
